| Literature DB >> 26558183 |
P Vinayaga Moorthi1, C Balasubramanian1, S Selvarani1, A Radha2.
Abstract
In the present investigation, impact of sub lethal concentrations of entomopathogenic fungi, namely Isaria fumosorosea, Beauveria bassiana and Paecilomyces variotii, secondary metabolite on feeding, growth, fecundity and hatchability of Spodoptera litura was performed. The S. litura treated with I. fumosorosea and B. bassiana metabolites exhibited renounced food consumption. The growth rate of treated S. litura with metabolite of I. fumosorosea had drastic reduction. In the case of approximate digestibility (AD), maximum impact was established by the I. fumosorosea isolate, which significantly reduced the approximate digestibility of the IV and V instar larvae. The III instar larvae of S. litura treated with I. fumosorosea metabolite showed significantly lower efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) and efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) values than IV and V instars. However the performance of metabolites on fecundity and hatchability of S. litura was immense. Therefore, metabolites of I. fumosorosea could be reliable biocontrol agent, which has been highly recommended for S. litura management in commercial crops.Entities:
Keywords: Beauveria bassiana; Growth rate; Isaria fumosorosea; Paecilomyces variotii; Secondary metabolite; Spodoptera litura
Year: 2015 PMID: 26558183 PMCID: PMC4636509 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1437-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Effect of ethyl acetate fraction of Isaria fumosorosea on the growth rate, consumption index and approximate digestibility of 3rd, 4th and 5th instar larvae of Spodoptera litura
|
| CI | GR | AD | ECD | ECI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd | |||||
| C | 0.892 ± 0.002a | 0.193 ± 0.001a | 99.09 ± 0.047a | 23.80 ± 0.057a | 22.30 ± 0.085b |
| 1 | 0.310 ± 0.017b | 0.189 ± 0.001c | 97.93 ± 0.028b | 23.01 ± 0.077b | 23.07 ± 0.069a |
| 2 | 0.226 ± 0.003e | 0.185 ± 0.001d | 97.16 ± 0.023c | 18.44 ± 0.068c | 17.92 ± 0.024c |
| 3 | 0.251 ± 0.003d | 0.183 ± 0.001b | 96.92 ± 0.002d | 17.89 ± 0.029d | 17.52 ± 0.026d |
| 4 | 0.276 ± 0.001c | 0.180 ± 0.0004a | 96.92 ± 0.030d | 11.00 ± 0.081c | 10.92 ± 0.012e |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.134 | 0.067 | 0.044 |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.092 | 0.046 | 0.030 |
| 4th | |||||
| C | 0.926 ± 0.001a | 0.198 ± 0.0008a | 98.71 ± 0.123a | 96.52 ± 0.098a | 99.23 ± 0.183a |
| 1 | 0.147 ± 0.001e | 0.197 ± 0.0008b | 95.86 ± 0.050b | 95.46 ± 0.098a | 99.14 ± 0.446a |
| 2 | 0.280 ± 0.012b | 0.192 ± 0.0008c | 91.12 ± 0.138c | 95.34 ± 0.014a | 99.04a ± 0.438b |
| 3 | 0.247 ± 0.001c | 0.187 ± 0.0008c | 90.32 ± 0.106d | 94.36 ± 0.094a | 98.91 ± 0.116b |
| 4 | 0.234 ± 0.002d | 0.185 ± 0.001d | 89.52 ± 0.077e | 80.00 ± 0.172b | 74.17 ± 0.130c |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.126 | 1.79 | 1.334 |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.087 | 1.27 | 0.917 |
| 5th | |||||
| C | 1.112 ± 0.003a | 0.201 ± 0.0008a | 97.34 ± 0.046a | 97.92 ± 0.069d | 99.54 ± 0.087a |
| 1 | 1.077 ± 0.020b | 0.195 ± 0.001b | 91.34 ± 0.046b | 96.72 ± 0.111b | 99.53 ± 0.033a |
