| Literature DB >> 26558705 |
Alden B Griffith1, Tania Ahmed2, Abigail L G Hildner2, Shivani Kuckreja2, Shuangxou Long2.
Abstract
Although most biological invasions are not successful, relatively few studies have examined otherwise notorious invaders in systems where they are not highly problematic. The annual grass Bromus tectorum is a dominant invader in western North America, but is usually confined to human-dominated and disturbed systems (e.g. roadsides and parking lots) in the East where it remains virtually unstudied. This study aims to address fundamental ecological questions regarding B. tectorum in a Cape Cod dune ecosystem. (i) What is the range of variation in population dynamics and the potential for population growth? (ii) Which factors influence its local abundance and distribution? We observed substantial variation in population dynamics over 3 years, with the number of adult B. tectorum individuals increasing substantially between the first 2 years (λ = 9.24) and then decreasing (λ = 0.43). Population growth in terms of total seeds was similarly variable, but to a lesser extent (λ = 2.32 followed by λ = 0.32). Experimental soil disturbance led to a more than 10-fold increase in mean seedling emergence, and high sensitivity to differences in emergence carried this effect through the life cycle. In contrast, barriers to seed dispersal had no effect on population dynamics, suggesting limited dispersal in this system. Across the landscape, the presence of B. tectorum was associated with areas of higher plant diversity as opposed to those with a strong dominant (e.g. the foredune, dominated by Ammophila breviligulata, or low heathlands, characterized by Hudsonia tomentosa and Arctostaphylos uva-ursi). Overall, we find that B. tectorum is capable of both substantial population growth and decline in a dune ecosystem, but is likely limited without disturbance and dispersal agents. Thus, management actions that restrict dune access (e.g. for nesting habitat) likely have the co-benefit of limiting the invasive potential of B. tectorum. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.Entities:
Keywords: Bromus tectorum; Cape Cod; cheatgrass; disturbance; invasion; population dynamics; seed dispersal
Year: 2015 PMID: 26558705 PMCID: PMC4676798 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plv126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Figure 1.Bromus tectorum population dynamics between 2012 and 2014. Values for (A) adult plant density and (C) total seed production are the sums of plot-level data for each of the three demographic sampling areas. (B) Fecundity values were calculated from the sums of plant and seed production density. (Sums were used instead of means due to zero values for some plots, and thus represent the combined area of six sampling plots). Symbols refer to spatially distinct sampling areas.
Population-level transition values between years. Annual growth rates (λ) are based on both changes in total adult plants and total seed production. The establishment and survival rates was estimated from the ratio of adult plants to seed production the previous year. Values are based on totals across all demographic plots.
| 2012–13 | 2013–14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Adult–adult annual growth rate, λadults | 9.24 | 0.43 |
| Seed–seed annual growth rate, λseeds | 2.32 | 0.32 |
| Establishment and survival (%) | 15.9 | 2.93 |
Figure 2.Results of the 2012/2013 seeding experiment. (A) Seedling emergence in April, (B) total adult plants in June and (C) total spikelets produced (values are back-transformed means ± 1 SE). (D) The LTRE analysis indicates how differences in life cycle transition values between the disturbed and control treatments contributed to differences in population growth rates (contributions to Δλ ± 95 % CI).
Figure 3.Multidimensional scaling analysis of plot-level plant community similarity in 2013 (excluding B. tectorum). Plots with and without B. tectorum are indicated and show significant separation (ANOSIM P = 0.03). The cover of common species (A–C) and overall plant diversity (D) within each plot is superimposed on the MDS.
Figure 4.Logistic regressions relating B. tectorum presence to (A–C) the cover of particular species and (D) overall plant diversity. Presence/absence axis values are jittered to minimize visual overlap of points.