A comparison of RIFLE, AKIN, KDIGO, and Cys-C criteria for the definition of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients.

PURPOSE: AKI is a major clinical problem and predictor of prognosis in critically ill patients. The aim of our study was to determine whether the new Cys-C criteria for identification and prognosis of AKI were superior to the RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO criteria.
METHODS: In the retrospective and multicenter study, the incidence of AKI was identified by the four criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to compare the predictive ability for 28-day mortality, and logistic regression analysis was used for the calculation of odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals.
RESULTS: In the 1036 patients enrolled, the incidences of AKI were 26.4, 34.1, 37.8, and 36.1 %, respectively, under the four criteria. Patients with AKI had higher mortality and longer length of stay than those without in all definitions. Concordance in AKI diagnosis between Cys-C and KDIGO criteria was 95.9 %, higher than AKIN and RIFLE criteria (p < 0.0001). The area under ROC curves was 0.7023 for Cys-C criteria, which was a significantly greater discrimination (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: KDIGO criteria identified significantly more AKI and AKI patients had significantly higher 28-day mortality than patients without AKI. The Cys-C criteria were more predictive for short-term outcomes than other three criteria among critically ill patients.