Rachel M Burns1, Rosalie L Pacula1, Sebastian Bauhoff1, Adam J Gordon2,3, Hollie Hendrikson4, Douglas L Leslie5, Bradley D Stein1,2. 1. a RAND Corporation , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA. 2. b University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA. 3. c Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion , VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA. 4. d National Conference of State Legislatures , Denver , Colorado , USA. 5. e Penn State College of Medicine , Hershey , Pennsylvania , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: State Medicaid policies play an important role in Medicaid enrollees' access to and use of opioid agonists, such as methadone and buprenorphine, in the treatment of opioid use disorders. Little information is available, however, regarding the evolution of state policies facilitating or hindering access to opioid agonists among Medicaid enrollees. METHODS: During 2013-2014, we surveyed state Medicaid officials and other designated state substance abuse treatment specialists about their state's recent history of Medicaid coverage and policies pertaining to methadone and buprenorphine. We describe the evolution of such coverage and policies and present an overview of the Medicaid policy environment with respect to opioid agonist therapy from 2004 to 2013. RESULTS: Among our sample of 45 states with information on buprenorphine and methadone coverage, we found a gradual trend toward adoption of coverage for opioid agonist therapies in state Medicaid agencies. In 2013, only 11% of states in our sample (n = 5) had Medicaid policies that excluded coverage for methadone and buprenorphine, whereas 71% (n = 32) had adopted or maintained policies to cover both buprenorphine and methadone among Medicaid enrollees. We also noted an increase in policies over the time period that may have hindered access to buprenorphine and/or methadone. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a trend for states to enact policies increasing Medicaid coverage of opioid agonist therapies, while in recent years also enacting policies, such as prior authorization requirements, that potentially serve as barriers to opioid agonist therapy utilization. Greater empirical information about the potential benefits and potential unintended consequences of such policies can provide policymakers and others with a more informed understanding of their policy decisions.
BACKGROUND: State Medicaid policies play an important role in Medicaid enrollees' access to and use of opioid agonists, such as methadone and buprenorphine, in the treatment of opioid use disorders. Little information is available, however, regarding the evolution of state policies facilitating or hindering access to opioid agonists among Medicaid enrollees. METHODS: During 2013-2014, we surveyed state Medicaid officials and other designated state substance abuse treatment specialists about their state's recent history of Medicaid coverage and policies pertaining to methadone and buprenorphine. We describe the evolution of such coverage and policies and present an overview of the Medicaid policy environment with respect to opioid agonist therapy from 2004 to 2013. RESULTS: Among our sample of 45 states with information on buprenorphine and methadone coverage, we found a gradual trend toward adoption of coverage for opioid agonist therapies in state Medicaid agencies. In 2013, only 11% of states in our sample (n = 5) had Medicaid policies that excluded coverage for methadone and buprenorphine, whereas 71% (n = 32) had adopted or maintained policies to cover both buprenorphine and methadone among Medicaid enrollees. We also noted an increase in policies over the time period that may have hindered access to buprenorphine and/or methadone. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a trend for states to enact policies increasing Medicaid coverage of opioid agonist therapies, while in recent years also enacting policies, such as prior authorization requirements, that potentially serve as barriers to opioid agonist therapy utilization. Greater empirical information about the potential benefits and potential unintended consequences of such policies can provide policymakers and others with a more informed understanding of their policy decisions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Buprenorphine; opioid use disorder; policy
Authors: Robin E Clark; Jeffrey D Baxter; Bruce A Barton; Gideon Aweh; Elizabeth O'Connell; William H Fisher Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Bradley D Stein; Adam J Gordon; Andrew W Dick; Rachel M Burns; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; Carrie M Farmer; Douglas L Leslie; Mark Sorbero Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2014-08-02
Authors: Paul J Fudala; T Peter Bridge; Susan Herbert; William O Williford; C Nora Chiang; Karen Jones; Joseph Collins; Dennis Raisch; Paul Casadonte; R Jeffrey Goldsmith; Walter Ling; Usha Malkerneker; Laura McNicholas; John Renner; Susan Stine; Donald Tusel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christopher M Doran; Marian Shanahan; Richard P Mattick; Robert Ali; Jason White; James Bell Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2003-09-10 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Evgeny Krupitsky; Elena Blokhina; Edwin Zvartau; Elena Verbitskaya; Dmitri Lioznov; Tatiana Yaroslavtseva; Vladimir Palatkin; Marina Vetrova; Natalia Bushara; Andrei Burakov; Dmitri Masalov; Olga Mamontova; Daniel Langleben; Sabrina Poole; Robert Gross; George Woody Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Alex K Gertner; Allison G Robertson; Hendree Jones; Byron J Powell; Pam Silberman; Marisa E Domino Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Alana Sharp; Austin Jones; Jennifer Sherwood; Oksana Kutsa; Brian Honermann; Gregorio Millett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Bradley D Stein; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; Adam J Gordon; Rachel M Burns; Douglas L Leslie; Mark J Sorbero; Sebastian Bauhoff; Todd W Mandell; Andrew W Dick Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Anjalee Sharma; Sharon M Kelly; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Jan Gryczynski; Kevin E O'Grady; Robert P Schwartz Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Andrew W Dick; Rosalie L Pacula; Adam J Gordon; Mark Sorbero; Rachel M Burns; Douglas Leslie; Bradley D Stein Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Peter S Ostling; Kelly S Davidson; Best O Anyama; Erik M Helander; Melville Q Wyche; Alan D Kaye Journal: Curr Pain Headache Rep Date: 2018-04-04