Literature DB >> 26560543

Comparison of Six Automated Treponema-Specific Antibody Assays.

Borae G Park1, Jihoon G Yoon1, John Hoon Rim1, Anna Lee2, Hyon-Suk Kim3.   

Abstract

Six different Treponema (TP)-specific immunoassays were compared to the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) test. A total of 615 samples were tested. The overall percent agreement, analytical sensitivity, and analytical specificity of each assay compared to the FTA-ABS test were as follows: Architect Syphilis TP, 99.2%, 96.8%, and 100%; Cobas Syphilis, 99.8%, 99.4%, and 100%; ADVIA Centaur Syphilis, 99.8%, 99.4%, and 100%; HISCL Anti-TP assay kit, 99.7%, 98.7%, and 100%; Immunoticles Auto3 TP, 99.0%, 97.5%, and 99.6%; Mediace TPLA, 98.0%, 98.1%, and 98.0%. All results that were discrepant between the TP-specific assays were associated with samples from noninfectious cases (11 immunoassay false positives and 7 from previous syphilis cases). Our study demonstrated that TP-specific immunoassays generally showed high sensitivities, specificities, and percentages of agreement compared to FTA-ABS, with rare cases of false-positive or false-negative results. Therefore, most TP-specific immunoassays are acceptable for use in screening for syphilis. However, it is important to perform a thorough review of a patient's clinical and treatment history for interpreting the results of syphilis serology.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26560543      PMCID: PMC4702755          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02593-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

1.  IUSTI: 2008 European Guidelines on the Management of Syphilis.

Authors:  P French; M Gomberg; M Janier; B Schmidt; P van Voorst Vader; H Young
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.359

2.  Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Evaluation of new automated syphilis test reagents 'IMMUNOTICLES AUTO3' series: performance, biochemical reactivity, and clinical significance.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Yukimasa; Keisuke Miura; Yukiko Miyagawa; Kunihiko Fukuchi
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.211

Review 4.  Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis.

Authors:  Muhammad G Morshed; Ameeta E Singh
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2014-11-26

5.  Current trends in donor testing to detect syphilis infection.

Authors:  Karoll J Cortez; Melissa A Greenwald
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management.

Authors:  Man-Li Tong; Li-Rong Lin; Li-Li Liu; Hui-Lin Zhang; Song-Jie Huang; Yu-Yan Chen; Xiao-Jing Guo; Ya Xi; Long Liu; Fu-Yi Chen; Ya-Feng Zhang; Qiao Zhang; Tian-Ci Yang
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Treponema-specific tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of seven assays.

Authors:  M J Binnicker; D J Jespersen; L O Rollins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis?

Authors:  Matthew J Binnicker
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.915

9.  Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening--four laboratories, New York City, 2005-2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Characterization of sera with discordant results from reverse sequence screening for syphilis.

Authors:  Kyunghoon Lee; Hyewon Park; Eun Youn Roh; Sue Shin; Kyoung Un Park; Myoung Hee Park; Eun Young Song
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  An electrochemical scaffold sensor for rapid syphilis diagnosis.

Authors:  Nathan E Ogden; Martin Kurnik; Claudio Parolo; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.616

2.  Evaluation of Elecsys Syphilis Assay for Routine and Blood Screening and Detection of Early Infection.

Authors:  J Kremastinou; V Polymerou; D Lavranos; A Aranda Arrufat; J Harwood; M J Martínez Lorenzo; K P Ng; L Queiros; I Vereb; M Cusini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of Traditional and Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithms in Medical Health Checkups.

Authors:  Eun Hee Nah; Seon Cho; Suyoung Kim; Han Ik Cho; Jong Yil Chai
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons.

Authors:  Daniel A Ortiz; Mayur R Shukla; Michael J Loeffelholz
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Comparison of 17 serological treponemal and nontreponemal assays for syphilis: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Itsuko Sato; Yuji Nakamachi; Goh Ohji; Yoshihiko Yano; Jun Saegusa
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2022-09-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.