Literature DB >> 26566017

Pentachlorophenol from an old henhouse as a dioxin source in eggs and related human exposure.

Jadwiga Piskorska-Pliszczynska1, Pawel Strucinski2, Szczepan Mikolajczyk3, Sebastian Maszewski3, Jaroslaw Rachubik3, Marek Pajurek3.   

Abstract

High levels of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) were detected in free-range eggs, and these levels reached a concentration of 29.84 ± 7.45 pg of WHO-TEQ/g of fat. This value exceeded the EU maximum permitted level of 2.5 pg of WHO-TEQ/g of fat for PCDD/F congeners by twelve-fold. A chemical analysis (HRGC-HRMS) revealed elevated amounts of OCDD, OCDF, HxCDD, HpCDD and HpCDF. During the investigation, samples of feed, soil, wall scrapings, wooden ceiling of the henhouse and tissues from laying hens were examined for dioxin contents (30 samples altogether). The long and complicated investigation found that the source of dioxins in the poultry farm was pentachlorophenol-treated wood, which was used as structural components in the 40-year-old farm building adapted to a henhouse. The wooden building material contained PCDD/Fs at a concentration of 3922.60 ± 560.93 pg of WHO-TEQ/g and 11.0 ± 2.8 μg/kg of PCP. The potential risk associated with dioxin intake was characterized by comparing the theoretically calculated weekly and monthly intakes with the toxicological reference values (TRVs), namely the Tolerable Weekly Intake (TWI) and Provisional Tolerable Monthly Intake (PTMI) values of 14 pg of WHO-TEQ/kg of bw and 70 pg of WHO-TEQ/kg of bw, respectively. The intake of dioxins estimated for high egg consumers (approximately 5-6 eggs/week) exceeded the TWI and PTMI values, which may pose a risk of delayed adverse health effects. The estimated dose of PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs for children consuming 5 eggs per week exceeded the TWI by as much as 450% because of their nearly 5-fold-lower body weight. Although the dioxin intake estimated for the average consumption of eggs in the general population did not exceed any of the TRVs applied (58.7% TWI and 51.1% PTMI), such a situation should be considered unacceptable from a public health perspective because eggs are not the only source of these contaminants.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dioxins; Eggs; Exposure; Food; Pentachlorophenol; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26566017     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing the relevance of dioxin and PCB sources for food from animal origin and the need for their inventory, control and management.

Authors:  Roland Weber; Christine Herold; Henner Hollert; Josef Kamphues; Markus Blepp; Karlheinz Ballschmiter
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.893

2.  Application of the AhR Reporter Gene Assay for the Determination of PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs in Feed Samples.

Authors:  Jadwiga Piskorska-Pliszczyńska; Paweł Małagocki; Beata Furga; Magdalena Gembal; Joanna Cebulska
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 1.744

3.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Transcriptional Changes and Genes That Contribute to Fitness during Degradation of the Anthropogenic Pollutant Pentachlorophenol by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum.

Authors:  Jake J Flood; Shelley D Copley
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.496

4.  Typical Soil Redox Processes in Pentachlorophenol Polluted Soil Following Biochar Addition.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Lujun Zhang; Liwei Zheng; Ying Zhuo; Jianming Xu; Yan He
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Potential contaminants and hazards in alternative chicken bedding materials and proposed guidance levels: a review.

Authors:  Priscilla F Gerber; Nic Gould; Eugene McGahan
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Environmental Contamination of Free-range Hen with Dioxin.

Authors:  Szczepan Mikołajczyk; Marek Pajurek; Małgorzata Warenik-Bany; Sebastian Maszewski
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.744

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.