| 2 | 1.060 ± 0.020c | 0.189 ± 0.001c | 90.32 ± 0.053c | 96.24 ± 0.086c | 99.25 ± 0.082b |
| 3 | 0.867 ± 0.002d | 0.187 ± 0.001c | 89.17 ± 0.058d | 96.47 ± 0.077a | 99.17 ± 0.045c |
| 4 | 0.838 ± 0.003e | 0.181 ± 0.001c | 88.05 ± 0.061e | 96.87 ± 0.048e | 99.03 ± 0.073d |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.023 | 0.050 | 0.147 |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.016 | 0.035 | 0.105 |
CI consumption index, GR growth rate, AD approximate digestibility, ECD efficiency of conversion of digested food, ECI efficiency of conversion of ingested food
a,b,c,d CD critical difference values were significant at 0.01 and 0.05 % level
Effect of fraction of Paecilomyces variotii on the growth rate, consumption index and approximate digestibility 3rd, 4th and 5th instar larvae of Spodoptera litura
|
| CI | GR | AD | ECD | ECI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd | |||||
| C | 0.867 ± 0.003a | 0.200 ± 0.001a | 96.92 ± 0.038a | 94.27 ± 0.014a | 98.11 ± 0.04a |
| 1 | 0.694 ± 0.011b | 0.196 ± 0.001b | 89.47 ± 0.089b | 93.25 ± 0.29b | 97.61 ± 0.11b |
| 2 | 0.615 ± 0.61c | 0.194 ± 0.002c | 88.67 ± 0.036b | 92.46 ± 0.18d | 97.36 ± 0.17c |
| 3 | 0.580 ± 0.012d | 0.194 ± 0.001c | 85.71 ± 0.084b | 92.87 ± 0.17c | 97.22 ± 0.34d |
| 4 | 0.471 ± 0.003e | 0.193 ± 0.002c | 83.33 ± 0.019c | 23.01 ± 0.39e | 22.30 ± 0.06e |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 2.397 | 0.043 | 0.042 |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.045 | 0.002 | 1.648 | 0.030 | 0.029 |
| 4th | |||||
| C | 0.926 ± 0.002a | 0.207 ± 0.000a | 92.71 ± 0.123a | 91.32 ± 0.026a | 99.54 ± 0.098a |
| 1 | 0.227 ± 0.000b | 0.198 ± 0.001b | 91.33 ± 0.026d | 89.54 ± 0.086b | 99.54 ± 0.192a |
| 2 | 0.190 ± 0.003c | 0.192 ± 0.001c | 89.74 ± 0.070b | 89.10 ± 0.070b | 99.43 ± 0.184ab |
| 3 | 0.140 ± 0.004e | 0.191 ± 0.000d | 89.33 ± 0.026c | 87.64 ± 0.026c | 99.36 ± 0.061a |
| 4 | 0.161 ± 0.001d | 0.187 ± 0.000e | 87.64 ± 0.049e | 80.50 ± 0.102d | 74.17 ± 0.050c |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.008 | 1.533 | 0.035 | 0.162 |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 1.054 | 0.024 | 0.111 |
| 5th | |||||
| C | 1.006 ± 0.002a | 0.215 ± 0.000a | 94.62 ± 0.066a | 96.47 ± 0.104a | 99.46 ± 0.053a |
| 1 | 0.241 ± 0.001b | 0.192 ± 0.001b | 93.07 ± 0.041b | 96.37 ± 0.184b | 99.09 ± 0.024c |
| 2 | 0.115 ± 0.001d | 0.190 ± 0.002c | 92.68 ± 0.085c | 95.47 ± 0.086c | 99.38 ± 0.046b |
| 3 | 0.107 ± 0.002e | 0.187 ± 0.000d | 92.02 ± 0.390d | 95.46 ± 0.140c | 99.03 ± 0.045d |
| 4 | 0.139 ± 0.001c | 0.175 ± 0.000e | 91.34 ± 0.057e | 94.36 ± 0.180d | 98.78 ± 0.037e |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.036 | 0.117 | 0.120 |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.025 | 0.080 | 0.083 |
CI consumption index, GR growth rate, AD approximate digestibility, ECD efficiency of conversion of digested food, ECI efficiency of conversion of ingested food
a,b,c,d CD critical difference values were significant at 0.01 and 0.05 % level
Effect of ethyl acetate fraction of Beauveria bassiana on the growth rate, consumption index and approximate digestibility of 3rd, 4th and 5th instar larvae of Spodoptera litura
