| Literature DB >> 26559636 |
Margarita C G Correa1,2, Eric Lombaert2, Thibaut Malausa2, Didier Crochard2, Andrés Alvear3, Tania Zaviezo1, Ferran Palero2.
Abstract
The present study aimed to characterize the distribution of mealybug species along Chilean agro-ecosystems and to determine the relative impact of host plant, management strategy, geography and micro-environment on shaping the distribution and genetic structure of the obscure mealybug Pseudococcus viburni. An extensive survey was completed using DNA barcoding methods to identify Chilean mealybugs to the species level. Moreover, a fine-scale study of Ps. viburni genetic diversity and population structure was carried out, genotyping 529 Ps. viburni individuals with 21 microsatellite markers. Samples from 16 localities were analyzed using Bayesian and spatially-explicit methods and the genetic dataset was confronted to host-plant, management and environmental data. Chilean crops were found to be infested by Ps. viburni, Pseudococcus meridionalis, Pseudococcus longispinus and Planococcus citri, with Ps. viburni and Ps. meridionalis showing contrasting distribution and host-plant preference patterns. Ps. viburni samples presented low genetic diversity levels but high genetic differentiation. While no significant genetic variance could be assigned to host-plant or management strategy, climate and geography were found to correlate significantly with genetic differentiation levels. The genetic characterization of Ps. viburni within Chile will contribute to future studies tracing back the origin and improving the management of this worldwide invader.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26559636 PMCID: PMC4642311 DOI: 10.1038/srep16483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Mealybug populations sampled along Chile and molecular identification using the 28S gene region.
| Pop | Locality | Region | Host | Collector | Species identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT1 | Copiapó | Atacama | Grape | M. Correa | |
| AT2 | Copiapó | Atacama | Grape | M. Correa | |
| AT3 | Copiapó | Atacama | Grape | M. Correa | |
| CQ1 | Vicuña | Coquimbo | Grape | M. Correa | |
| VL1 | San Felipe | Valparaíso | Grape | M. Correa | |
| VL2 | Los Andes | Valparaíso | Grape | M. Correa | |
| VL3 | Casablanca | Valparaíso | Grape | A. Galaz/L. Segovia | |
| VL4 | Casablanca | Valparaíso | Grape | A. Galaz/L. Segovia | |
| MT1 | Pudahuel | Metropolitana | Grape | A. Galaz/L. Segovia | |
| MT2 | Paine | Metropolitana | Plum | A. Galaz/L. Segovia | |
| MT3 | Pirque | Metropolitana | Grape | M. Correa | |
| MT4 | Los Morros | Metropolitana | Grape | A. Galaz/L. Segovia | |
| MT5 | Linderos | Metropolitana | Grape | A. Galaz/L. Segovia | |
| MT6 | María Pinto | Metropolitana | Orange | M. Correa | |
| OH1 | Placilla | O’Higgins | Apple | A. Romero | |
| OH2 | Nancagua | O’Higgins | Grape | M. Correa | |
| OH3 | Nancagua | O’Higgins | Grape | M. Correa | |
| OH4 | Chimbarongo | O’Higgins | Grape | M. Correa | |
| OH5 | Chépica | O’Higgins | Grape | M. Correa | |
| OH6 | Peumo | O’Higgins | Pear | K. Buzzetti | |
| OH7 | Peumo | O’Higgins | Grape | K. Buzzetti | |
| OH8 | Peumo | O’Higgins | Grape | K. Buzzetti | |
| OH9 | Peumo | O’Higgins | Apple | K. Buzzetti | |
| OH10 | Las Cabras | O’Higgins | Grape | K. Buzzetti | |
| OH11 | Doñihue | O’Higgins | Apple | K. Buzzetti | |
| OH12 | Pichidegua | O’Higgins | Orange | M. Correa | |
| OH13 | Las Cabras | O’Higgins | Orange | M. Correa | |
| ML1 | Molina | Maule | Apple | M. Correa | |
| ML2 | Molina | Maule | Grape | M. Correa | |
| ML3 | Molina | Maule | Pear | M. Correa | |
| ML4 | Molina | Maule | Apple | K. Buzzetti | |
| ML5 | Molina | Maule | Apple | K. Buzzetti | |
| ML6 | Molina | Maule | Apple | K. Buzzetti | |
| BB1 | Angol | Bio Bio | Apple | K. Buzzetti | |
| BB2 | Angol | Bio Bio | Apple | K. Buzzetti | |
| BB3 | Angol | Bio Bio | Apple | K. Buzzetti | |
| BB4 | Angol | Bio Bio | Apple | K. Buzzetti | |
| BB5 | Angol | Bio Bio | Apple | K. Buzzetti |
Figure 1Spatial distribution of mealybug species found in Chilean valleys.
