Literature DB >> 26559951

Phenotypic divergence during speciation is inversely associated with differences in seasonal migration.

Kira E Delmore1, Haley L Kenyon2, Ryan R Germain3, Darren E Irwin2.   

Abstract

Differences in seasonal migration might promote reproductive isolation and differentiation by causing populations in migratory divides to arrive on the breeding grounds at different times and/or produce hybrids that take inferior migratory routes. We examined this question by quantifying divergence in song, colour, and morphology between sister pairs of North American migratory birds. We predicted that apparent rates of phenotypic differentiation would differ between pairs that do and do not form migratory divides. Consistent with this prediction, results from mixed effects models and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models of evolution showed different rates of divergence between these groups; surprisingly, differentiation was greater among non-divide pairs. We interpret this finding as a result of variable rates of population blending and fusion between partially diverged forms. Ancient pairs of populations that subsequently fused are now observed as a single form, whereas those that did not fuse are observable as pairs and included in our study. We propose that fusion of two populations is more likely to occur when they have similar migratory routes and little other phenotypic differentiation that would cause reproductive isolation. By contrast, pairs with migratory divides are more likely to remain reproductively isolated, even when differing little in other phenotypic traits. These findings suggest that migratory differences may be one among several isolating barriers that prevent divergent populations from fusing and thereby increase the likelihood that they will continue differentiating as distinct species.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Keywords:  comparative analysis; evolutionary rate; migratory divide; phenotypic divergence; seasonal migration; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26559951      PMCID: PMC4685813          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  38 in total

1.  Random interbreeding between cryptic lineages of the Common Raven: evidence for speciation in reverse.

Authors:  William C Webb; John M Marzluff; Kevin E Omland
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  The evolution of F1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds.

Authors:  Trevor D Price; Michelle M Bouvier
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  A comprehensive multilocus phylogeny for the wood-warblers and a revised classification of the Parulidae (Aves).

Authors:  Irby J Lovette; Jorge L Pérez-Emán; John P Sullivan; Richard C Banks; Isabella Fiorentino; Sergio Córdoba-Córdoba; María Echeverry-Galvis; F Keith Barker; Kevin J Burns; John Klicka; Scott M Lanyon; Eldredge Bermingham
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  A latitudinal gradient in rates of evolution of avian syllable diversity and song length.

Authors:  Jason T Weir; David Wheatcroft
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Glacial cycles and the tempo of avian speciation.

Authors:  Irby J Lovette
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Hybridization of bird species.

Authors:  P R Grant; B R Grant
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Contemporary evolution of reproductive isolation and phenotypic divergence in sympatry along a migratory divide.

Authors:  Gregor Rolshausen; Gernot Segelbacher; Keith A Hobson; H Martin Schaefer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Whole-genome sequencing of giant pandas provides insights into demographic history and local adaptation.

Authors:  Shancen Zhao; Pingping Zheng; Shanshan Dong; Xiangjiang Zhan; Qi Wu; Xiaosen Guo; Yibo Hu; Weiming He; Shanning Zhang; Wei Fan; Lifeng Zhu; Dong Li; Xuemei Zhang; Quan Chen; Hemin Zhang; Zhihe Zhang; Xuelin Jin; Jinguo Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Jun Wang; Fuwen Wei
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Flycatcher song in allopatry and sympatry--convergence, divergence and reinforcement.

Authors:  J Haavie; T Borge; S Bures; L Z Garamszegi; H M Lampe; J Moreno; A Qvarnström; J Török; G-P Saetre
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Contrasting evolutionary dynamics and information content of the avian mitochondrial control region and ND2 gene.

Authors:  F Keith Barker; Mariah K Benesh; Arion J Vandergon; Scott M Lanyon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Candidate genes for migration do not distinguish migratory and non-migratory birds.

Authors:  Juan S Lugo Ramos; Kira E Delmore; Miriam Liedvogel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Seasonal migration patterns and the maintenance of evolutionary diversity in a cryptic bird radiation.

Authors:  Qindong Tang; Reto Burri; Yang Liu; Alexander Suh; Gombobaatar Sundev; Gerald Heckel; Manuel Schweizer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 6.622

3.  Integration of Genetic and Phenotypic Data in 48 Lineages of Philippine Birds Shows Heterogeneous Divergence Processes and Numerous Cryptic Species.

Authors:  Kyle K Campbell; Thomas Braile; Kevin Winker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.