Literature DB >> 26561883

Use of the Phantom Electrode strategy to improve bass frequency perception for music listening in cochlear implant users.

Tina Munjal, Alexis T Roy, Courtney Carver, Patpong Jiradejvong, Charles J Limb.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Phantom Electrode strategy makes use of partial bipolar stimulation on the two most apical electrodes in an effort to extend the frequency range available to cochlear implant (CI) users. This study aimed to quantify the effect of the Phantom Electrode strategy on bass frequency perception in music listening in CI users.
METHODS: Eleven adult Advanced Bionics users with the Fidelity 120 processing strategy and 16 adult normal hearing (NH) individuals participated in the study. All subjects completed the CI-multiple stimulus with hidden reference and anchor (MUSHRA), a test of an individual's ability to make discriminations in sound quality following the removal of bass frequency information. NH participants completed the CI-MUSHRA once, whereas CI users completed the task twice - once with their baseline clinical program and once with the Phantom Electrode strategy, in random order. CI users' performance was assessed in comparison with NH performance.
RESULTS: The Phantom Electrode strategy improved CI users performance on the CI-MUSHRA compared with Fidelity 120. DISCUSSION: Creation of a Phantom Electrode percept through partial bipolar stimulation of the two most apical electrodes appears to improve CI users' perception of bass frequency information in music, contributing to greater accuracy in the ability to detect alterations in musical sound quality.
CONCLUSION: The Phantom Electrode processing strategy may enhance the experience of listening to music and thus acoustic stimuli more broadly by improving perception of bass frequencies, through direction of current towards the apical portion of the cochlea beyond the termination of the electrode.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bass frequency; CI-MUSHRA; Cochlear implants; Current steering; Music perception; Phantom electrode

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26561883     DOI: 10.1179/1467010015Z.000000000270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  6 in total

1.  Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.

Authors:  Silke Klawitter; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today.

Authors:  Grant Rauterkus; Anne K Maxwell; Jacob B Kahane; Jennifer J Lentz; Moises A Arriaga
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 3.  Assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation: A review of current tools and their utilization.

Authors:  Tiffany P Hwa; Christopher Z Wen; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

4.  Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.

Authors:  Benjamin Krüger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Effect of Frequency Response Manipulations on Musical Sound Quality for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jonathan Mo; Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L D Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

Review 6.  Assessment and improvement of sound quality in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Meredith T Caldwell; Nicole T Jiam; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.