Literature DB >> 26562899

Variation in Photos of the Same Face Drives Improvements in Identity Verification.

Nadia Menon1, David White2, Richard I Kemp2.   

Abstract

People are poor at matching the identity of unfamiliar faces, but very good at identifying familiar faces. Theoretical accounts suggest that representations derived from exposure to variation are instrumental in driving this familiarity based improvement. In support of this, recent work shows that providing multiple photographs of an unfamiliar face improves identity verification accuracy. Here, we test whether the extent of variation is critical to this improvement, by manipulating the degree of within-identity variation that participants are exposed to in a sequential matching test. Participants were more accurate and adopted more liberal response criteria, when matching high-variability pairs to probe images, compared with either low-variability pairs or single images. Importantly, benefits of variation are not explained by independent contributions of single images, suggesting that people extrapolate information across images to produce gains in identification accuracy. These results suggest that photo-ID can be improved by incorporating broader ranges of variation in facial appearance.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Unfamiliar face matching; face representations; face variability; identity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26562899     DOI: 10.1177/0301006615599902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  8 in total

1.  The pairs training effect in unfamiliar face matching.

Authors:  Kay L Ritchie; Tessa R Flack; Elizabeth A Fuller; Charlotte Cartledge; Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Dynamic Emotional Faces Generalise Better to a New Expression but not to a New View.

Authors:  Chang Hong Liu; Wenfeng Chen; James Ward; Nozomi Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs.

Authors:  Dawn R Weatherford; William Blake Erickson; Jasmyne Thomas; Mary E Walker; Barret Schein
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-01-28

4.  When experience does not promote expertise: security professionals fail to detect low prevalence fake IDs.

Authors:  Dawn R Weatherford; Devin Roberson; William Blake Erickson
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-04-01

5.  Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  More than a sum of parts: robust face recognition by integrating variation.

Authors:  Nadia Menon; Richard I Kemp; David White
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Photo ID verification remains challenging despite years of practice.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

8.  Face search in CCTV surveillance.

Authors:  Mila Mileva; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-09-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.