Sampling localities are indicated using different shapes depending on the species found. Limits between administrative regions are drawn as black lines and valleys are highlighted using different colors. Figure created using the software CorelDRAW X6.
Genetic diversity and categorical data of Pseudococcus viburni samples. Microsatellite data: mean number of alleles (Na), allelic richness (Â) for n=20 genotypes, observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity with standard deviation (s.d.), and inbreeding coefficients (FIS).
| Pop | Locality | Region | Host | Management Strategy | Microsatellite Data | FIS | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Na | Â | Ho | s.d | He | s.d | ||||||||
| AT1 | Copiapó | Atacama | Grape | Traditional | 28 | 2.33 | 2.2 | 0.270 | ± | 0.324 | 0.255 | ± | 0.263 | 0,101 |
| CQ1 | Vicuña | Coquimbo | Grape | Traditional | 29 | 2.71 | 2.64 | 0.331 | ± | 0.264 | 0.342 | ± | 0.256 | 0,038 |
| VL1 | San Felipe | Valparaíso | Grape | Traditional | 32 | 3.38 | 3.19 | 0.330 | ± | 0.217 | 0.380 | ± | 0.253 | 0,100 |
| VL2 | Los Andes | Valparaíso | Grape | Traditional | 30 | 3.52 | 3.18 | 0.397 | ± | 0.248 | 0.414 | ± | 0.243 | 0,049 |
| VL3 | Casablanca | Valparaíso | Grape | Organic | 33 | 3.62 | 3.43 | 0.435 | ± | 0.238 | 0.438 | ± | 0.218 | −0,001 |
| VL4 | Casablanca | Valparaíso | Grape | Organic | 32 | 3.38 | 3.33 | 0.355 | ± | 0.251 | 0.390 | ± | 0.234 | 0,094 |
| MT1 | Pudahuel | Metropolitana | Grape | Organic | 27 | 3.48 | 3.50 | 0.390 | ± | 0.231 | 0.424 | ± | 0.227 | 0,088 |
| MT2 | Paine | Metropolitana | Plum | Organic | 43 | 3.19 | 3.52 | 0.373 | ± | 0.261 | 0.410 | ± | 0.215 | 0,110 |
| OH1 | Placilla | O’Higgins | Apple | Organic | 22 | 2.91 | 2.90 | 0.395 | ± | 0.273 | 0.391 | ± | 0.234 | 0,041 |
| OH2 | Nancagua | O’Higgins | Grape | Organic | 37 | 2.62 | 2.28 | 0.331 | ± | 0.251 | 0.311 | ± | 0.232 | −0,048 |
| OH3 | Nancagua | O’Higgins | Grape | Organic | 45 | 3.14 | 3.15 | 0.367 | ± | 0.210 | 0.410 | ± | 0.208 | 0,097 |
| OH4 | Chimbarongo | O’Higgins | Grape | Organic | 36 | 3.38 | 3.17 | 0.379 | ± | 0.212 | 0.426 | ± | 0.235 | 0,110 |
| OH5 | Chépica | O’Higgins | Grape | Traditional | 30 | 2.95 | 2.84 | 0.324 | ± | 0.196 | 0.369 | ± | 0.198 | 0,133 |
| ML1 | Molina | Maule | Apple | Organic | 35 | 2.29 | 2.23 | 0.295 | ± | 0.229 | 0.295 | ± | 0.218 | 0,027 |
| ML2 | Molina | Maule | Grape | Traditional | 49 | 3.43 | 2.96 | 0.344 | ± | 0.223 | 0.363 | ± | 0.221 | 0,066 |
| ML3 | Molina | Maule | Pear | Traditional | 21 | 2.57 | 2.96 | 0.323 | ± | 0.229 | 0.327 | ± | 0.220 | 0,022 |
Pairwise FST (lower matrix) and DST values (upper matrix) observed between Pseudococcus viburni samples from Chile. All Fisher’s exact tests for population differentiation were significant at the 0.05 threshold.
