Literature DB >> 26559707

Snacking, Satiety, and Weight: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Valentine Yanchou Njike1, Yasemin Kavak1, Judith A Treu1, Kimberly Doughty2, David L Katz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of nut-based snack bars (NBSB) vs. prepackaged 200-kcal portions of typical conventional snack foods, when consumed over a 12-week period by a group of overweight adults.
DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind parallel design with two treatment groups.
SUBJECTS: Thirty-four overweight participants were enrolled. INTERVENTION: Commercially available NBSB or conventional snack foods as part of an ad libitum diet for 12 weeks. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: body mass index, body weight, body composition, waist circumference. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: blood pressure, lipid profile, nutrients intake, hunger/satiety, quality of life. ANALYSIS: Generalized linear models with time as repeated measure were used to analyze these data.
RESULTS: Daily consumption of NBSB for 12 weeks, as compared to daily consumption of conventional snacks, significantly reduced percentage body fat (-1.7% ± 10.8% vs. 6.2% ± 9.3%; p = .04) and visceral fat (-1.3 ± 5.9 vs. 2.7 ± 4.0; p = .03). There were no between-group differences (p > .05) for blood pressure, lipid panel, satiety, or quality of life measures.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that daily consumption of NBSB for 12 weeks reduced body fat and had no adverse effects on weight, blood pressure, lipid profile, satiety, or quality of life in this small sample of overweight adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health focus: hunger/satiety, nutrition, quality of life; Outcome measure: body mass index, body weight, body composition, waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profile, nutrients intake, hunger/satiety, quality of life; Research purpose: intervention testing; Setting: clinical; Snacking, Satiety, Overweight, Prevention Research. Manuscript format: research; Strategy: education, incentive; Study design: randomized, single-blind parallel trial; Target population age: overweight adults; Target population circumstances: geographic location

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26559707     DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.150120-QUAN-676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  4 in total

Review 1.  Are fatty nuts a weighty concern? A systematic review and meta-analysis and dose-response meta-regression of prospective cohorts and randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Stephanie K Nishi; Effie Viguiliouk; Sonia Blanco Mejia; Cyril W C Kendall; Richard P Bazinet; Anthony J Hanley; Elena M Comelli; Jordi Salas Salvadó; David J A Jenkins; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 10.867

2.  Effects of indulgent food snacking, with and without exercise training, on body weight, fat mass, and cardiometabolic risk markers in overweight and obese men.

Authors:  Wesley J Tucker; Catherine L Jarrett; Andrew C D'Lugos; Siddhartha S Angadi; Glenn A Gaesser
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-11

Review 3.  The Relationship of Tree Nuts and Peanuts with Adiposity Parameters: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rubén Fernández-Rodríguez; Arthur E Mesas; Miriam Garrido-Miguel; Isabel A Martínez-Ortega; Estela Jiménez-López; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Changes in body weight in response to pecan-enriched diets with and without substitution instructions: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Liana L Guarneiri; Chad M Paton; Jamie A Cooper
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2022-03-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.