| Literature DB >> 26563585 |
Marco Fritzsche1, Ricardo A Fernandes1, Huw Colin-York1, Ana M Santos1, Steven F Lee2, B Christoffer Lagerholm3, Simon J Davis1, Christian Eggeling1,3.
Abstract
Detecting intracellular calcium signaling with fluorescent calcium indicator dyes is often coupled with microscopy techniques to follow the activation state of non-excitable cells, including lymphocytes. However, the analysis of global intracellular calcium responses both at the single-cell level and in large ensembles simultaneously has yet to be automated. Here, we present a new software package, CalQuo (Calcium Quantification), which allows the automated analysis and simultaneous monitoring of global fluorescent calcium reporter-based signaling responses in up to 1000 single cells per experiment, at temporal resolutions of sub-seconds to seconds. CalQuo quantifies the number and fraction of responding cells, the temporal dependence of calcium signaling and provides global and individual calcium-reporter fluorescence intensity profiles. We demonstrate the utility of the new method by comparing the calcium-based signaling responses of genetically manipulated human lymphocytic cell lines.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26563585 PMCID: PMC4643230 DOI: 10.1038/srep16487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Observing global calcium release in T-cells using CalQuo.
(a) Maximum projections of fluorescence intensity over time from Fluo-4 loaded Jurkat (upper left), J.Cam1.6 (lower left), J.Cam1.6-wthLCK with restored signaling ability (upper right), and J.Cam1.6-TCRbkd-Lck with reduced TCRβ chain (lower right) when landing on the activating antibody-coated microscope cover glass, as measured by a spinning disc confocal fluorescence microscope, whose sampling plane was put on the cover glass. Low to warm colors represent low to high fluorescence intensities. Moving and triggering T-cells can be identified by a red dot with a blue tail. (b) Raw response data R(t) from different individual cells demonstrating the different analysis step: raw data (upper panel), data following Savitzky–Golay interpolation (middle panel) and normalised interpolated data (lower panel). (c) Representative intensity profiles R(t) (upper panel) and their derivatives dR(t)/dt (lower panel); average over 200-650 individual T-cells (black circles: raw data, mangenta line: Savitzky–Golay interpolation for signaling T-cells, purple line: data of non-signaling cells). CalQuo determines the characteristic times for the landing (grey shaded area) and signaling event (magenta shaded area) from the characteristic peaks in dR(t)/dt. Error bars representing s.d.m. (d) Representative response functions R(t) of a calcium releasing cell analyzed for different time resolutions 0.5 s–60 s, as indicated. The ability to identify calcium response decreases with decreasing time resolution, as revealed by (e) the fraction of signaling, i.e. calcium-releasing cells determined from the same data set for different time resolutions as shown in (e).
Figure 2CalQuo output for the different types of T-cells.
Average response functions R(t) (a) and fraction of signaling, i.e. calcium-releasing cells (b). Error bars as s.d.m. over 200–650 cells (see Table 1).
Figure 3CalQuo output for the different types of T-cells:
Triggering time T (i.e. time between landing and signaling) for the fraction of signaling cells; histogram (a) and corresponding boxplots (b). Error bars as s.d.m. over 200–650 cells (see Table 1).
Average and s.d.m. of the fraction of calcium responding cells and the triggering times T for the different types of T-cells (N = number of cells investigated).
| Experiment | Triggeringfraction | Triggeringtime | N |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jurkat | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 113 ± 40 | 366 |
| J.Caml.6 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 191 ± 30 | 629 |
| J.Caml.6-wthLCK | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 158 ± 20 | 302 |
| J.Caml.6-TCRk | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 163 ± 20 | 213 |