| AT1 | CQ1 | VL1 | VL2 | VL3 | VL4 | MT1 | MT2 | OH1 | OH2 | OH3 | OH4 | OH5 | ML1 | ML2 | ML3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT1 | – | 0.1243 | 0.2218 | 0.2143 | 0.2032 | 0.1902 | 0.2175 | 0.2237 | 0.2249 | 0.2271 | 0.2046 | 0.2096 | 0.1727 | 0.2244 | 0.2541 | 0.2423 |
| CQ1 | 0.1701 | – | 0.1908 | 0.2060 | 0.1497 | 0.1664 | 0.1589 | 0.1509 | 0.1833 | 0.2262 | 0.1845 | 0.1920 | 0.1490 | 0.2274 | 0.2229 | 0.2426 |
| VL1 | 0.2682 | 0.2212 | – | 0.0350 | 0.1041 | 0.1033 | 0.0761 | 0.0980 | 0.0541 | 0.0671 | 0.0369 | 0.0585 | 0.0490 | 0.0812 | 0.0610 | 0.0612 |
| VL2 | 0.2959 | 0.2225 | 0.0314 | – | 0.1031 | 0.1035 | 0.0893 | 0.1061 | 0.0925 | 0.0891 | 0.0620 | 0.0812 | 0.0754 | 0.0906 | 0.0926 | 0.0846 |
| VL3 | 0.2534 | 0.1734 | 0.0773 | 0.0522 | – | 0.0344 | 0.1119 | 0.0885 | 0.1369 | 0.1614 | 0.1085 | 0.0718 | 0.0795 | 0.1308 | 0.0800 | 0.0909 |
| VL4 | 0.3408 | 0.2642 | 0.0959 | 0.0702 | 0.0742 | – | 0.1147 | 0.0732 | 0.1364 | 0.1490 | 0.1021 | 0.0709 | 0.0800 | 0.1126 | 0.0821 | 0.0880 |
| MT1 | 0.2337 | 0.1493 | 0.0920 | 0.0956 | 0.0798 | 0.0767 | – | 0.0609 | 0.0814 | 0.1391 | 0.0717 | 0.0763 | 0.0852 | 0.1360 | 0.1115 | 0.1033 |
| MT2 | 0.2335 | 0.1622 | 0.0937 | 0.0946 | 0.0803 | 0.0801 | 0.0303 | – | 0.0729 | 0.1266 | 0.0646 | 0.0628 | 0.0792 | 0.0958 | 0.0875 | 0.0805 |
| OH1 | 0.2660 | 0.1822 | 0.0820 | 0.0767 | 0.0822 | 0.1087 | 0.1012 | 0.1017 | – | 0.0745 | 0.0248 | 0.0457 | 0.0677 | 0.0841 | 0.1003 | 0.0979 |
| OH2 | 0.3402 | 0.2878 | 0.1094 | 0.0928 | 0.1231 | 0.1331 | 0.1651 | 0.1599 | 0.1555 | – | 0.0521 | 0.0761 | 0.0912 | 0.0795 | 0.0974 | 0.0859 |
| OH3 | 0.2723 | 0.2081 | 0.0649 | 0.0437 | 0.0383 | 0.0806 | 0.0975 | 0.0900 | 0.0721 | 0.0727 | – | 0.0348 | 0.0347 | 0.0428 | 0.0688 | 0.0554 |
| OH4 | 0.2582 | 0.1991 | 0.0700 | 0.0569 | 0.0485 | 0.0323 | 0.0596 | 0.0593 | 0.0719 | 0.0861 | 0.0392 | – | 0.0453 | 0.0575 | 0.0372 | 0.0409 |
| OH5 | 0.2952 | 0.1950 | 0.1052 | 0.1018 | 0.0898 | 0.0942 | 0.0858 | 0.0639 | 0.0641 | 0.1562 | 0.0642 | 0.0580 | – | 0.0589 | 0.0584 | 0.0552 |
| ML1 | 0.3077 | 0.2214 | 0.1018 | 0.0695 | 0.0778 | 0.1147 | 0.1327 | 0.1375 | 0.0868 | 0.0976 | 0.0334 | 0.0454 | 0.0775 | – | 0.0457 | 0.0371 |
| ML2 | 0.3516 | 0.2928 | 0.1120 | 0.1076 | 0.0917 | 0.0719 | 0.1433 | 0.1223 | 0.1448 | 0.1325 | 0.0587 | 0.0697 | 0.1073 | 0.1142 | – | 0.0142 |
