Literature DB >> 26558830

INR variability and outcomes in patients with mechanical heart valve prosthesis.

Ashkan Labaf1, Anders Själander2, Martin Stagmo3, Peter J Svensson4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The quality of treatment with warfarin is mainly assessed by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) in patients with mechanical heart valve prosthesis (MHV). Our aim was to evaluate if International Normalized Ratio (INR) variability predicted a combined endpoint of thromboembolism, major bleeding and death better than TTR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We included 394 patients at one center with MHV during 2008-2011 with adverse events and death followed prospectively. TTR 2.0-4.0 and log-transformed INR variability was calculated for all patients. In order to make comparisons between the measures, the gradient of the risk per one standard deviation (SD) was assessed. INR variability performed equal as TTR 2.0-4.0 per one SD unit adjusted for covariates, hazard ratio (HR) 1.30 (95% CI 1.1-1.5) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.6-0.8) respectively for the combined endpoint, and performed better for mortality HR 1.47 (95% CI 1.1-1.9) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.6-0.8). INR variability was categorized into high and low group and TTR into tertiles. High variability within the low and high TTR, had a HR 2.0 (95% CI 1.7-3.6) and 2.2 (95% CI 1.1-4.1) respectively, of the combined endpoint compared to the low variability/high TTR group. INR values <2.0 greatly increased the rate of thromboembolism whereas the rate of major bleeding increased moderately between INR 3.0 and 4.0 and increased substantially after INR >4.0.
CONCLUSION: The INR variability is an equal predictor as TTR of the combined endpoint of thromboembolism, major bleeding and death, and adds important information on top of TTR in patients with MHV.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  International Normalized Ratio; Mechanical heart valve prostheses; Variability; Warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26558830     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.10.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  4 in total

1.  In-home Compared With In-Clinic Warfarin Therapy Monitoring in Mechanical Heart Valves: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Martin van Zyl; Waldemar E Wysokinski; Thomas M Jaeger; Ana I Casanegra; Bernard J Gersh; Robert D McBane
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-08-15

2.  Radiopaque Hemocompatible Ruminant-Sourced Gut Material with Antimicrobial Physiognomies for Biomedical Applications in Diabetics.

Authors:  Nimmy K Francis; Harpreet S Pawar; Santanu Dhara; Anirban Mitra; Analava Mitra
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-03-02

3.  Warfarin anticoagulation management during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of internet clinic and machine learning.

Authors:  Meng-Fei Dai; Shu-Yue Li; Ji-Fan Zhang; Bao-Yan Wang; Lin Zhou; Feng Yu; Hang Xu; Wei-Hong Ge
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  Outcomes related to anticoagulation management for mechanical valve replacements.

Authors:  Lauren V Huckaby; Laura M Seese; Thomas G Gleason; Ibrahim Sultan; Yisi Wang; Floyd Thoma; Arman Kilic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 2.895

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.