Celia F Hybels1, Carl F Pieper2, Dan G Blazer3, David C Steffens4. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3003, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research was to identify distinct trajectories of recovery in older depressed patients in order to identify optimal samples and points for interventions. METHODS: The sample was 368 patients ages 60 years and older diagnosed with major depression and enrolled in a naturalistic treatment study and followed for up to 3 years. RESULTS: A model with four trajectory classes fit the data best: a quick recovery class (43%), a persistent moderate symptom class (27%), a persistent high symptom class (15%), and a slow recovery class (15%). Compared with patients in the quick recovery class, patients in the persistent moderate symptom class had more instrumental activities of daily living/mobility limitations and lower levels of subjective social support. Patients in the persistent high symptom class had higher levels of perceived stress and lower levels of social support compared with those with a quick recovery. Patients in the slow recovery class had a younger age of onset compared with those in the quick recovery group. In multinomial logistic regression, levels of perceived stress and social support at baseline significantly differed across classes controlling for demographic and health variables. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients diagnosed with major depression can have varying patterns of response to treatment. Interventions targeting those patients with higher levels of perceived stress and lower levels of subjective social support at the time of the index episode may lead to more favorable long-term trajectories.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research was to identify distinct trajectories of recovery in older depressedpatients in order to identify optimal samples and points for interventions. METHODS: The sample was 368 patients ages 60 years and older diagnosed with major depression and enrolled in a naturalistic treatment study and followed for up to 3 years. RESULTS: A model with four trajectory classes fit the data best: a quick recovery class (43%), a persistent moderate symptom class (27%), a persistent high symptom class (15%), and a slow recovery class (15%). Compared with patients in the quick recovery class, patients in the persistent moderate symptom class had more instrumental activities of daily living/mobility limitations and lower levels of subjective social support. Patients in the persistent high symptom class had higher levels of perceived stress and lower levels of social support compared with those with a quick recovery. Patients in the slow recovery class had a younger age of onset compared with those in the quick recovery group. In multinomial logistic regression, levels of perceived stress and social support at baseline significantly differed across classes controlling for demographic and health variables. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients diagnosed with major depression can have varying patterns of response to treatment. Interventions targeting those patients with higher levels of perceived stress and lower levels of subjective social support at the time of the index episode may lead to more favorable long-term trajectories.
Authors: A S Henderson; A E Korten; P A Jacomb; A J Mackinnon; A F Jorm; H Christensen; B Rodgers Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Aartjan T F Beekman; Sandra W Geerlings; Dorly J H Deeg; Jan H Smit; Robert S Schoevers; Edwin de Beurs; Arjan W Braam; Brenda W J H Penninx; Willem van Tilburg Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2002-07
Authors: M Elizabeth Wilcox; Elizabeth A Freiheit; Peter Faris; David B Hogan; Scott B Patten; Todd Anderson; William A Ghali; Merril Knudtson; Andrew Demchuk; Colleen J Maxwell Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Endre Visted; Lin Sørensen; Jon Vøllestad; Berge Osnes; Julie Lillebostad Svendsen; Sebastian Jentschke; Per-Einar Binder; Elisabeth Schanche Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2019-10-18