Literature DB >> 26559480

Immunofluorescence Tomography of Mouse Ocular Surface Epithelial Stem Cells and Their Niche Microenvironment.

Geraint J Parfitt, Behdad Kavianpour, Karen L Wu, Yilu Xie, Donald J Brown, James V Jester.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Currently, there are no definitive immunomarkers for epithelial stem cells (corneal and conjunctival) or their poorly understood niche microenvironment. The H2B-GFP/K5tTA mouse enables visualization of label-retaining cells (LRCs), which exhibit the functional marker of stem cell quiescence. We used immunofluorescence tomography to evaluate putative stem cell markers and LRCs of the mouse ocular surface.
METHODS: H2B-GFP/K5tTA mice were pulsed for 56 days and then chased with doxycycline to label LRCs. Limbus and eyelid tissue was 3-dimensionally (3-D) reconstructed using immunofluorescence tomography to identify and characterize LRCs using the putative stem cell markers sox9, keratin 19, lrig1, blimp1, and abcb5.
RESULTS: After 28 days of chase, LRCs were localized to the entire limbus epithelium and, infrequently, the anterior limbal stroma. Label-retaining cells comprised 3% of limbal epithelial cells after 56 days of chase. Conjunctival LRCs were localized to the fornix and comprised 4% of the total fornix epithelial cells. No stem cell immunomarker was specific for ocular surface LRCs; however, blimp1 enriched for limbal basal epithelial cells and 100% of green fluorescent protein-positive (GFP+) cells at the limbus and fornix were found to be lrig1-positive.
CONCLUSIONS: Label-retaining cells represent a larger population of the mouse limbus than previously thought. They decrease in number with increased doxycycline chase, suggesting that LRC populations with different cell cycle lengths exist at the limbus. We conclude that current immunomarkers are unable to colocalize with the functional marker of epithelial stem cell quiescence; however, blimp1 may enrich for limbal epithelial basal cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26559480      PMCID: PMC4642609          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  37 in total

1.  Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin.

Authors:  Tudorita Tumbar; Geraldine Guasch; Valentina Greco; Cedric Blanpain; William E Lowry; Michael Rendl; Elaine Fuchs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Intrastromal invasion by limbal epithelial cells is mediated by epithelial-mesenchymal transition activated by air exposure.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kawakita; Edgar M Espana; Hua He; Wei Li; Chia-Yiang Liu; Scheffer C G Tseng
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  P63 expression levels in side population and low light scattering ocular surface epithelial cells.

Authors:  Seth P Epstein; J Mario Wolosin; Penny A Asbell
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

4.  Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells.

Authors:  G Cotsarelis; S Z Cheng; G Dong; T T Sun; R M Lavker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-04-21       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Ferreting out stem cells from their niches.

Authors:  Elaine Fuchs; Valerie Horsley
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 6.  Stem cells of the skin epithelium.

Authors:  Laura Alonso; Elaine Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rabbit conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells belong to two separate lineages.

Authors:  Z G Wei; T T Sun; R M Lavker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells.

Authors:  A Schermer; S Galvin; T T Sun
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Location and clonal analysis of stem cells and their differentiated progeny in the human ocular surface.

Authors:  G Pellegrini; O Golisano; P Paterna; A Lambiase; S Bonini; P Rama; M De Luca
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-05-17       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Absence of ductal hyper-keratinization in mouse age-related meibomian gland dysfunction (ARMGD).

Authors:  Geraint J Parfitt; Yilu Xie; Mikhail Geyfman; Donald J Brown; James V Jester
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.682

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for reconstructing the limbal stem cell niche.

Authors:  Ghasem Yazdanpanah; Zeeshan Haq; Kai Kang; Sayena Jabbehdari; Mark L Rosenblatt; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  The Blimp-1 transcription factor acts in non-neuronal cells to regulate terminal differentiation of the Drosophila eye.

Authors:  Hongsu Wang; Carolyn A Morrison; Neha Ghosh; Joy S Tea; Gerald B Call; Jessica E Treisman
Journal:  Development       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.862

Review 3.  Limbal stem cells: identity, developmental origin, and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Gabriel Gonzalez; Yuzuru Sasamoto; Bruce R Ksander; Markus H Frank; Natasha Y Frank
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 5.814

4.  Two-photon live imaging of single corneal stem cells reveals compartmentalized organization of the limbal niche.

Authors:  Olivia Farrelly; Yoko Suzuki-Horiuchi; Megan Brewster; Paola Kuri; Sixia Huang; Gabriella Rice; Hyunjin Bae; Jianming Xu; Tzvete Dentchev; Vivian Lee; Panteleimon Rompolas
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 25.269

5.  FACS-sorted putative oogonial stem cells from the ovary are neither DDX4-positive nor germ cells.

Authors:  Larissa Zarate-Garcia; Simon I R Lane; Julie A Merriman; Keith T Jones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Artificial Polymeric Scaffolds as Extracellular Matrix Substitutes for Autologous Conjunctival Goblet Cell Expansion.

Authors:  Min He; Thomas Storr-Paulsen; Annie L Wang; Chiara E Ghezzi; Siran Wang; Matthew Fullana; Dimitrios Karamichos; Tor P Utheim; Rakibul Islam; May Griffith; M Mirazul Islam; Robin R Hodges; Gary E Wnek; David L Kaplan; Darlene A Dartt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Characterization of slow cycling corneal limbal epithelial cells identifies putative stem cell markers.

Authors:  R Sartaj; C Zhang; P Wan; Z Pasha; V Guaiquil; A Liu; J Liu; Y Luo; E Fuchs; M I Rosenblatt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Transcription factor profiling identifies Sox9 as regulator of proliferation and differentiation in corneal epithelial stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Johannes Menzel-Severing; Matthias Zenkel; Naresh Polisetti; Elisabeth Sock; Michael Wegner; Friedrich E Kruse; Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Role of Human Corneal Stroma-Derived Mesenchymal-Like Stem Cells in Corneal Immunity and Wound Healing.

Authors:  Zoltán Veréb; Szilárd Póliska; Réka Albert; Ole Kristoffer Olstad; Anita Boratkó; Csilla Csortos; Morten C Moe; Andrea Facskó; Goran Petrovski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Origin and Lineage Plasticity of Endogenous Lacrimal Gland Epithelial Stem/Progenitor Cells.

Authors:  Liana Basova; Geraint J Parfitt; Alex Richardson; Vanessa Delcroix; Takeshi Umazume; Daniel Pelaez; David T Tse; Ivo Kalajzic; Nick Di Girolamo; James V Jester; Helen P Makarenkova
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.