| Literature DB >> 26565712 |
Huan-Yan Xu1, Li-Cheng Wu1, Hang Zhao1, Li-Guo Jin1, Shu-Yan Qi1.
Abstract
Graphitic carbon nitride (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26565712 PMCID: PMC4643995 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1XRD patterns of g-C3N4 samples derived from different precursors at different temperatures.
(a) Dicyandiamide. (b) Melamine.
Crystallite size, surface area and band gap of g-C3N4 derived from different precursors at different pyrolysis temperatures.
| Sample | Crystallite Size (nm) | Surface Area (m2/g) | Band Gap (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN-D460 | 5.05 | 4.95 | 2.76 |
| CN-D500 | 6.36 | 10.59 | 2.71 |
| CN-D540 | 6.39 | 10.73 | 2.57 |
| CN-D580 | 7.04 | 23.19 | 2.56 |
| CN-M460 | 5.32 | 7.26 | 2.75 |
| CN-M500 | 8.01 | 23.17 | 2.71 |
| CN-M540 | 8.16 | 23.50 | 2.62 |
| CN-M580 | 8.17 | 26.02 | 2.60 |
Fig 2Polycondensation route for the formation of g-C3N4 from dicyandiamide and melamine.
Fig 3FT-IR spectra of g-C3N4 samples pyrolyzed from different precursors at different temperatures.
(a) Dicyandiamide. (b) Melamine.
Fig 4SEM images of g-C3N4 samples.
(a) CN-D460. (b) CN-D500. (c) CN-D540. (d) CN-D580. (e) CN-M460. (f) CN-M500. (g) CN-M540. (h) CN-M580.
Fig 5TEM and HRTEM (inset) images of g-C3N4 samples.
(a) CN-D500. (b) CN-M500.
Fig 6XPS spectra of CN-M500 and CN-D500.
(a) survey (b) C1s (c) N1s, (d) O1s.
Fig 7DRS spectra of g-C3N4 samples pyrolyzed from different precursors at different temperatures.
The insets exhibit the relationships between [F(R)·hυ]0.5 and photon energy (hυ). (a) Dicyandiamide. (b) Melamine.
Fig 8Evaluation of adsorption capacity and photocatalytic activity for g-C3N4 samples.
(a) Sample derived from dicyandiamide at different temperatures (b) Sample derived from melamine at different temperatures. (c) Comparative analysis of adsorption capacity and photocatalytic activity between CN-D500 and CN-M500. All the experiments were conducted at the pristine pH value of MB solution with g-C3N4 dosage of 1.0g/L and initial MB concentration of 5mg/L.
Fig 9Evaluation of photocatalytic characters of CN-M500 sample.
(a) Effect of initial MB concentration on the photocatalytic activity of CN-M500 at pristine pH of MB solution with g-C3N4 dosage of 1.0g/L; (b) Effect of photocatalyst dosage on the photocatalytic activity of CN-M500 at pristine pH of MB solution with initial MB concentration of 5mg/L; (c) UV-Vis absorption spectra of MB after different periods of the photocatalytic decomposition over CN-M500 at the pristine pH value of MB solution with g-C3N4 dosage of 1.0g/L and initial MB concentration of 5mg/L (inset: the color change of MB solution during reaction process); and (d) Recycle tests for CN-M500 sample under exactly identical conditions with the solid photocatalyst repeatedly washed by deionized water, centrifuged and dried after used once before.
Fig 10Adsorption and photocatalysis of different dyes over CN-M500.
(a) Control experiments of adsorption and photocatalysis after reaching MB adsorption equilibrium with g-C3N4 dosage of 1.0 g/L and initial MB concentration of 5mg/L at pristine solution pH. Adsorption (45 min before light on) and photocatalysis (75 min after light on) of the (b) cationic dye MB and (c) anionic dye MO over CN-M500 at different medium pHs with the same g-C3N4 dosage (1.0 g/L) and initial dye concentration (5mg/L). And, the curves in (b) and (c) present the surface Zeta potentials of CN-M500 at different solution pHs.
Fig 11Schematic diagram for the photocatalytic degradation of dye molecules over g-C3N4 sample.
The synergy between electrostatic adsorption and photocatalysis under visible light facilitates the decomposition of dye molecules.