Christie Mettenbrink1, Alia Al-Tayyib, Jeffrey Eggert, Mark Thrun. 1. From the *Denver Public Health, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO; †Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO; and ‡Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Federal health reform has the potential to impact many public health services, especially sexual health clinics. To assess the impact of such reform within the Denver Sexual Health Clinic (DSHC), we conducted a survey of patients to better understand our client population and their care-seeking behavior. METHODS: Survey data were collected from patients attending the DSHC at 3 different points in time to ascertain insurance status, reasons for not having insurance, reasons for choosing care at the DSHC, and health care use over the past 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 1603 surveys were completed. Forty-two percent of participants were enrolled in health insurance at the time of visit. The percentage of patients with Medicaid increased more than 200% across the survey cycles. Cost was the main reason cited for not having insurance. Participants identified confidentiality and convenience among the top reasons for seeking care at the DSHC regardless of sex or insurance. Although there was no difference in health care use for sexual health services, individuals with health insurance were more likely to have used nonsexual health services in the past 12 months than those without insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients continue to visit the DSHC despite having health insurance. Sexual health clinics must work to understand what drives people to seek care so that they can better prepare for the future.
INTRODUCTION: Federal health reform has the potential to impact many public health services, especially sexual health clinics. To assess the impact of such reform within the Denver Sexual Health Clinic (DSHC), we conducted a survey of patients to better understand our client population and their care-seeking behavior. METHODS: Survey data were collected from patients attending the DSHC at 3 different points in time to ascertain insurance status, reasons for not having insurance, reasons for choosing care at the DSHC, and health care use over the past 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 1603 surveys were completed. Forty-two percent of participants were enrolled in health insurance at the time of visit. The percentage of patients with Medicaid increased more than 200% across the survey cycles. Cost was the main reason cited for not having insurance. Participants identified confidentiality and convenience among the top reasons for seeking care at the DSHC regardless of sex or insurance. Although there was no difference in health care use for sexual health services, individuals with health insurance were more likely to have used nonsexual health services in the past 12 months than those without insurance. CONCLUSIONS:Patients continue to visit the DSHC despite having health insurance. Sexual health clinics must work to understand what drives people to seek care so that they can better prepare for the future.
Authors: Madeline C Montgomery; Julia Raifman; Amy S Nunn; Thomas Bertrand; A Ziggy Uvin; Theodore Marak; Jaime Comella; Alexi Almonte; Philip A Chan Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Harry Jin; Brandon D L Marshall; Julia Raifman; Madeline Montgomery; Michaela A Maynard; Philip A Chan Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Lorraine T Dean; Madeline C Montgomery; Julia Raifman; Amy Nunn; Thomas Bertrand; Alexi Almonte; Philip A Chan Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Alice J Lee; Madeline C Montgomery; Rupa R Patel; Julia Raifman; Lorraine T Dean; Philip A Chan Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.868