| Literature DB >> 26565407 |
.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26565407 PMCID: PMC4643887 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 9Sample results from the RootAnalyzer algorithm.
(a) the entire root section analysed. The magenta rectangle in the bottom image denotes a small piece of segregated root that the algorithm has failed to capture. (b) zoomed versions of the respective stele regions highlighting cortical cells (red), epidermal cells (orange), stele cells (blue) and central metaxylems (green).
Fig 12Percentage errors in evaluating average area of cortex cells.
13 of the 15 images produce a much lower degree of error in average cortex cell area calculation. The two red markers of significant error correspond to poor quality (i.e., damaged) root images.
Fig 10RootScan and RootAnalyzer applied to a sample maize image.
(a) The original image. (b) Results from RootScan. (c) Results of RootAnalyzer.
Fig 11Two images from the set of 15 showing damaged roots.
The two images depict damaged root cross-sections with missing or displaced epidermis and cortex regions. The damaged sections are major factors contributing to the relatively large errors in cortex (and presumably epidermis) cell calculations.