Literature DB >> 26566591

What every clinical geneticist should know about testing for osteogenesis imperfecta in suspected child abuse cases.

Melanie G Pepin, Peter H Byers.   

Abstract

Non-accidental injury (NAI) is a major medical concern in the United States. One of the challenges in evaluation of children with unexplained fractures is that genetic forms of bone fragility are one of the differential diagnoses. Infants who present with fractures with mild forms of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) (OI type I or OI type IV), the most common genetic form of bone disease leading to fractures might be missed if clinical evaluation alone is used to make the diagnosis. Diagnostic clinical features (blue sclera, dentinogenesis imperfecta, Wormian bones on X-rays or positive family history) may not be present or apparent at the age of evaluation. The evaluating clinician faces the decision about whether genetic testing is necessary in certain NAI cases. In this review, we outline clinical presentations of mild OI and review the history of genetic testing for OI in the NAI versus OI setting. We summarize our data of molecular testing in the Collagen Diagnostic Laboratory (CDL) from 2008 to 2014 where NAI was noted on the request for DNA sequencing of COL1A1 and COL1A2. We provide recommendations for molecular testing in the NAI versus OI setting. First, DNA sequencing of COL1A1, COL1A2, and IFITM5 simultaneously and duplication/deletion testing is recommended. If a causative variant is not identified, in the absence of a pathologic clinical phenotype, no additional gene testing is indicated. If a VUS is found, parental segregation studies are recommended.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biochemical testing osteogenesis imperfecta; child abuse; molecular testing osteogenesis imperfecta; osteogenesis imperfecta; recurrent fracture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26566591     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  7 in total

Review 1.  Osteogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents-new developments in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  P Trejo; F Rauch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  DNA sequence analysis in 598 individuals with a clinical diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta: diagnostic yield and mutation spectrum.

Authors:  G Bardai; P Moffatt; F H Glorieux; F Rauch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Michael P George; Natasha E Shur; Jeannette M Peréz-Rosselló
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-05-17

4.  Interpreting Osteogenesis Imperfecta Variants of Uncertain Significance in the Context of Physical Abuse: A Case Series.

Authors:  Jennifer Canter; Vinod B Rao; Vincent J Palusci; David Kronn; Michal Manaster; Robin Altman
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2018-09-21

5.  Metaphyseal and posterior rib fractures in osteogenesis imperfecta: Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Amy Bobyn; Mary Jetha; Breanne Frohlich; Sandra Campbell; Jacob L Jaremko; Oana Caluseriu; Chelsey Grimbly
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2022-02-08

6.  Next-generation sequencing of common osteogenesis imperfecta-related genes in clinical practice.

Authors:  Kristóf Árvai; Péter Horváth; Bernadett Balla; Bálint Tobiás; Karina Kató; Gyöngyi Kirschner; Valéria Klujber; Péter Lakatos; János P Kósa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  CLINICAL FEATURES AND PATTERN OF FRACTURES AT THE TIME OF DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA IN CHILDREN.

Authors:  Evelise Brizola; Marina Bauer Zambrano; Bruna de Souza Pinheiro; Ana Paula Vanz; Têmis Maria Félix
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.