|
| CI | GR | AD | ECD | ECI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd | |||||
| C | 1.94 ± 0.002a | 0.199 ± 0.003ab | 99.01 ± 0.085a | 23.01 ± 0.100a | 22.90 ± 0.065b |
| 1 | 1.77 ± 0.001b | 0.195 ± 0.000c | 97.93 ± 0.057b | 22.93 ± 0.156a | 98.00 ± 0.054a |
| 2 | 1.42 ± 0.001c | 0.191 ± 0.001b | 96.92 ± 0.041c | 14.5 ± 0.143b | 14.70 ± 0.037c |
| 3 | 1.36 ± 0.003d | 0.189 ± 0.001ab | 96.26 ± 0.150d | 14.8 ± 0.132b | 14.70 ± 0.022c |
| 4 | 0.867 ± 0.002c | 0.176 ± 0.000c | 92.45 ± 0.040e | 12.24 ± 0.190c | 11.33 ± 0.066d |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.009 | 0.003 | 0.089 | 0.324 | 0.310 |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.061 | 0.223 | 0.213 |
| 4th | |||||
| C | 1.017 ± 0.002a | 0.201 ± 0.002c | 96.92 ± 0.061a | 83.11 ± 0.123a | 81.90 ± 0.046a |
| 1 | 0.624 ± 0.000b | 0.192 ± 0.000b | 96.11 ± 0.021b | 69.00 ± 0.141a | 64.18 ± 0.047a |
| 2 | 0.310 ± 0.000e | 0.189 ± 0.001ab | 93.45 ± 0.034d | 68.22 ± 0.138a | 62.93 ± 0.047b |
| 3 | 0.317 ± 0.003d | 0.187 ± 0.000a | 89.24 ± 0.032e | 58.11 ± 0.147b | 55.28 ± 0.094c |
| 4 | 0.361 ± 0.001c | 0.171 ± 0.001b | 87.12 ± 0.078c | 33.33 ± 0.132c | 32.00 ± 0.074d |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.130 | 0.002 |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.089 | 0.002 |
| 5th | |||||
| C | 1.091 ± 0.002a | 0.202 ± 0.002a | 96.92 ± 0.047a | 98.42 ± 0.111a | 93.24 ± 0.047b |
| 1 | 0.297 ± 0.000b | 0.191 ± 0.001b | 88.80 ± 0.047b | 94.36 ± 0.145c | 83.0 ± 0.0081c |
| 2 | 0.229 ± 0.002c | 0.190 ± 0.001b | 87.75 ± 0.081c | 76.36 ± 0.156b | 71.26 ± 0.009a |
| 3 | 0.183 ± 0.002e | 0.186 ± 0.002ab | 86.33 ± 0.094d | 54.36 ± 0.141b | 49.23 ± 0.081a |
| 4 | 0.217 ± 0.006d | 0.169 ± 0.002c | 86.33 ± 0.094d | 23.01 ± 0.127d | 22.90 ± 0.047d |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.039 | 0.958 | 1.974 |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.027 | 0.657 | 1.357 |
CI consumption index, GR growth rate, AD approximate digestibility, ECD efficiency of conversion of digested food, ECI efficiency of conversion of ingested food
a,b,c,d CD critical difference values were significant at 0.01 and 0.05 % level
One tailed t test analysis for control and treatment groups of the CI, GR, AD, ECD and ECI of instars of Spodoptera litura treated with Entomopathogenic fungal fraction
| Consumption index | Growth rate | Approximate digestibility | Efficiency of conversion of digested food | Efficiency of conversion of ingested food | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| III | IV | V | III | IV | V | III | IV | V | III | IV | V | III | IV | V | |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Df | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| t Stat | 2.46 | 25.06 | 33.84 | 3.18 | 2.71 | 4.25 | 5.960 | 4.861 | 9.412 | 2.15 | 1.41 | 10.34 | 2.37 | 1.04 | 2.51 |
| P(T ≤ t) one-tail | 0.04* | 6 × 10−5** | 2 × 10−5** | 0.02* | 0.03* | 0.01* | 0.004** | 0.008** | 0.001** | 0.06* | 0.12 | 0.0009** | 0.048* | 0.18ns | 0.04* |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Df | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| t Stat | 5.96 | 38.05 | 26.91 | 5.96 | 6.58 | 9.79 | 6.86 | 4.12 | 1.22 | 1.08 | 2.17 | 2.48ns | 1.04 | 1.03 | 2.93 |
