Thomas Kerr1, Kate Shannon, Lianping Ti, Steffanie Strathdee, Kanna Hayashi, Paul Nguyen, Julio Montaner, Evan Wood. 1. aBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS bDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada cDivision of Global Public Health, University of California San Diego Department of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although the global burden of HIV infection among sex workers (SW) has been well recognized, HIV-related risks among sex workers who inject drugs (SW-IDU) have received less attention. We investigated the relationship between sex work and HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (IDU) in a Canadian setting. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Using Kaplan-Meier methods and the extended Cox regression, we compared HIV incidence among SW-IDU and non-SW-IDU in Vancouver, Canada, after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2012, 1647 participants were included in the study, including 512 (31.1%) IDU engaged in sex work. At 5 years the HIV cumulative incidence was higher among SW-IDU in comparison to other IDU (12 vs. 7%, P = 0.001). In unadjusted Cox regression analyses, HIV incidence among SW-IDU was also elevated [relative hazard: 1.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-2.53]. However, in a multivariable analysis, sex work did not remain associated with HIV infection (adjusted relative hazard: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.45-1.20), with cocaine injection appearing to account for the elevated risk for HIV infection among SW-IDU. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that local SW-IDU have elevated rates of HIV infection. However, our exploration of risk factors among SW-IDU demonstrated that drug use patterns and environmental factors, rather than sexual risks, may explain the elevated HIV incidence among SW-IDU locally. Our findings highlight the need for social and structural interventions, including increased access to harm reduction programs and addiction treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Although the global burden of HIV infection among sex workers (SW) has been well recognized, HIV-related risks among sex workers who inject drugs (SW-IDU) have received less attention. We investigated the relationship between sex work and HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (IDU) in a Canadian setting. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Using Kaplan-Meier methods and the extended Cox regression, we compared HIV incidence among SW-IDU and non-SW-IDU in Vancouver, Canada, after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2012, 1647 participants were included in the study, including 512 (31.1%) IDU engaged in sex work. At 5 years the HIV cumulative incidence was higher among SW-IDU in comparison to other IDU (12 vs. 7%, P = 0.001). In unadjusted Cox regression analyses, HIV incidence among SW-IDU was also elevated [relative hazard: 1.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-2.53]. However, in a multivariable analysis, sex work did not remain associated with HIV infection (adjusted relative hazard: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.45-1.20), with cocaine injection appearing to account for the elevated risk for HIV infection among SW-IDU. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that local SW-IDU have elevated rates of HIV infection. However, our exploration of risk factors among SW-IDU demonstrated that drug use patterns and environmental factors, rather than sexual risks, may explain the elevated HIV incidence among SW-IDU locally. Our findings highlight the need for social and structural interventions, including increased access to harm reduction programs and addiction treatment.
Authors: Steffanie A Strathdee; Morgan M Philbin; Shirley J Semple; Minya Pu; Prisci Orozovich; Gustavo Martinez; Remedios Lozada; Miguel Fraga; Adela de la Torre; Hugo Staines; Carlos Magis-Rodríguez; Thomas L Patterson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kate Shannon; Steffanie A Strathdee; Shira M Goldenberg; Putu Duff; Peninah Mwangi; Maia Rusakova; Sushena Reza-Paul; Joseph Lau; Kathleen Deering; Michael R Pickles; Marie-Claude Boily Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Marie-Claude Couture; Jennifer L Evans; Neth San Sothy; Ellen S Stein; Keo Sichan; Lisa Maher; Kimberly Page Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Steffanie A Strathdee; Timothy B Hallett; Natalia Bobrova; Tim Rhodes; Robert Booth; Reychad Abdool; Catherine A Hankins Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-07-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Steffanie A Strathdee; Daniela Abramovitz; Remedios Lozada; Gustavo Martinez; Maria Gudelia Rangel; Alicia Vera; Hugo Staines; Carlos Magis-Rodriguez; Thomas L Patterson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elena Argento; Steffanie A Strathdee; Shira Goldenberg; Melissa Braschel; Julio Montaner; Kate Shannon Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Tyler S Bartholomew; Hansel E Tookes; Corinne Bullock; Jason Onugha; David W Forrest; Daniel J Feaster Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2020-03-05
Authors: Alberto Edeza; Angela Bazzi; Peter Salhaney; Dea Biancarelli; Ellen Childs; Matthew J Mimiaga; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Katie Biello Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Shannon N Ogden; Miriam Th Harris; Ellen Childs; Pablo K Valente; Alberto Edeza; Alexandra B Collins; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Matthew J Mimiaga; Katie B Biello; Angela R Bazzi Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2021-05-10
Authors: Glenn-Milo Santos; Steffanie A Strathdee; Nabila El-Bassel; Poonam Patel; Divya Subramanian; Danielle Horyniak; Ryan R Cook; Charlotte McCullagh; Phillip Marotta; Foram Choksi; Brian Kang; Isabel Allen; Steven Shoptaw Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 4.615