Fan Yang1, Titus Lau2, Nan Luo1. 1. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore. 2. Division of Nephrology, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.
Abstract
AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of haemodialysis (HD), continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Singapore. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to examine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of HD, CAPD and APD over the 10-year time horizon from the societal perspective, using clinical data from an observational study and the national renal registry, utilities from published studies and costs from dialysis services providers. The base-case analysis was for a hypothetical cohort of 60-year-old non-diabetic ESRD patients. A high-risk group of 60-year-old diabetic ESRD patients was also studied. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were 3.27 with CAPD, 3.48 with APD and 4.69 with HD. The total costs were Singapore dollar $169 872 for CAPD, $201 509 for APD and $306 827 for HD. CAPD and HD had extended dominance over APD. The ICER of HD versus CAPD was $96 447 (US$69 121) per QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were most sensitive to the utility of HD. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that CAPD had the maximum probability of being cost-effective among treatments under evaluation at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $60 000 (US$43 000) per QALY. The high-risk group analyses showed similar results. The ICER of HD versus CAPD was $106 281 (US$76 168) per QALY and the probability of CAPD being optimal was the highest using the same WTP threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggested that starting dialysis with CAPD is most cost-effective for ESRD patients in Singapore.
AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of haemodialysis (HD), continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Singapore. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to examine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of HD, CAPD and APD over the 10-year time horizon from the societal perspective, using clinical data from an observational study and the national renal registry, utilities from published studies and costs from dialysis services providers. The base-case analysis was for a hypothetical cohort of 60-year-old non-diabetic ESRDpatients. A high-risk group of 60-year-old diabetic ESRDpatients was also studied. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were 3.27 with CAPD, 3.48 with APD and 4.69 with HD. The total costs were Singapore dollar $169 872 for CAPD, $201 509 for APD and $306 827 for HD. CAPD and HD had extended dominance over APD. The ICER of HD versus CAPD was $96 447 (US$69 121) per QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were most sensitive to the utility of HD. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that CAPD had the maximum probability of being cost-effective among treatments under evaluation at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $60 000 (US$43 000) per QALY. The high-risk group analyses showed similar results. The ICER of HD versus CAPD was $106 281 (US$76 168) per QALY and the probability of CAPD being optimal was the highest using the same WTP threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggested that starting dialysis with CAPD is most cost-effective for ESRDpatients in Singapore.
Authors: Carlos K H Wong; Julie Chen; Samuel K S Fung; Maggie Mok; Yuk Lun Cheng; Irene Kong; Wai Kei Lo; Sing Leung Lui; T M Chan; Cindy L K Lam Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Hirman Ismail; Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf; Abdul Halim Abdul Gafor; Zaki Morad Mohamad Zaher; Adriana Irawati Nur Ibrahim Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2019-05-29
Authors: Emeline Han; Victoria Haldane; Joel Jun Kai Koh; Rina Yu Chin Quek; Semra Ozdemir; Eric Andrew Finkelstein; Tazeen Hasan Jafar; Hui-Lin Choong; Sheryl Gan; Lydia W W Lim; Farah Shiraz; Helena Legido-Quigley Journal: Health Expect Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 3.377