Literature DB >> 26562860

Attending at a Low Intensity Increases Impulsivity in an Auditory Sustained Attention to Response Task.

Hettie Roebuck1, Kun Guo2, Patrick Bourke2.   

Abstract

Why attention lapses during prolonged tasks is debated, specifically whether errors are a consequence of under-arousal or exerted effort. To explore this, we investigated whether increased impulsivity is associated with effortful processing by modifying the demand of a task by presenting it at a quiet intensity. Here, we consider whether attending at low but detectable levels affects impulsivity in a population with intact hearing. A modification of the Sustained Attention to Response Task was used with auditory stimuli at two levels: the participants' personal "lowest detectable" level and a "normal speaking" level. At the quiet intensity, we found that more impulsive responses were made compared with listening at a normal speaking level. These errors were not due to a failure in discrimination. The findings suggest an increase in processing time for auditory stimuli at low levels that exceeds the time needed to interrupt a planned habitual motor response. This leads to a more impulsive and erroneous response style. These findings have important implications for understanding the nature of impulsivity in relation to effortful processing. They may explain why a high proportion of individuals with hearing loss are also diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sustained Attention to Response Task; auditory attention; effortful listening; impulsivity; sustained attention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26562860     DOI: 10.1177/0301006615602623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  2 in total

1.  Probe-caught spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering in relation to self-reported inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive traits in adults.

Authors:  Gizem Arabacı; Benjamin A Parris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Processing time not modality dominates shift costs in the modality-shifting effect.

Authors:  Hettie Roebuck; Kun Guo; Patrick Bourke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-12-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.