Marius Valera1, Natalia Ibañez2, Rogelio Sancho3, Marc Tey4. 1. Orthopaedic Department, Hip Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Quintí, 89, 08026, Barcelona, Spain. mvalera@santpau.cat. 2. Orthopaedic Department, Hip Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Quintí, 89, 08026, Barcelona, Spain. naia1310@gmail.com. 3. Orthopaedic Department, Hip Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Quintí, 89, 08026, Barcelona, Spain. rnavarro@santpau.cat. 4. Parc de Salut Mar, Hip Unit, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. marcteypons@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Tönnis classification is widely accepted for grading hip arthritis, but its usefulness as a reference in hip-preserving surgery is yet to be demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate reproducibility of the Tönnis classification in early stages of hip osteoarthritis, and thus determine whether it is a reliable reference for hip-preserving surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of experience examined 117 hip X-rays that were randomly mixed of two groups: a group of 31 candidates for hip-preserving surgery and a control group of 30 patients that were asymptomatic with respect to the hip joint. The surgeons were asked to rate an eventual osteoarthritis according to the Tönnis classification. After 2 months, the surgeons were asked to re-evaluate the X-rays in a random order. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were calculated by comparing the observers' two estimations using Kappa statistics. RESULTS: Kappa values for interobserver reliability were slight or fair (range 0.173-0.397). Kappa values for intraobserver reproducibility were fair (range 0.364-0.397). Variance in grading no and slight osteoarthritis was the most frequent cause for intra- and interobserver disagreements (76.3 and 73.01% of the non-concordant observations, respectively). The confidence interval analysis showed that the observers' experience did not affect reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: The Tönnis classification is a poor method to assess early stages of hip osteoarthritis. These findings suggest that its routine use in therapeutic decision-making for conservative hip surgery should be reconsidered.
INTRODUCTION: The Tönnis classification is widely accepted for grading hip arthritis, but its usefulness as a reference in hip-preserving surgery is yet to be demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate reproducibility of the Tönnis classification in early stages of hip osteoarthritis, and thus determine whether it is a reliable reference for hip-preserving surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of experience examined 117 hip X-rays that were randomly mixed of two groups: a group of 31 candidates for hip-preserving surgery and a control group of 30 patients that were asymptomatic with respect to the hip joint. The surgeons were asked to rate an eventual osteoarthritis according to the Tönnis classification. After 2 months, the surgeons were asked to re-evaluate the X-rays in a random order. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were calculated by comparing the observers' two estimations using Kappa statistics. RESULTS: Kappa values for interobserver reliability were slight or fair (range 0.173-0.397). Kappa values for intraobserver reproducibility were fair (range 0.364-0.397). Variance in grading no and slight osteoarthritis was the most frequent cause for intra- and interobserver disagreements (76.3 and 73.01% of the non-concordant observations, respectively). The confidence interval analysis showed that the observers' experience did not affect reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: The Tönnis classification is a poor method to assess early stages of hip osteoarthritis. These findings suggest that its routine use in therapeutic decision-making for conservative hip surgery should be reconsidered.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hip osteoarthritis; Hip-preserving surgery; Interobserver reliability; Tönnis classification
Authors: Miguel O Castro; Vasco V Mascarenhas; P Diana Afonso; Paulo Rego; Florian Schmaranzer; Reto Sutter; Ara Kassarjian; Luca Sconfienza; Michael Dienst; Olufemi R Ayeni; Paul E Beaulé; Pedro Dantas; Radhesh Lalam; Marc-André Weber; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Lennart Jans; Philip Robinson; Apostolos H Karantanas; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Suzanne Anderson; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Oliver Marin-Peña; Diego Collado; Marc Tey-Pons; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer; Mario Padron; Josef Kramer; Patrick O Zingg; Michel De Maeseneer; Eva Llopis Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Trevor Grace; Jan Neumann; Michael A Samaan; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link; Alan L Zhang Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Jacob Shapira; Jeffrey W Chen; Rishika Bheem; Philip J Rosinsky; David R Maldonado; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 2.362