| ML3 | 0.3538 | 0.2838 | 0.0778 | 0.0597 | 0.0606 | 0.0018 | 0.0720 | 0.0748 | 0.0948 | 0.1118 | 0.0541 | 0.0227 | 0.0936 | 0.1092 | 0.0519 | – |
Figure 2Genetic clustering of Ps. viburni populations from Chile.
Results obtained using (A) Distance-based neighbor-joining tree, with node support obtained using 1,000 bootstrap replicates over loci (cut-off value >65); (B) Bayesian clustering method implemented in STRUCTURE; (C) Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC). Populations have been color-coded in figures 2A and 2C following the clusters obtained from STRUCTURE.
Figure 3Spatial genetic structure of Ps. viburni populations from Chile.
(A) Different connectivity networks tested; (B) The two main global components of the sPCA analysis, showing that the populations from the Valparaiso (VL3-VL4) and Metropolitana (MT1-MT2) regions have larger negative scores (white squares) than locations on the other clusters; (C) Plot of the two components with the largest negative values, showing that local changes are significant in the northern samples and within the O’Higgins area (both white and black squares present within clusters). Figure created using the software CorelDRAW X6.
Global Analyses of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) as a weighted average over loci carried out to compare the effect of categorical factors on the genetic structure of Pseudococcus viburni.
| Source of Variation | df | SS | Variance components | % variation | F statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative Regions | Among groups | 5 | 350.639 | 0.305 | 7.37 | FCT = 0.074 |
| Among populations within groups | 10 | 210.896 | 0.263 | 6.36 | FSC = 0.069 | |
| Within populations | 1042 | 3717.699 | 3.568 | 86.28 | ||
| Management Strategy | Among groups | 1 | 38.407 | −0.002 | −0.06 | F |
| Among populations within groups | 14 | 523.128 | 0.515 | 12.63 | ||
| Within populations | 1042 | 3717.699 | 3.568 | 87.43 | ||
| Host Plant | Among groups | 3 | 75.003 | −0.058 | −1.44 | F |
| Among populations within groups | 12 | 486.531 | 0.535 | 13.23 | ||
| Within populations | 1042 | 3717.699 | 3.568 | 88.21 |
Significant results (p < 0.05) after 20,000 permutations are indicated in bold.