BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the adrenal cortex has been assessed with measurement of salivary cortisol. So far salivary cortisol is routinely measured with immunoassay (IA). However, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (MS) is known to offer better specificity. We compared the concentrations of salivary cortisol measured by MS and IA at basal and stress induced conditions and evaluated reasons for the difference in method-dependent cortisol results. METHODS: Saliva samples (n=2703) were collected from 169 children (age range: 8-14 years; 81 healthy children; 55 with internalizing and 33 with externalizing disorders) under circadian conditions and during the Trier Social Stress Test for Children (TSST-C). Biochemical analyses were performed with MS for cortisol and cortisone, IA (IBL, RE62011) for cortisol, and enzyme kinetic assay for α-amylase. RESULTS: MS and IA showed mostly comparable results for circadian activity and TSST-C response with similar statistical power. However, IA measured cortisol concentrations about 2.39-fold higher than MS. We found that this difference in measured values between MS and IA was mainly due to different standardization of IA compared to MS. In addition, at cortisol IA concentration below 5 nmol/L, cross-reactivity with cortisone was found to contribute to the lower concordance between MS and IA. CONCLUSIONS: Immunoassay and LC-MS/MS were largely comparable in the interpretation of salivary cortisol dynamics in stress research. But the IA method revealed a restricted accuracy in the measuring range below 5 nmol/L.
BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the adrenal cortex has been assessed with measurement of salivary cortisol. So far salivary cortisol is routinely measured with immunoassay (IA). However, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (MS) is known to offer better specificity. We compared the concentrations of salivary cortisol measured by MS and IA at basal and stress induced conditions and evaluated reasons for the difference in method-dependent cortisol results. METHODS: Saliva samples (n=2703) were collected from 169 children (age range: 8-14 years; 81 healthy children; 55 with internalizing and 33 with externalizing disorders) under circadian conditions and during the Trier Social Stress Test for Children (TSST-C). Biochemical analyses were performed with MS for cortisol and cortisone, IA (IBL, RE62011) for cortisol, and enzyme kinetic assay for α-amylase. RESULTS: MS and IA showed mostly comparable results for circadian activity and TSST-C response with similar statistical power. However, IA measured cortisol concentrations about 2.39-fold higher than MS. We found that this difference in measured values between MS and IA was mainly due to different standardization of IA compared to MS. In addition, at cortisol IA concentration below 5 nmol/L, cross-reactivity with cortisone was found to contribute to the lower concordance between MS and IA. CONCLUSIONS: Immunoassay and LC-MS/MS were largely comparable in the interpretation of salivary cortisol dynamics in stress research. But the IA method revealed a restricted accuracy in the measuring range below 5 nmol/L.
Authors: Shikha Pundir; Clare R Wall; Cameron J Mitchell; Eric B Thorstensen; Ching T Lai; Donna T Geddes; David Cameron-Smith Journal: J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 2.673
Authors: Julia E Chafkin; Joseph M O'Brien; Fortunato N Medrano; Hae Yeon Lee; David S Yeager; Robert A Josephs Journal: Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Robert Miller; Tobias Stalder; Marc Jarczok; David M Almeida; Ellena Badrick; Meike Bartels; Dorret I Boomsma; Christopher L Coe; Marieke C J Dekker; Bonny Donzella; Joachim E Fischer; Megan R Gunnar; Meena Kumari; Florian Lederbogen; Christine Power; Carol D Ryff; S V Subramanian; Henning Tiemeier; Sarah E Watamura; Clemens Kirschbaum Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Ji Ho Lee; Yoon Ju Bae; So Hee Lee; Su Chin Kim; Hyun Young Lee; Ga Young Ban; Yoo Seob Shin; Hae Sim Park; Juergen Kratzsch; Young Min Ye Journal: Allergy Asthma Immunol Res Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.764
Authors: Wojciech Kiebzak; Arkadiusz Żurawski; Stanisław Głuszek; Michał Kosztołowicz; Wioletta Adamus Białek Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2021-12-02