Literature DB >> 26561080

Continuous glucose monitoring system in the operating room and intensive care unit: any difference according to measurement sites?

In-Kyung Song1, Ji-Hyun Lee1, Joo-Eun Kang1, Yang-Hyo Park1, Hee-Soo Kim1, Jin-Tae Kim2.   

Abstract

Given the benefit of glucose control in the perioperative period, we evaluated the accuracy and performance of the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) depending on different measurement sites in the operating room (OR) and in the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients over 18 years of age scheduled for elective surgery and ICU admission were enrolled prospectively. Two CGMS sensors were inserted into the subcutaneous tissue of the proximal lateral thigh and the lateral abdomen. The rate of successful measurements from thigh and abdomen in the OR and in the ICU were calculated separately. Each CGMS values were compared with the time-matched arterial blood glucose measurements. CGMS values from both measurement sites were also compared. A total of 22 patients undergoing cardiac surgeries were studied. The rate of successful measurements was higher in the ICU (73.2 %) than in the OR (66.0 %) (P = 0.01); however, that from thigh (72.9 %) and from abdomen (58.7 %) showed statistically significant difference only in the OR (P = 0.04). The Pearson correlation coefficient of thigh and abdomen versus arterial values was 0.67 and 0.60, respectively (P < 0.001). In Clarke error grid analysis, 94.6 % (89.3 % in the OR and 96.1 % in the ICU) of values from thigh fell into clinically acceptable zones compared to 93.7 % (89.0 % in the OR and 95.4 % in the ICU) from abdomen. There were no statistically significant differences in the accuracy according to measurement sites. The CGMS showed high measurement failure rate, especially in the OR. In the OR, the rate of successful measurement was higher from thigh than from abdomen. The CGMS showed low accuracy compared to arterial reference values. Nevertheless, there was no difference in the accuracy of the CGMS between two measurement sites. Perioperative performance of the CGMS still needs to be improved considering relatively low successful measurement rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood glucose; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Intensive care units; Operating rooms; Perioperative period

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26561080     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9804-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  24 in total

Review 1.  The stress response to trauma and surgery.

Authors:  J P Desborough
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Strict blood glucose control with insulin during intensive care after cardiac surgery: impact on 4-years survival, dependency on medical care, and quality-of-life.

Authors:  Catherine Ingels; Yves Debaveye; Ilse Milants; Erik Buelens; Ann Peeraer; Yves Devriendt; Tom Vanhoutte; Aurelie Van Damme; Miet Schetz; Pieter J Wouters; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Continuous glucose monitoring in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Boaz Kalmovich; Yosefa Bar-Dayan; Mona Boaz; Julio Wainstein
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Continuous glucose monitoring system in a rural intensive care unit: a pilot study evaluating accuracy and acceptance.

Authors:  Brooke Jacobs; Kim Phan; Leonard Bertheau; Godwin Dogbey; Frank Schwartz; Jay Shubrook
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

6.  Intensive intraoperative insulin therapy versus conventional glucose management during cardiac surgery: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Gunjan Y Gandhi; Gregory A Nuttall; Martin D Abel; Charles J Mullany; Hartzell V Schaff; Peter C O'Brien; Matthew G Johnson; Arthur R Williams; Susanne M Cutshall; Lisa M Mundy; Robert A Rizza; M Molly McMahon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Intensive insulin therapy for patients in paediatric intensive care: a prospective, randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Dirk Vlasselaers; Ilse Milants; Lars Desmet; Pieter J Wouters; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Ingeborg van den Heuvel; Dieter Mesotten; Michael P Casaer; Geert Meyfroidt; Catherine Ingels; Jan Muller; Sophie Van Cromphaut; Miet Schetz; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Pre- and postoperative accuracy and safety of a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system in cardiac surgical patients: a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Susan J Logtenberg; Nanne Kleefstra; Ferdinand T Snellen; Klaas H Groenier; Robbert J Slingerland; Arno P Nierich; Henk J Bilo
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients.

Authors:  Yaseen M Arabi; Ousama C Dabbagh; Hani M Tamim; Abdullah A Al-Shimemeri; Ziad A Memish; Samir H Haddad; Sofia J Syed; Hema R Giridhar; Asgar H Rishu; Mouhamad O Al-Daker; Salim H Kahoul; Riette J Britts; Maram H Sakkijha
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ulrike Holzinger; Joanna Warszawska; Reinhard Kitzberger; Marlene Wewalka; Wolfgang Miehsler; Harald Herkner; Christian Madl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  7 in total

1.  Dynamic properties of glucose complexity during the course of critical illness: a pilot study.

Authors:  Emmanuel Godat; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jean-Christophe Aude; Pierre Kalfon
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Cardiac ICU: Current Use and Future Directions.

Authors:  Laura A Scrimgeour; Brittany A Potz; Frank W Sellke; M Ruhul Abid
Journal:  Clin Med Res (N Y)       Date:  2017-11-24

3.  Evaluating perioperative glycemic status after different types of pancreatic surgeries via continuous glucose monitoring system: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yishen Mao; Xingfei Zhao; Lihui Zhou; Bin Lu; Chen Jin; Deliang Fu; Lie Yao; Ji Li
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-10

4.  Accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring device in critically ill patients.

Authors:  S Rijkenberg; S C van Steen; J H DeVries; P H J van der Voort
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Continuous Glucose Monitors and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Galindo; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; Ananda Basu; Suzanne Lohnes; James H Nichols; Elias K Spanakis; Juan Espinoza; Nadine E Palermo; Dessa Garnett Awadjie; Leigh Bak; Bruce Buckingham; Curtiss B Cook; Guido Freckmann; Lutz Heinemann; Roman Hovorka; Nestoras Mathioudakis; Tonya Newman; David N O'Neal; Michaela Rickert; David B Sacks; Jane Jeffrie Seley; Amisha Wallia; Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; Julia Han; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-28

Review 6.  The Clinical Benefits and Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients-A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sigrid C J van Steen; Saskia Rijkenberg; Jacqueline Limpens; Peter H J van der Voort; Jeroen Hermanides; J Hans DeVries
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Glucose Management during Insulinoma Resection Using Real-Time Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Yuki Sugiyama; Chiaki Kiuchi; Maiko Suzuki; Yuki Maruyama; Ryo Wakabayashi; Yasunari Ohno; Shugo Takahata; Takumi Shibazaki; Mikito Kawamata
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-06-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.