Literature DB >> 26564182

Impact of water composition on association of Ag and CeO₂ nanoparticles with aquatic macrophyte Elodea canadensis.

Frederik Van Koetsem1, Yi Xiao2,3, Zhuanxi Luo3, Gijs Du Laing2.   

Abstract

In this study, the potential association of (citrate-stabilized) Ag (14.1 ± 1.0 nm) and CeO2 (6.7 ± 1.2 nm) engineered nanoparticles (ENPs), or their ionic counterparts, with the submerged aquatic plant Elodea canadensis, was examined and, in particular, parameters affecting the distribution of the nanoparticles (or metal ions) between plant biomass and the water phase were assessed using five distinct aqueous matrices (i.e. tap water, 10 % Hoagland's solution and three natural surface water samples). Individual plants were exposed to varying concentrations of Ag and CeO2 ENPs or Ag(+) and Ce(3+) ions during 72-h-lasting batch experiments. A dose-dependent increase of silver or cerium in plant biomass was observed for both the nanoparticles and the ions, whereby exposure to the latter systematically resulted in significantly higher biomass concentrations. Furthermore, the apparent plant uptake of CeO2 ENPs appeared to be higher than that for Ag ENPs when comparing similar exposure concentrations. These findings suggest that association with E. canadensis might be affected by particle characteristics such as size, composition, surface charge or surface coating. Moreover, the stability of the ENPs or ions in suspension/solution may be another important aspect affecting plant exposure and uptake. The association of the nanoparticles or ions with E. canadensis was affected by the physicochemical characteristics of the water sample. The silver biomass concentration was found to correlate significantly with the electrical conductivity (EC), dry residue (DR) and Cl(-), K, Na and Mg content in the case of Ag ENPs or with the EC, inorganic carbon (IC) and Cl(-), NO3 (-), Na and Mg content in the case of Ag(+) ions, whereas significant relationships between the cerium biomass concentration and the EC, DR, IC and Ca content or the pH, EC, DR, IC and Cl(-), Ca and Mg content were obtained for CeO2 ENPs or Ce(3+) ions, respectively. Results also indicated that the Ag ENPs and Ag(+) ions might potentially be toxic towards E. canadensis whereas no evidence of phytotoxicity was noted in the case of CeO2 ENPs or Ce(3+) ions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic plant; Cerium dioxide; Nanoparticles; Plant uptake; Silver; Surface water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26564182     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5708-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  48 in total

Review 1.  Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects.

Authors:  Stephen J Klaine; Pedro J J Alvarez; Graeme E Batley; Teresa F Fernandes; Richard D Handy; Delina Y Lyon; Shaily Mahendra; Michael J McLaughlin; Jamie R Lead
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices.

Authors:  Arturo A Keller; Hongtao Wang; Dongxu Zhou; Hunter S Lenihan; Gary Cherr; Bradley J Cardinale; Robert Miller; Zhaoxia Ji
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Plant nanotoxicology.

Authors:  Karl-Josef Dietz; Simone Herth
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  Preparation and Characterization Challenges to Understanding Environmental and Biological Impacts of Nanoparticles.

Authors:  A S Karakoti; P Munusamy; K Hostetler; V Kodali; S Kuchibhatla; G Orr; J G Pounds; J G Teeguarden; B D Thrall; D R Baer
Journal:  Surf Interface Anal       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.607

Review 5.  Toxicity, Uptake, and Translocation of Engineered Nanomaterials in Vascular plants.

Authors:  Pola Miralles; Tamara L Church; Andrew T Harris
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Physiological analysis of silver nanoparticles and AgNO3 toxicity to Spirodela polyrhiza.

Authors:  Hong-Sheng Jiang; Ming Li; Feng-Yi Chang; Wei Li; Li-Yan Yin
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 7.  Environmental transformations of silver nanoparticles: impact on stability and toxicity.

Authors:  Clément Levard; E Matt Hotze; Gregory V Lowry; Gordon E Brown
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Solubility and batch retention of CeO2 nanoparticles in soils.

Authors:  Geert Cornelis; Brooke Ryan; Mike J McLaughlin; Jason K Kirby; Douglas Beak; David Chittleborough
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Impact of environmental conditions (pH, ionic strength, and electrolyte type) on the surface charge and aggregation of silver nanoparticles suspensions.

Authors:  Amro M El Badawy; Todd P Luxton; Rendahandi G Silva; Kirk G Scheckel; Makram T Suidan; Thabet M Tolaymat
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles.

Authors:  Daohui Lin; Baoshan Xing
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.