| P(T ≤ t) one-tail | 0.004* | 2 × 10−05** | 5 × 10−05** | 0.004** | 0.003** | 0.001** | 0.003** | 0.012* | 0.15ns | 0.17ns | 0.05* | 0.04* | 0.18ns | 0.18ns | 0.03* |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Df | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| t Stat | 3.11 | 8.10 | 33.01 | 2.56 | 3.16 | 3.16 | 2.65 | 2.57 | 15.69 | 2.94 | 3.11 | 2.28 | 0.53 | 3.78 | 2.76 |
| P(T ≤ t) one-tail | 0.026 | 0.001 | 3 × 10−05 | 0.04 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.038 | 0.040 | 0.000 | 0.030 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
ns not significant at 0.05 % level
* Significant at 0.05 %
** Significant at 0.01 % level
Effect of fraction of entomopathogenic fungi on the fecundity and hatchability of against Spodoptera litura
| Fungi | Concentration (ppm) | Eggs laid/batch | Eggs hatched | Pupa emerged | Malformed pupa | Adult emerged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Control | 176.04 ± 0.049a | 95.45 ± 0.106a | 96.00 ± 0.047a | 0.00a | 92.00 ± 0.433a |
| 1 | 167.97 ± 0.055b | 94.61 ± 0.120b | 76.00 ± 0.064b | 4.00 ± 0.047b | 72.00 ± 0.047b | |
| 2 | 124.33 ± 0.085c | 87.09 ± 0.180c | 72.00 ± 0.623c | 4.00 ± 0.117c | 68.00 ± 0.004c | |
| 3 | 84.03 ± 0.057d | 42.00 ± 0.047d | 28.00 ± 0.458d | 12.00 ± 0.108d | 16.00 ± 0.816d | |
| 4 | 67.03 ± 0.057e | 40.29 ± 0.064e | 24.00 ± 0.204e | 12.00 ± 0.131e | 12.00 ± 0.816e | |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.049 | 0.028 | 0.079 | 0.353 | 0.101 | |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.034 | 0.019 | 0.056 | 0.248 | 0.071 | |
|
| Control | 148 ± 0.020a | 98.46 ± 0.080a | 98.93 ± 0.016a | 0.33 ± 0.471c | 99.91 ± 0.115a |
| 1 | 118 ± 0.612b | 89.78 ± 0.128b | 84.00 ± 0.081b | 0.67 ± 0.471c | 84.00 ± 0.084b | |
| 2 | 114 ± 0.122c | 72.88 ± 0.080c | 80.00 ± 0.151c | 4.00 ± 0.365b | 76.00 ± 0.426c | |
| 3 | 96 ± 0.188d | 55.76 ± 0.166d | 68.00 ± 0.147d | 4.00 ± 1.247b | 60.00 ± 0.204d | |
| 4 | 87 ± 0.069e | 51.04 ± 0.376e | 52.00 ± 0.440e | 8.00 ± 0.081a | 44.00 ± 0.382e | |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.263 | 0.459 | 3.906 | 3.592 | 3.526 | |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.143 | 0.322 | 2.746 | 2.526 | 2.479 | |
|
| Control | 149 ± 0.131a | 92.61 ± 0.201a | 99.91 ± 0.115a | 4.00 ± 0.540c | 96.00 ± 0.358a |
| 1 | 136 ± 0.099b | 86.76 ± 0.147b | 92.00 ± 0.092b | 4.00 ± 0.071c | 88.00 ± 0.128b | |
| 2 | 118 ± 0.184c | 76.27 ± 0.257c | 84.00 ± 0.154c | 4.00 ± 0.094c | 80.00 ± 0.154c | |
| 3 | 96 ± 0.062d | 56.25 ± 0.277d | 48.00 ± 0.540d | 18.00 ± 0.108a | 40.00 ± 0.104d | |
| 4 | 84 ± 0.201e | 32.54 ± 0.148e | 32.00 ± 0.071e | 12.00 ± 0.530b | 20.00 ± 0.157e | |
| CD at 0.01 | 0.331 | 0.529 | 0.484 | 0.391 | 0.786 | |
| CD at 0.05 | 0.200 | 0.319 | 0.292 | 0.235 | 0.474 |
Values are mean ± SD of three replication
a,b,c,d CD critical difference values were significant at 0.01 and 0.05 % level
Fig. 1Impact sub lethal dose of secondary metabolite of Isaria fumosorosea on larvae and pupa and egg of Spodoptera litura. a, b Infected larvae and its enlarged image; c dead larvae; d unhatched eggs and hatched larvae; e pupa (control); f, g, h different type of infected pupa