Literature DB >> 26566777

Liver apparent diffusion coefficient repeatability with individually predetermined optimal cardiac timing and artifact elimination by signal filtering.

Thierry Metens1, Julie Absil1, Vincent Denolin2, Maria Antonietta Bali1, Celso Matos1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess liver ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) repeatability from cardiac-triggered diffusion-weighted images obtained with an individually predetermined optimal cardiac time window minimizing cardiac-related effects and to evaluate a signal filtering method aimed at artifact elimination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, eight healthy volunteers underwent four repetitions of respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted sequences (3T, b: 0,150,500 s/mm(2) ) without (RTnoCT, 51 sec) and with individually optimized cardiac triggering (RTCT, 306 sec). The optimal cardiac delay was individually predetermined using a 5-second breath-hold sequence. Monoexponential liver ADC and left-to-right-liver ADC ratio were computed from region of interest (ROI) signal measurements (two independent readers). A filtering method, excluding signal intensities lower than the mean intensity at fixed b-value, provided ADC recalculation. Limits-of-agreement (LOAs) from 95% confidence intervals for differences across the four repetitions provided the variability range.
RESULTS: For Reader 1 (Reader 2), left-to-right-liver ADC ratios were significantly higher in RTnoCT 1.51 (1.52) than in RTCT 1.12 (1.15), P = 0.012 (P = 0.017). Respectively for RTnoCT and RTCT: left liver LOAs were ±835 (±775), ± 315 (±369) 10(-6) mm(2) /s; right liver LOAs were ±392 (±445), ± 172 (±140) 10(-6) mm(2) /s: LOAs were larger in the left than in the right lobe (both P < 0.001). After filtering, left liver ADC LOAs narrowed to ±650 (±367) 10(-6) mm(2) /s, P = 0.17 (P < 0.001); ± 152 (±208) 10(-6) mm(2) /s (both P < 0.002) and left-to-right-liver ADC ratio decreased to 1.28 (1.20), P = 0.017 (P = 0.012); 1.09 (1.08), P = 0.106 (P = 0.105).
CONCLUSION: Compared to noncardiac-triggered acquisitions, individually optimized cardiac-triggered acquisitions improved ADC repeatability in both liver lobes and reduced ADC differences between left and right liver. Left liver ADC repeatability was further improved after signal filtering.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac triggering; diffusion-weighted MRI; liver; quantification; repeatability; reproducibility

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26566777     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  12 in total

1.  Repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measurements: a prospective multicenter whole-body-MRI study.

Authors:  Nicolas F Michoux; Jakub W Ceranka; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Frank Peeters; Pierre Lu; Julie Absil; Perrine Triqueneaux; Yan Liu; Laurence Collette; Inneke Willekens; Carola Brussaard; Olivier Debeir; Stephan Hahn; Hubert Raeymaekers; Johan de Mey; Thierry Metens; Frédéric E Lecouvet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging and texture analysis: current role for diffuse liver disease.

Authors:  Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Joao Santinha; Celso Matos; Nikolaos Papanikolaou
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-16

3.  b value and first-order motion moment optimized data acquisition for repeatable quantitative intravoxel incoherent motion DWI.

Authors:  Gregory Simchick; Ruiqi Geng; Yuxin Zhang; Diego Hernando
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.737

4.  Flow-compensated diffusion encoding in MRI for improved liver metastasis detection.

Authors:  Frederik B Laun; Tobit Führes; Hannes Seuss; Astrid Müller; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Alto Stemmer; Thomas Benkert; Michael Uder; Marc Saake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: Current applications.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Saito; Yu Tajima; Taiyo L Harada
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-28

6.  3D analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient histograms in hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grade.

Authors:  Tomohisa Moriya; Kazuhiro Saito; Yu Tajima; Taiyo L Harada; Yoichi Araki; Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Koichi Tokuuye
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 7.  Implementing diffusion-weighted MRI for body imaging in prospective multicentre trials: current considerations and future perspectives.

Authors:  N M deSouza; J M Winfield; J C Waterton; A Weller; M-V Papoutsaki; S J Doran; D J Collins; L Fournier; D Sullivan; T Chenevert; A Jackson; M Boss; S Trattnig; Y Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Assessment of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging as quantitative biomarkers for differentiating benign from malignant solid hepatic lesions.

Authors:  Yao Hu; Hao Tang; Haojie Li; Anqin Li; Jiali Li; Daoyu Hu; Zhen Li; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 9.  DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and MRS in Cancer: Challenges and Advantages of Implementing Qualitative and Quantitative Multi-parametric Imaging in the Clinic.

Authors:  Jessica M Winfield; Geoffrey S Payne; Alex Weller; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-10

10.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver using respiratory-cardiac double triggering.

Authors:  Jinning Li; Caiyuan Zhang; Yanfen Cui; Huanhuan Liu; Weibo Chen; Guilong Wang; Dengbin Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.