| Literature DB >> 26557700 |
Hyung Kwon Byeon1, Ji Hyuk Han1, Byeong Il Choi1, Hye Jin Hwang1, Ji-Hoon Kim1, Hong-Shik Choi1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Conventional surgical techniques of laryngomicrosurgery (LMS) on hemorrhagic vocal polyps are often difficult due to obscuration of the surgical field by inadvertent bleeding from the lesion, and there are often significant amounts of mucosal epithelium loss. Here, we introduce our surgical technique using pulsed dye laser (PDL), which can effectively resect the polyp with vocal fold mucosa preservation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26557700 PMCID: PMC4628719 DOI: 10.1155/2015/820654
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Intraoperative view of pulsed dye laser- (PDL-) assisted enucleation laryngomicrosurgery. (a) After suspension laryngoscopy under general anesthesia, a hemorrhagic vocal polyp is noted on the right vocal fold. (b) The PDL is delivered by a 0.6 mm fiber (arrow), which is held directly over the surface of the hemorrhagic polyp. The treated portion of the vocal fold can be confirmed by the blanching change of the epithelium. (c) After the PDL application, a longitudinal incision is made at the overlying epithelium. (d) The epithelium is easily peeled off from the lesion and opened using a small cotton ball mounted on microforceps. (e) After careful dissection with appropriate microinstruments, the hemorrhagic polyp is easily enucleated out using microcurved alligator forceps. (f) The remaining epithelium is repositioned after removal of the lesion.
Figure 2(a) Preoperative laryngeal stroboscopic images. A typical hemorrhagic vocal polyp with a sessile base is noted on the left vocal fold. (b) Laryngeal stroboscopic images taken two months after the operation. Notice the preservation of the mucosal wave.
Voice quality improvement after the operation.
| Preoperative | Postoperative |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aerodynamic measures, mean (SD) | |||
| MPT (sec) | 12.43 (5.73) | 14.35 (5.50) | 0.084 |
| MFR (L/sec) | 0.16 (0.13) | 0.11 (0.09) | 0.005* |
| Psub (cmH20) | 6.80 (2.08) | 6.23 (2.28) | 0.287 |
|
| |||
| EGG analysis, mean (SD) | |||
| CQ (%) | 42.42 (5.45) | 42.91 (8.06) | 0.728 |
| CFx (%) | 12.50 (10.89) | 9.54 (6.83) | 0.197 |
| CAx (%) | 6.86 (3.41) | 6.35 (4.60) | 0.515 |
|
| |||
| Acoustic analysis, mean (SD) | |||
|
| 158.62 (38.14) | 157.21 (41.61) | 0.630 |
| NHR | 0.15 (0.03) | 0.14 (0.02) | 0.121 |
| Jitter (%) | 2.33 (1.58) | 1.50 (0.87) | 0.006* |
| Shimmer (%) | 4.55 (2.92) | 3.70 (1.61) | 0.134 |
|
| |||
| Patient-perceived satisfaction, mean (SD) | |||
| VHI score | 40.82 (28.62) | 13.96 (13.50) | <0.001* |
|
| |||
| Auditory perceptual judgment, mean (SD) | |||
| G | 1.32 (0.54) | 0.63 (0.46) | <0.001* |
| R | 0.57 (0.40) | 0.26 (0.38) | <0.001* |
| B | 0.86 (0.48) | 0.37 (0.32) | <0.001* |
| A | 0.03 (0.19) | 0 (0) | 0.326 |
| S | 0.32 (0.36) | 0.18 (0.24) | 0.004* |
IQR: interquartile range; MPT: maximum phonation time; MFR: mean airflow rate; Psub: subglottic pressure; CQ: closed quotient; CFx: irregularity of frequency; CAx: irregularity of amplitude; F0: average fundamental frequency; NHR: noise-to-harmonic ratio; VHI: voice handicap index; G: grade; R: roughness; B: breathiness; A: asthenia; S: strain.
∗ refers to the values that are statistically significant (P value < 0.05).