Literature DB >> 26566736

Who can escape the natural number bias in rational number tasks? A study involving students and experts.

Andreas Obersteiner1,2, Jo Van Hoof1, Lieven Verschaffel1, Wim Van Dooren1.   

Abstract

Many learners have difficulties with rational number tasks because they persistently rely on their natural number knowledge, which is not always applicable. Studies show that such a natural number bias can mislead not only children but also educated adults. It is still unclear whether and under what conditions mathematical expertise enables people to be completely unaffected by such a bias on tasks in which people with less expertise are clearly biased. We compared the performance of eighth-grade students and expert mathematicians on the same set of algebraic expression problems that addressed the effect of arithmetic operations (multiplication and division). Using accuracy and response time measures, we found clear evidence for a natural number bias in students but no traces of a bias in experts. The data suggested that whereas students based their answers on their intuitions about natural numbers, expert mathematicians relied on their skilled intuitions about algebraic expressions. We conclude that it is possible for experts to be unaffected by the natural number bias on rational number tasks when they use strategies that do not involve natural numbers.
© 2015 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  algebraic inequalities; effect of arithmetic operations; rational numbers; whole number bias

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26566736     DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  2 in total

1.  Response: Commentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.

Authors:  André Mata; Mário B Ferreira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-26

2.  Digital support principles for sustained mathematics learning in disadvantaged students.

Authors:  Frank Reinhold; Sarah Isabelle Hofer; Stefan Hoch; Bernhard Werner; Jürgen Richter-Gebert; Kristina Reiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.