| Literature DB >> 26566312 |
Tetsuya Sujishi1, Shinya Fukunishi1, Masaaki Ii2, Ken Nakamura1, Keisuke Yokohama1, Hideko Ohama1, Yusuke Tsuchimoto1, Akira Asai1, Yasuhiro Tsuda1, Kazuhide Higuchi1.
Abstract
The beneficial effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition on diet-induced extra-pancreatic effects, especially on liver tissue remains poorly understood. Thus, we made the experimental designs as follows; five-week-old male ob/ob mice, which develop type 2 diabetic mellitus and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by taking a high-carbohydrate diet (HCD), were divided into a group in which a HCD was given for 8 weeks as control, and another in which a HCD added with 0.0018% sitagliptin was given for 8 weeks. Hepatic steatosis was seen in all mice, but the mean grade of steatosis in the sitagliptin-administrated mice was significantly decreased. The acetyl-CoA concentrations were lower in sitagliptin-administrated mice, although the differences were not significant. However, the malonyl-CoA concentrations were significantly lower in sitagliptin-administrated mice. The expression of acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 was inhibited in sitagliptin-administrated mice, irrespective of expressions of carbohydrate responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP) or sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP)-1c. In conclusion, sitagliptin may affect the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by inhibiting the production of malonyl-CoA and thus synthesis of fatty acids in the liver.Entities:
Keywords: ACC1; GLP-1; high-fructose; sitagliptin; steatosis
Year: 2015 PMID: 26566312 PMCID: PMC4639593 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.15-84
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Primer sequences used for the real-time polymerase chain reaction
| Gene | Primer Sequences (Sense) | Primer Sequences (Antisense) |
|---|---|---|
| TNF-α | 5'-ACCTTGTTGCCTCCTCTT-3' | 5'-GTTCAGTGATGTAGCGACAG-3' |
| IFN-γ | 5'-CGGCACAGTCATTGAAAGCCTA-3' | 5'-GTTGCTGATGGCCTGATTGTC-3' |
| IL-1β | 5'-TCCAGGATGAGGACATGAGCAC-3' | 5'-GAACGTCACACACCAGCAGGTTA-3' |
| IL--6 | 5'-TTCCTCACTGTGGTCAGA-3' | 5'-CATTCATATTGTCAGTTCTTCGTA-3' |
| SREBP-1c | 5'-GGTACCTGCGGGACAGCTTA-3' | 5'-CCGTGAGCTACCTGGACTGAA-3' |
| FAS | 5'-TACAGATGGCAGCAAGGA-3' | 5'-TGATACAGAGAGCAGATGAGT-3' |
| ChREBP | 5'-TCGTGTAGACAACAAC-3' | 5'-ATATTGAACCGCCTCT-3' |
| PPARα | 5'-ATGGCAGCAATATCAGAG-3' | 5'-AGCAGTAAAGTATCATATCAAAG-3' |
| PPARγ | 5'-GAAGACAGAGACAGACAT-3' | 5'-GCAATCAATAGAAGGAACA-3' |
| SCD-1 | 5'-CTGGCTGGAGAGTCATCA-3' | 5'-TAACGAGGACGACAATACAATC-3' |
| ACL | 5'-ACCCAGACATGCGAGTGCAG-3' | 5'-CCGTCCACATTCAGGATAAGATTTG-3' |
| ACC1 | 5'-ATCATAACTCGTATAACATCCA-3' | 5'-CAGGTTAAGGCTCAGACT-3' |
| ACC2 | 5'-CCTCAGCCGAGTAAATGG-3' | 5'-TAAGTGTCTAATAAGCCTCATCA-3' |
| CPT-1A | 5'-GACTACTTGCTAACCTCTGT-3' | 5'-GACACTGGAGACCTGAGA-3' |
| CPT-1B | 5'-CGGAGGAACCTGTCTTCA-3' | 5'-GGCTAAGGACCAATCATTGT-3' |
| IRS-1 | 5'-GCCTTCCATATAGTTA-3' | 5'-GAACCATCATCATCTC-3' |
| IRS-2 | 5'-CCATCCTTTGCCCACA-3' | 5'-GTACTGCTGCCTTCAC-3' |
| PI3K | 5'-GCAGTTAAGAAGCACA-3' | 5'-GTATGAAGCAGGAGAG-3' |
| AMPK | 5'-AAGCCGACCCAATGACATCA-3' | 5'-CTTCCTTCGTACACGCAAAT-3' |
| Acyl-CoA synthetase | 5'-ATGATAATGCGGTGAT-3' | 5'-TACTTGTTACTGTCCA-3' |
| MCAD | 5'-CGGAGGAACCTGTCTTCA-3' | 5'-GGCTAAGGACCAATCATTGT-3' |
| LCAD | 5'-GACATCTGCCTACATCCT-3' | 5'-TCTCTCCCTGTGTTAATCTT-3' |
| ECH | 5'-AGTCTATTCAAGTCACAAGT-3' | 5'-ATGGCATTCCTCTTCTCT-3' |
| HADH | 5'-ATCTTAACCATCACTGTC-3' | 5'-TAGTAGAGTCAATTCATAGG-3' |
| 3-KAT | 5'-AGGTTGTCACGCTACTCA-3' | 5'-ATCCCAGTCCCGATACAC-3' |
Fig. 1Effects of treatments with sitagliptin on body weight. Data are shown as the mean ± SD. ns, not significant.
