Aurélie Chaudet1, Guillaume Bouhours1, Emmanuel Rineau1, Jean-François Hamel2, Damien Leblanc1, Vincent Steiger3, Sigismond Lasocki4. 1. Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, LUNAM université, université d'Angers, CHU d'Angers, 49000 Angers, France. 2. Centre de recherche clinique, LUNAM université, université d'Angers, CHU d'Angers, 49000 Angers, France. 3. Département de chirurgie osseuse, LUNAM université, université d'Angers, CHU d'Angers, 49000 Angers, France. 4. Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, LUNAM université, université d'Angers, CHU d'Angers, 49000 Angers, France. Electronic address: sigismond@lasocki.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Upon arrival at the emergency department, hip-fracture pain relief is usually carried out via systemic opioids. Continuous nerve blocks are efficient in the postoperative period, but have not been evaluated preoperatively. This study compared the reduction in morphine consumption and related side effects of a continuous femoral block with a single shot block in hip-fracture patients. METHODS:Hip-fracture patients admitted to the emergency department received afemoral nerve catheter, with a single lidocaine injection. They were then randomized to ropivacaine (group R) or saline continuous infusion (placebo, group P) in a double-blind manner. Morphine consumption and side effects were prospectively collected until the 24th postoperative hour. RESULTS:Sixty patients were included and 55 analyzed. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding fracture types, delay before surgery (median [Q1-Q3]: 21.3 [14.5-29.4] versus 20.8 [15.7-36.2] hours for groups R and P, respectively; P=0.87) and catheter duration (47.5 [39.8-52.4] versus 42.5 [32.1-50.5] hours, P=0.29). Total morphine consumption was not significantly decreased in group R (5 [0-14] versus 8 [4.5-11] mg, P=0.3) and pain scores were similar (mean±SD; VAS 29±15/100 versus 33±13, P=0.3). We observed a significant reduction in morphine adverse effects (31% versus 69% for groups R and P, respectively; P<0.01), mainly nausea (31% versus 59%, P=0.03). One morphine side effect could be avoided for every 5 patients treated. CONCLUSION:Preoperative continuous femoral blockades using ropivacaine reduce morphine side effects (mainly nausea) in hip-fracture patients without reducing morphine consumption.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Upon arrival at the emergency department, hip-fracture pain relief is usually carried out via systemic opioids. Continuous nerve blocks are efficient in the postoperative period, but have not been evaluated preoperatively. This study compared the reduction in morphine consumption and related side effects of a continuous femoral block with a single shot block in hip-fracturepatients. METHODS:Hip-fracturepatients admitted to the emergency department received a femoral nerve catheter, with a single lidocaine injection. They were then randomized to ropivacaine (group R) or saline continuous infusion (placebo, group P) in a double-blind manner. Morphine consumption and side effects were prospectively collected until the 24th postoperative hour. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included and 55 analyzed. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding fracture types, delay before surgery (median [Q1-Q3]: 21.3 [14.5-29.4] versus 20.8 [15.7-36.2] hours for groups R and P, respectively; P=0.87) and catheter duration (47.5 [39.8-52.4] versus 42.5 [32.1-50.5] hours, P=0.29). Total morphine consumption was not significantly decreased in group R (5 [0-14] versus 8 [4.5-11] mg, P=0.3) and pain scores were similar (mean±SD; VAS 29±15/100 versus 33±13, P=0.3). We observed a significant reduction in morphine adverse effects (31% versus 69% for groups R and P, respectively; P<0.01), mainly nausea (31% versus 59%, P=0.03). One morphine side effect could be avoided for every 5 patients treated. CONCLUSION: Preoperative continuous femoral blockades using ropivacaine reduce morphine side effects (mainly nausea) in hip-fracturepatients without reducing morphine consumption.
Authors: Benedikt Büttner; Joschka Dracklé; Katalin Kristof; José Hinz; Alexander Schwarz; Martin Bauer; Ashham Mansur; Ingo Bergmann Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Bridie Angela Evans; Alan Brown; Jenna Bulger; Greg Fegan; Simon Ford; Katy Guy; SIan Jones; Leigh Keen; Ashrafunnesa Khanom; Mirella Longo; Ian Pallister; Nigel Rees; Ian T Russell; Anne C Seagrove; Alan Watkins; Helen Snooks Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mark Kingston; Jenna Jones; Sarah Black; Bridie Evans; Simon Ford; Theresa Foster; Steve Goodacre; Marie-Louise Jones; Sian Jones; Leigh Keen; Mirella Longo; Ronan A Lyons; Ian Pallister; Nigel Rees; Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena; Alan Watkins; Julia Williams; Helen Wilson; Helen Snooks Journal: Trials Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 2.728
Authors: Lauren T Southerland; Katherine K Benson; Austin J Schoeffler; Margaret A Lashutka; Soo Borson; Jason J Bischof Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2022-07-29
Authors: Martin Rowlands; Gerrie van de Walt; Jim Bradley; Alexa Mannings; Sarah Armstrong; Nigel Bedforth; Iain K Moppett; Opinder Sahota Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Bridie Angela Evans; Alan Brown; Greg Fegan; Simon Ford; Katy Guy; Jenna Jones; Sian Jones; Leigh Keen; Ashrafunnesa Khanom; Mirella Longo; Ian Pallister; Nigel Rees; Ian T Russell; Anne C Seagrove; Alan Watkins; Helen Snooks Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Gioia Häusler; Puck C R van der Vet; Frank J P Beeres; Thomas Kaufman; Jip Q Kusen; Beate Poblete Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 2.374