Literature DB >> 26559537

Morbidity and mortality revue of the French group of transoral robotic surgery: a multicentric study.

K Aubry1, S Vergez2, E de Mones3, S Moriniere4, O Choussy5, O Malard6, G Dolivet7, B Lallemant8, P Ceruse9.   

Abstract

Transoral robotic assisted surgery (TORS) represents an innovative endoscopic therapeutic alternative in the treatment of head and neck tumors. Many publications favor this surgery, especially in terms of functional results. The aim of this study was to investigate the TORS morbidity and mortality and to identify the risk factors for complications. It is a multicenter retrospective study. All head and neck tumor patients treated by TORS were included in the study over a period of 5 years (2009-2014). The studied parameters were the intraoperative and post-operative complications including hemorrhage, fistula, tracheotomy, aspiration pneumonia and death. The parameters were correlated with age, tumor location, tumor stage, endoscopic exposure and patient's co-morbidities. 178 patients were included in the study. Malignant tumors classified as T1 were found in 169 cases (n = 51), T2 (n = 100), T3 (n = 16) and T4 (n = 2). The tumor locations were distributed as follows: larynx (n = 84), oropharynx (n = 51), and hypopharynx (n = 43). Fifty-three patients followed post-radiation therapy. We observed 12 intraoperative complications including 6 hemorrhage, 3 pharyngeal fistulas and 3 external surgical conversions. Postoperatively, we detected 33 hemorrhage, 27 aspiration pneumonia, 9 tracheostomy, 2 pharyngostomes, 2 cervical spondylitis and 2 deaths. The risk factors identified were (i) anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy for hemorrhage, (ii) tumoral stage and the laryngeal location for aspiration pneumonia and (iii) laryngeal location for tracheostomy. Higher age over 65 years has been identified as a risk factor for all post-operative complications. TORS is a safe technique for the treatment of head and neck tumors. We identified some risk factors for complications which should systematically be studied in order to reduce its morbidity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancers; Morbidity; Mortality; Transoral robotic surgery; da Vinci robot

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26559537     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-015-0542-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  16 in total

1.  Transoral robotic surgery of the vocal cord.

Authors:  Ray Gervacio F Blanco; Patrick K Ha; Joseph A Califano; John M Saunders
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Concurrent neck dissection and transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  Eric J Moore; Kerry D Olsen; Eliot J Martin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Feasiblity of transoral robotic hypopharyngectomy for early-stage hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Young Min Park; Won Shik Kim; Hyung Kwon Byeon; Armando De Virgilio; Jin Sei Jung; Se-Heon Kim
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Pyogenic spondylodiscitis after transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Keigo Honda; Ryo Asato; Jun Tsuji; Tomoko Kanda; Yoshiki Watanabe; Yusuke Mori; Takashi Tsujimura
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 1.863

Review 5.  A shifting paradigm for patients with head and neck cancer: transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

Authors:  Mihir K Bhayani; F Christopher Holsinger; Stephen Y Lai
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  Hemorrhage after transoral robotic-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Scott A Asher; Hilliary N White; Alexandra E Kejner; Eben L Rosenthal; William R Carroll; J Scott Magnuson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Reconstructive techniques in transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer: a North American survey.

Authors:  Petros Konofaos; Sarah Hammond; Jon P Ver Halen; Sandeep Samant
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Learning curve for transoral robotic surgery: a 4-year analysis.

Authors:  Hilliary N White; John Frederick; Terence Zimmerman; William R Carroll; J Scott Magnuson
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Young Min Park; Woo Jung Lee; Jeong Gwon Lee; Won Sang Lee; Eun Chang Choi; Sa Myung Chung; Se-Heon Kim
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.878

10.  Osteomyelitis of the cervical spine following laryngectomy.

Authors:  S R Ell; A J Parker; D Limb; R T Clegg
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.469

View more
  12 in total

1.  Evaluating the risks and benefits of ketorolac in transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  Morgan M Sandelski; Sarah M Drejet; David Zimmer; Jessica A Yesensky; Michael Moore; Avinash V Mantravadi; Michael W Sim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-16

2.  Postoperative hemorrhage and hospital revisit after transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  Joseph Zenga; Jasmina Suko; Dorina Kallogjeri; Patrik Pipkorn; Brian Nussenbaum; Ryan S Jackson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Early assessment of feasibility and technical specificities of transoral robotic surgery using the da Vinci Xi.

Authors:  Philippe Gorphe; Jean Von Tan; Sophie El Bedoui; Dana M Hartl; Anne Auperin; Quentin Qassemyar; Antoine Moya-Plana; François Janot; Morbize Julieron; Stephane Temam
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-01-07

4.  Transoral robotic surgery for squamous cell carcinomas of the posterior pharyngeal wall.

Authors:  B Lallemant; S Moriniere; P Ceruse; M Lebalch; K Aubry; S Hans; G Dolivet; O Malard; Q Bonduelle; S Vergez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  A prospective evaluation of short-term dysphagia after transoral robotic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.

Authors:  William G Albergotti; Jessica Jordan; Keely Anthony; Shira Abberbock; Tamara Wasserman-Wincko; Seungwon Kim; Robert L Ferris; Umamaheswar Duvvuri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Complications following transoral robotic surgery (TORS): A detailed institutional review of complications.

Authors:  Ashley Hay; Jocelyn Migliacci; Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Jay O Boyle; Bhuvanesh Singh; Richard J Wong; Snehal G Patel; Ian Ganly
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.337

7.  Transoral robotic surgery vs open surgery in head and neck cancer. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  À Roselló; R Albuquerque; X Roselló-Llabrés; A Marí-Roig; A Estrugo-Devesa; J López-López
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2020-09-01

8.  Haemorrhage following transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  A Hay; J Migliacci; D Karassawa Zanoni; J O Boyle; B Singh; R J Wong; S G Patel; I Ganly
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.597

9.  Airway management during transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancers: a French GETTEC group survey.

Authors:  Valentine Poissonnet; Emilien Chabrillac; Philippe Schultz; Sylvain Morinière; Philippe Gorphe; Bertrand Baujat; Renaud Garrel; Audrey Lasne-Cardon; Alexandre Villeneuve; Guillaume Chambon; Nicolas Fakhry; Karine Aubry; Xavier Dufour; Olivier Malard; Romina Mastronicola; Benjamin Vairel; Patrice Gallet; Philippe Ceruse; Franck Jegoux; Jean Ton Van; Guillaume De Bonnecaze; Sébastien Vergez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Functional Organ Preservation Surgery in Head and Neck Cancer: Transoral Robotic Surgery and Beyond.

Authors:  Wojciech Golusiński
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.