Mingzheng Peng1, Zhao Li1, Haiyang Hu1, Sida Liu1, Binbin Xu1, Wenzhuo Zhu1, Yudong Han1, Liwen Xiong2, Qiang Lin1. 1. 1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai First People's Hospital Affiliated to The Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 2. 2 Department of Respiration, Shanghai Chest Hospital Affiliated to The Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyse the peak CT number (PEAK) in CT number histogram of ground-glass nodules (GGN), meaning the most frequent density of pixels in the image of pulmonary nodule, based on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructive model pre-operatively, and the mean rate of PEAK change (V-PEAK) during a follow-up of GGN for differential diagnosis between pre-invasive adenocarcinoma (PIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). METHODS: CT number histogram of pixels in GGN was made automatically by 3D measurement software. Diameter, total volume, PEAK and V-PEAK were measured from CT data sets of different groups classified by pathology, subtype and number of GGN, respectively. RESULTS: Among all 102 cases, 47 were PIA, including atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (n = 29) and adenocarcinoma in situ (n = 18), and 55 were IAC, including minimally IAC (MIA, n = 4). By Wilcoxon test, PEAK of IAC was significantly higher than that of PIA (p < 0.001). By receiver operating curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC) was 0.857 and threshold -820.50 Hounsfield units (HU) for differentiation between PIA and IAC. V-PEAK of IAC was unexpectedly remarkably smaller than that of PIA (p < 0.001) with AUC and threshold being 0.810 and -0.829 HU day(-1), respectively. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative PEAK and V-PEAK, which interpret and evaluate the change of volume and density of pulmonary nodule simultaneously from both exterior and interior perspectives, can help to distinguish IAC from PIA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study provided researchers of GGN another perspective, taking both volume and density of nodules into consideration for pathological evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyse the peak CT number (PEAK) in CT number histogram of ground-glass nodules (GGN), meaning the most frequent density of pixels in the image of pulmonary nodule, based on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructive model pre-operatively, and the mean rate of PEAK change (V-PEAK) during a follow-up of GGN for differential diagnosis between pre-invasive adenocarcinoma (PIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). METHODS: CT number histogram of pixels in GGN was made automatically by 3D measurement software. Diameter, total volume, PEAK and V-PEAK were measured from CT data sets of different groups classified by pathology, subtype and number of GGN, respectively. RESULTS: Among all 102 cases, 47 were PIA, including atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (n = 29) and adenocarcinoma in situ (n = 18), and 55 were IAC, including minimally IAC (MIA, n = 4). By Wilcoxon test, PEAK of IAC was significantly higher than that of PIA (p < 0.001). By receiver operating curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC) was 0.857 and threshold -820.50 Hounsfield units (HU) for differentiation between PIA and IAC. V-PEAK of IAC was unexpectedly remarkably smaller than that of PIA (p < 0.001) with AUC and threshold being 0.810 and -0.829 HU day(-1), respectively. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative PEAK and V-PEAK, which interpret and evaluate the change of volume and density of pulmonary nodule simultaneously from both exterior and interior perspectives, can help to distinguish IAC from PIA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study provided researchers of GGN another perspective, taking both volume and density of nodules into consideration for pathological evaluation.
Authors: Dag Wormanns; Gerhard Kohl; Ernst Klotz; Anke Marheine; Florian Beyer; Walter Heindel; Stefan Diederich Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-11-13 Impact factor: 5.315