J M Coutinho1, D S Liebeskind2, L-A Slater1, R G Nogueira3, B W Baxter4, E I Levy5, A H Siddiqui6, M Goyal7, O O Zaidat8, A Davalos9, A Bonafé10, R Jahan11, J Gralla12, J L Saver13, V M Pereira14. 1. From the Divisions of Neuroradiology (J.M.C., L.-A.S., V.M.P.). 2. Neurovascular Imaging Research Core and the University of California, Los Angeles Stroke Center (D.S.L.), Los Angeles, California. 3. Marcus Stroke and Neuroscience Center (R.G.N.), Department of Neurology, Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Department of Radiology (B.W.B.), Erlanger Hospital at University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, Tennessee. 5. Department of Neurosurgery (E.I.L., A.H.S.). 6. Department of Neurosurgery (E.I.L., A.H.S.) Toshiba Stroke and Vascular Research Center (A.H.S.), State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York. 7. Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences (M.G.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 8. Department of Neurology (O.O.Z.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 9. Department of Neurosciences (A.D.), Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. 10. Department of Neuroradiology (A.B.), Hôpital Gui-de-Chauliac, Montpellier, France. 11. Division of Interventional Neuroradiology (R.J.). 12. Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (J.G.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 13. Department of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center (J.L.S.), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 14. From the Divisions of Neuroradiology (J.M.C., L.-A.S., V.M.P.) Neurosurgery (V.M.P.), Department of Medical Imaging and Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada vitormpbr@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy is beneficial for patients with acute ischemic stroke and a proximal anterior occlusion, but it is unclear if these results can be extrapolated to patients with an M2 occlusion. The purpose of this study was to examine the technical aspects, safety, and outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy with a stent retriever in patients with an isolated M2 occlusion who were included in 3 large multicenter prospective studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients from the Solitaire Flow Restoration Thrombectomy for Acute Revascularization (STAR), Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy (SWIFT), and Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment (SWIFT PRIME) studies, 3 large multicenter prospective studies on thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. We compared outcomes and technical details of patients with an M2 with those with an M1 occlusion. All patients were treated with a stent retriever. Imaging data and outcomes were scored by an independent core laboratory. Successful reperfusion was defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/3. RESULTS: We included 50 patients with an M2 and 249 patients with an M1 occlusion. Patients with an M2 occlusion were older (mean age, 71 versus 67 years; P = .04) and had a lower NIHSS score (median, 13 versus 17; P < .001) compared with those with an M1 occlusion. Procedural time was nonsignificantly shorter in patients with an M2 occlusion (median, 29 versus 35 minutes; P = .41). The average number of passes with a stent retriever was also nonsignificantly lower in patients with an M2 occlusion (mean, 1.4 versus 1.7; P = .07). There were no significant differences in successful reperfusion (85% versus 82%, P = .82), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages (2% versus 2%, P = 1.0), device-related serious adverse events (6% versus 4%, P = .46), or modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 at follow-up (60% versus 56%, P = .64). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular reperfusion therapy appears to be feasible in selected patients with ischemic stroke and an M2 occlusion.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy is beneficial for patients with acute ischemic stroke and a proximal anterior occlusion, but it is unclear if these results can be extrapolated to patients with an M2 occlusion. The purpose of this study was to examine the technical aspects, safety, and outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy with a stent retriever in patients with an isolated M2 occlusion who were included in 3 large multicenter prospective studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients from the Solitaire Flow Restoration Thrombectomy for Acute Revascularization (STAR), Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy (SWIFT), and Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment (SWIFT PRIME) studies, 3 large multicenter prospective studies on thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. We compared outcomes and technical details of patients with an M2 with those with an M1 occlusion. All patients were treated with a stent retriever. Imaging data and outcomes were scored by an independent core laboratory. Successful reperfusion was defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/3. RESULTS: We included 50 patients with an M2 and 249 patients with an M1 occlusion. Patients with an M2 occlusion were older (mean age, 71 versus 67 years; P = .04) and had a lower NIHSS score (median, 13 versus 17; P < .001) compared with those with an M1 occlusion. Procedural time was nonsignificantly shorter in patients with an M2 occlusion (median, 29 versus 35 minutes; P = .41). The average number of passes with a stent retriever was also nonsignificantly lower in patients with an M2 occlusion (mean, 1.4 versus 1.7; P = .07). There were no significant differences in successful reperfusion (85% versus 82%, P = .82), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages (2% versus 2%, P = 1.0), device-related serious adverse events (6% versus 4%, P = .46), or modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 at follow-up (60% versus 56%, P = .64). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular reperfusion therapy appears to be feasible in selected patients with ischemic stroke and an M2 occlusion.