Outcome of liver/body weight ratio and biochemical parameters in two groups mice
| Parameters | Control group ( | Sitagliptin group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Liver/Body weight ratio (%) | 7.20 ± 0.55 | 7.52 ± 0.41 |
| AST (IU/ml) | 1749.83 ± 366.03 | 817.67 ± 208.54 |
| ALT (IU/ml) | 1556.67 ± 368.39 | 748.33 ± 199.64 |
| T-CHO (mg/dl) | 225.67 ± 24.70 | 201.0 ± 15.43 |
| TG (mg/dl) | 34.83 ± 12.70 | 19.80 ± 4.21 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 313.83 ± 46.73 | 240.33 ± 49.94 |
| GA (%) | 2.97 ± 0.52 | 2.30 ± 0.32 |
| Insulin (ng/ml) | 1.32 ± 0.15 | 3.27 ± 2.08 |
| Hepatic TG (mg/dl) | 37.99 ± 3.49 | 29.97 ± 1.72 |
Histological findings of the liver in two groups mice
| Control group ( | Sitagliptin group ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatic steatosis | 6/6 (100) | 6/6 (100) |
| Grade 1 | 0 (0) | 5 (83.3) |
| Grade 2 | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) |
| Grade 3 | 1 ((16.7) | 0 (0) |
| Necroinflammation | 0/6 (0) | 0/6 (0) |
| Grade 1 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Grade 2 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Grade 3 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Ballooning degeneration | 0/6 (0) | 0/6 (0) |
| Fibrosis | 0/6 (0) | 0/6 (0) |
The numbers are expressed as number of subjects and percentage.
Fig. 2Effects of a diet containing sitagliptin of a diet on the livers of ob/ob mice. Hematoxylin and Eosin staining (original magnification ×150).
Fig. 3Expression of proinflammatory mRNA in specimens of hepatic tissue evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR. (a) TNF-α (b) IFN-γ (c) IL-1β and (d) IL-6. The results shown represent mean ± SD of relative levels of target mRNA of six mice per group. *p<0.05 vs Sitagliptin group.
Fig. 4Expression of lipogenic-related mRNA in specimens of hepatic tissue evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR. (a) SREBP-1c (b) FAS (c) ChREBP (d) PPAR-α (e) PPAR-γ and (f) SCD1. The results shown represent mean ± SD of relative levels of target mRNA for six mice per group. *p<0.05 vs Sitagliptin group.
Fig. 5Expression of fatty acid β-oxidation-related mRNA in specimens of hepatic tissue evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR. (a) ACL (b) ACC1 (c) CPT1A and (d) CPT1B. The results shown represent mean ± SD of relative levels of target mRNA for six mice per group. *p<0.05 vs Sitagliptin group.
Fig. 6Expression of insulin signaling-related mRNA in specimans of hepatic tissue evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR. (a) IRS-1 (b)IRS-2 (c) PI3K and (d) AMPK. The results shown represent mean ± SD of relative levels of target mRNA for six mice per group. *p<0.05 vs Sitagliptin group.
Fig. 7Expression of mitochondrial β-oxidation-related mRNA in specimens of hepatic tissue evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR. (a) acyl-CoA synthetase (b) MCAD (c) LCAD (d) ECH (e) HAD and (f) 3-KAT. The results shown represent mean ± SD of relative levels of target mRNA from six mice per group. *p<0.05 vs Sitagliptin group.
Fig. 8Levels of plasma GLP-1 concentration between both groups. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (*p<0.05).
Fig. 9Western blotting analysis of liver content of ChREBP, SREBP-1c, ACC1 and FAS in both groups.
Fig. 10Levels of plasma acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA between the two groups. (a) Levels of plasma acetyl-CoA were measured in both groups. (b) Levels of plasma malonyl-CoA were measured in both groups. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (*p<0.05).