Literature DB >> 26560408

Maternal healthcare in context: A qualitative study of women's tactics to improve their experience of public healthcare in rural Burkina Faso.

Lise Rosendal Østergaard1.   

Abstract

Improving the use of public maternal health facilities to prevent maternal death is a priority in developing countries. Accumulating evidence suggests that a key factor in choosing a facility-based delivery is the collaboration and the communication between healthcare providers and women. This article attempts to provide a fine-grained understanding of health system deficiencies, healthcare provider practices and women's experiences with maternal public healthcare. This article presents findings from ethnographic research conducted in the Central-East Region of Burkina Faso over a period of eight months (January-August 2013). It is based on monthly interviews with 14 women from village (10) and town (4) and on structured observations of clinical encounters in three primary healthcare facilities (two rural and one urban) (23 days). In addition, 13 health workers were interviewed and 11 focus groups with women from village (6) and town (5) were conducted (48 participants). Guided by an analytic focus on strategies and tactics and drawing on recent discussions on the notion of 'biomedical security', the article explores what tactics women employ in their efforts to maximize their chances of having a positive experience with public maternal healthcare. The synthesis of the cases shows that, in a context of poverty and social insecurity, women employ five tactics: establishing good relations with health workers, being mindful of their 'health booklet', attending prenatal care consultations, minimizing the waiting time at the maternity unit and using traditional medicines. In this way, women strive to achieve biomedical security for themselves and their child and to preserve their social reputation. The study reveals difficulty in the collaboration and communication between health workers and women and suggests that greater attention should be paid to social relations between healthcare providers and users.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burkina Faso; Ethnography; Maternal healthcare; Patient tactics; Primary healthcare; Qualitative methods; Trust

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26560408     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

1.  Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Soo Downe; Kenneth Finlayson; Özge Tunçalp; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-12

2.  "Children get sick all the time": A qualitative study of socio-cultural and health system factors contributing to recurrent child illnesses in rural Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Lise Rosendal Østergaard; Pia Juul Bjertrup; Helle Samuelsen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  A Qualitative Study to Explore the Barriers for Nonadherence to Referral to Hospital Births by Women with High-Risk Pregnancies in Nepal.

Authors:  Sushma Rajbanshi; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Women's decision-making power in a context of free reproductive healthcare and family planning in rural Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Camille Beaujoin; Alice Bila; Frank Bicaba; Véronique Plouffe; Abel Bicaba; Thomas Druetz
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Health professionals and patients' perspectives on person-centred maternal and child healthcare in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Thècle Twungubumwe; Mylène Tantchou Dipankui; Landry Traoré; Johanne Ouédraogo; Seydou Barro; Josette Castel; Isabelle Savard; Marlyse Mbakop Nguebou; Jean Ramdé; André Côté; Judith Lapierre; Ruth Ndjaboue; Maman Joyce Dogba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.