| Literature DB >> 26561511 |
Dipti Kakkar Thukral1, Shweta Dumoga1, Shelly Arora1, Krishna Chuttani1, Anil K Mishra1.
Abstract
In this work matrix based nanoparticulate polymer systems have been designed using the diacrylate derivative of the well-known biocompatible polymer, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). This has been crosslinked using bifunctional (ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate) and tetrafunctional (pentaerythritol tetraacrylate) crosslinkers in varied concentrations (10-90%) to result in a polymeric network. The crosslinked polymers thus obtained were characterized by spectroscopic techniques (NMR and FTIR) and then prepared nanoparticles by the nanoprecipitation technique. Particle size analysis showed sizes of ~150 nm (PDI < 1) (with tetrafunctional crosslinker) and ~300 nm (with bifunctional crosslinker). Both the systems however showed unimodal narrow particle size distributions with negative zeta potential values of -15.6 and -7.3 respectively. Cytotoxicity of these formulations was evaluated by MTT assay showing non-cytotoxic nature of these carrier systems. In vitro drug loading and release studies were carried out using a model chemotherapeutic drug, methotrexate(MTX). These MTX loaded nanoformulations have also been evaluated biologically with the help of in vivo studies using radiolabeling techniques (with 99mTc radionuclide). The blood kinetics profile of the formulations was studied on New Zealand Albino rabbits while the biodistribution studies were performed on balb/c mice (with EAT tumours), which revealed a hepatobiliary mode of elimination. These preliminary studies clearly demonstrated the ability of these multifunctional crosslinkers to result in tight nanosized networks with biocompatible polymers such as PEG and their potential to carry chemotherapeutic drugs.Entities:
Keywords: Crosslinkers; Methotrexate; Polyethylene glycol; Radiolabeling; Technetium
Year: 2014 PMID: 26561511 PMCID: PMC4631724 DOI: 10.1186/s12645-014-0003-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Nanotechnol ISSN: 1868-6958
Synthesis of crosslinked nanoparticles by free radical thermal polymerization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE1 | 70 | 70 | ----- | 3 |
| PE2 | 70 | 80 | ----- | 3 |
| PE3 | 70 | 90 | ----- | 3 |
| PP1 | 70 | ----- | 70 | 3 |
| PP2 | 70 | ----- | 80 | 3 |
| PP3 | 70 | ----- | 90 | 3 |
PE: EGDMA crosslinked PEGDA series; PP: PETRA crosslinked PEGDA series.
Figure 1a: FTIR spectra of PEGDA, EGDMA and crosslinked PEGDA formulations (PE). b: FTIR spectra of PEGDA, PETRA and crosslinked PEGDA formulations (PP).
Particle size and zeta potential measurements
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PE 1 | 349.0 | 1.00 | −8.85 | PP 1 | 130.3 | 1.00 | −21.5 |
| PE 2 | 305.0 | 0.48 | −7.34 | PP 2 | 154.1 | 1.00 | −15.6 |
| PE 3 | 277.5 | 0.51 | −7.99 | PP 3 | 211.8 | 0.06 | −13.5 |
Figure 2In vitro cytotoxicity of PETRA crosslinked PEGDA formulations; PP 1, PP 2 and PP 3 after 48 h of incubation.
Figure 3Anticancer activity of MTX loaded PP1 in MCF-7 cell line at (a) 12 h (b) 24 h (c) 48 h.
Figure 4In vitro Drug release profile of free MTX and MTX loaded PETRA crosslinked PEGDA formulation over 72h.
Figure 5Blood clearance profile of Tc labeled MTX and PETRA crosslinked PEGDA formulation (PP1) over a period of 24 h.
Figure 6Biodistribution of MTX loaded PETRA crosslinked PEGDA formulation (PP1) over a period of 24 h.
Figure 7The relative tumour uptake of PETRA crosslinked PEGDA formulation (PP1) compared to the contralateral normal muscle (tumour:muscle ratio) over a period of 24 h.
Figure 8Whole-body γ-scintigraphic image of balb/c mice with subcutaneous EAT tumor above the right hind leg injected with Tc labeled PETRA crosslinked PEGDA formulation.