Literature DB >> 2655811

Preoperative assessment of mesorectal lymph node involvement in rectal cancer.

J Beynon1, N J Mortensen, D M Foy, J L Channer, H Rigby, J Virjee.   

Abstract

One hundred patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were examined preoperatively with rectal endosonography (ES) and 50 were also examined with computed tomography (CT). ES predicted mesorectal lymph node involvement with an accuracy of 83 per cent, sensitivity of 88 per cent, specificity of 79 per cent, positive predictive value of 78 per cent and negative predictive value of 89 per cent. CT in comparison had an accuracy of 57 per cent, sensitivity of 25 per cent, specificity of 91 per cent, positive predictive value of 75 per cent and negative predictive value of 53 per cent. No particular histological architectural feature could be identified as responsible for false positive diagnosis though nodal size was significantly larger in the true positive and false positive group when compared with the true negatives (P less than 0.001 and P less than 0.01 respectively).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2655811     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800760320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  28 in total

Review 1.  New diagnostic imaging in rectal cancer: endosonography and immunoscintigraphy.

Authors:  G Feifel; U Hildebrandt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  James S Wu; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Rectal and anal endosonography.

Authors:  N Mortensen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The role of endocavitary irradiation for limited lesions of the rectum.

Authors:  B Sischy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  High magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy or high frequency 20 MHz mini probe endoscopic ultrasound staging for early colorectal neoplasia: a comparative prospective analysis.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone; S Brown; S S Cross; A J Shorthouse; D S Sanders
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  General surgery.

Authors:  I Taylor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 7.  Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung-Keun Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  General surgery.

Authors:  I Taylor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Endorectal sonography in the management of rectal villous tumours.

Authors:  H Mosnier; M Guivarc'h; B Meduri; J Fritsch; F Outters
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Multidisciplinary teams in the management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Vincent J Obias; Harry L Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.