Shirley P Yu1, Matthew Williams2, Jillian P Eyles2,3, Jian Sheng Chen3, Joanna Makovey3, David J Hunter1,3,4. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2. Department of Physiotherapy, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 3. Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 4. Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: Assessing the effectiveness of bracing treatment for tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) and patellofemoral OA in patients with knee OA. METHOD: This study was conducted within the Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program (OACCP), a 52-week multidisciplinary non-operative program for OA patients. All participants had symptomatic, radiographic knee OA. Knee bracing with Ossur Unloader One and Tru-pull Lite was offered for participants with medial/lateral tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA, respectively. Participants were assessed at weeks 0, 12, 26 and 52. The primary outcome was knee pain and function at week 52, as assessed by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain and activities of daily living (ADL) scores. Linear regression models were used to compare effectiveness for pain and function between three groups (patellofemoral bracing, tibiofemoral bracing and no bracing). RESULT: There were 204 participants; 50 assigned patellofemoral bracing, 86 tibiofemoral bracing and 68 with no bracing. Mean baseline KOOS pain score was 52.9, 41.7 and 43.3 (0-100 scale where 100 represents normal) and mean baseline KOOS ADL score was 55.8, 43.7 and 43.1 for the three groups, respectively. Significant improvements were found in each group at week 52 for KOOS pain score and KOOS ADL. There was no significant difference in KOOS pain (P = 0.12) and ADL score (P = 0.13) at week 52 between the three brace types after adjusting for baseline variables. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary non-operative program improved pain and function in persons with patellofemoral and tibiofemoral OA. However, wearing a patellofemoral or a tibiofemoral brace did not appear to provide additional benefits.
AIM: Assessing the effectiveness of bracing treatment for tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) and patellofemoral OA in patients with knee OA. METHOD: This study was conducted within the Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program (OACCP), a 52-week multidisciplinary non-operative program for OA patients. All participants had symptomatic, radiographic knee OA. Knee bracing with Ossur Unloader One and Tru-pull Lite was offered for participants with medial/lateral tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA, respectively. Participants were assessed at weeks 0, 12, 26 and 52. The primary outcome was knee pain and function at week 52, as assessed by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain and activities of daily living (ADL) scores. Linear regression models were used to compare effectiveness for pain and function between three groups (patellofemoral bracing, tibiofemoral bracing and no bracing). RESULT: There were 204 participants; 50 assigned patellofemoral bracing, 86 tibiofemoral bracing and 68 with no bracing. Mean baseline KOOS pain score was 52.9, 41.7 and 43.3 (0-100 scale where 100 represents normal) and mean baseline KOOS ADL score was 55.8, 43.7 and 43.1 for the three groups, respectively. Significant improvements were found in each group at week 52 for KOOS pain score and KOOS ADL. There was no significant difference in KOOS pain (P = 0.12) and ADL score (P = 0.13) at week 52 between the three brace types after adjusting for baseline variables. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary non-operative program improved pain and function in persons with patellofemoral and tibiofemoral OA. However, wearing a patellofemoral or a tibiofemoral brace did not appear to provide additional benefits.
Authors: Corey W Hunter; Timothy R Deer; Mark R Jones; George C Chang Chien; Ryan S D'Souza; Timothy Davis; Erica R Eldon; Michael F Esposito; Johnathan H Goree; Lissa Hewan-Lowe; Jillian A Maloney; Anthony J Mazzola; John S Michels; Annie Layno-Moses; Shachi Patel; Jeanmarie Tari; Jacqueline S Weisbein; Krista A Goulding; Anikar Chhabra; Jeffrey Hassebrock; Chris Wie; Douglas Beall; Dawood Sayed; Natalie Strand Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 2.832
Authors: Michael DeRogatis; Hiba K Anis; Nipun Sodhi; Joseph O Ehiorobo; Morad Chughtai; Anil Bhave; Michael A Mont Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2019-10
Authors: Melanie A Holden; Michael Callaghan; David Felson; Fraser Birrell; Elaine Nicholls; Sue Jowett; J Kigozi; John McBeth; Belinda Borrelli; Clare Jinks; Nadine E Foster; Krysia Dziedzic; Christian Mallen; Carol Ingram; Alan Sutton; Sarah Lawton; Nicola Halliday; Liz Hartshorne; Helen Williams; Rachel Browell; Hannah Hudson; Michelle Marshall; Gail Sowden; Dan Herron; Evans Asamane; George Peat Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Lorenzo Pradelli; Tiziana Sinigaglia; Alberto Migliore; Giovanni Antonio Checchia; Francesco Franceschi; Bruno Frediani; Florenzo Iannone; Emilio Romanini Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 2.423