Authors: Ralph Rahme; Sharon D Yeatts; Todd A Abruzzo; Lincoln Jimenez; Liqiong Fan; Thomas A Tomsick; Andrew J Ringer; Anthony J Furlan; Joseph P Broderick; Pooja Khatri Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Vitor M Pereira; Jan Gralla; Antoni Davalos; Alain Bonafé; Carlos Castaño; René Chapot; David S Liebeskind; Raul G Nogueira; Marcel Arnold; Roman Sztajzel; Thomas Liebig; Mayank Goyal; Michael Besselmann; Antonio Moreno; Alfredo Moreno; Gerhard Schroth Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tudor G Jovin; Angel Chamorro; Erik Cobo; María A de Miquel; Carlos A Molina; Alex Rovira; Luis San Román; Joaquín Serena; Sonia Abilleira; Marc Ribó; Mònica Millán; Xabier Urra; Pere Cardona; Elena López-Cancio; Alejandro Tomasello; Carlos Castaño; Jordi Blasco; Lucía Aja; Laura Dorado; Helena Quesada; Marta Rubiera; María Hernandez-Pérez; Mayank Goyal; Andrew M Demchuk; Rüdiger von Kummer; Miquel Gallofré; Antoni Dávalos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mayank Goyal; Andrew M Demchuk; Bijoy K Menon; Muneer Eesa; Jeremy L Rempel; John Thornton; Daniel Roy; Tudor G Jovin; Robert A Willinsky; Biggya L Sapkota; Dar Dowlatshahi; Donald F Frei; Noreen R Kamal; Walter J Montanera; Alexandre Y Poppe; Karla J Ryckborst; Frank L Silver; Ashfaq Shuaib; Donatella Tampieri; David Williams; Oh Young Bang; Blaise W Baxter; Paul A Burns; Hana Choe; Ji-Hoe Heo; Christine A Holmstedt; Brian Jankowitz; Michael Kelly; Guillermo Linares; Jennifer L Mandzia; Jai Shankar; Sung-Il Sohn; Richard H Swartz; Philip A Barber; Shelagh B Coutts; Eric E Smith; William F Morrish; Alain Weill; Suresh Subramaniam; Alim P Mitha; John H Wong; Mark W Lowerison; Tolulope T Sajobi; Michael D Hill Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alan Flores; Alejandro Tomasello; Pere Cardona; M Angeles de Miquel; Meritxell Gomis; Pablo Garcia Bermejo; Victor Obach; Xabi Urra; Joan Martí-Fàbregas; David Cánovas; Jaume Roquer; Sònia Abilleira; Marc Ribó Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Sunil A Sheth; Bryan Yoo; Jeffrey L Saver; Sidney Starkman; Latisha K Ali; Doojin Kim; Nestor R Gonzalez; Reza Jahan; Satoshi Tateshima; Gary Duckwiler; Fernando Vinuela; David S Liebeskind Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Wolfgang G Kunz; Wieland H Sommer; Lukas Havla; Franziska Dorn; Felix G Meinel; Olaf Dietrich; Grete Buchholz; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Kolja M Thierfelder Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: D Sacks; B Baxter; B C V Campbell; J S Carpenter; C Cognard; D Dippel; M Eesa; U Fischer; K Hausegger; J A Hirsch; M S Hussain; O Jansen; M V Jayaraman; A A Khalessi; B W Kluck; S Lavine; P M Meyers; S Ramee; D A Rüfenacht; C M Schirmer; D Vorwerk Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mayank Goyal; Mohammed A Almekhlafi; Christoph Cognard; Ryan McTaggart; Kristine Blackham; Alessandra Biondi; Aad van der Lugt; Charles B L M Majoie; Wim H van Zwam; H Bart van der Worp; Michael D Hill Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Johannes Kaesmacher; Christian Maegerlein; Felix Zibold; Silke Wunderlich; Claus Zimmer; Benjamin Friedrich Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Almekhlafi; J M Ospel; G Saposnik; N Kashani; A Demchuk; M D Hill; M Goyal; B K Menon Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Tasneem F Hasan; Nathaniel Todnem; Neethu Gopal; David A Miller; Sukhwinder S Sandhu; Josephine F Huang; Rabih G Tawk Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 2.931