Literature DB >> 26557569

Expectant Versus Surgical Management of Early Pregnancy Miscarriages- A Prospective Study.

Reshma Sajan1, Mumtaz Pulikkathodi2, Abdul Vahab3, Valsan Mankara Kunjitty4, Hassan Sheikh Imrana5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical, medical and expectant management are the various options available to manage early pregnancy miscarriages; each with its own merits and demerits. In the last two decades, the efficacy and safety of expectant management which allows for the spontaneous passage of retained products of conception has been studied and confirmed. AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of expectant management of early pregnancy miscarriages with surgical uterine evacuation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study conducted in tertiary care centre for 5 years, included 212 patients with USG confirmed pregnancy miscarriages of less than 13 weeks, who were allocated to expectant management (Cases, n=112) and surgical evacuation (Control, n=100). Patients were allocated for expectant management as outpatients for 2 weeks, without any intervention till they had spontaneous complete miscarriage which was confirmed by sonography. Those who failed to do so, underwent a planned surgical uterine evacuation. Emergency admission and evacuation was done, if the patients became symptomatic in the waiting period. Patients allocated to surgical group underwent planned surgical evacuation once diagnosed. Success rate and complications like emergency evacuation, vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, limitation of physical activity and patient satisfaction were assessed. Both groups were followed up for 6 more weeks. Statistical analysis was done with Z-test.
RESULTS: Success rate of the expectant management was 71% as against 97% in surgical group. Severe vaginal bleeding was comparable (5% in both groups), 8% of expectant had severe abdominal pain versus 4% in surgical group. Unplanned admissions and emergency evacuation rate was high in expectant 9% against 1% in surgical group. Twenty one percent patients in expectant and 17% patients in surgical group experienced limitation of physical activity. Overall patient satisfaction rate was comparable (74% in expectant 80% in surgical group).
CONCLUSION: Expectant management of miscarriages has a success rate of 71%. Compared to surgical management, abdominal pain, unplanned admissions, emergency evacuation and limitation of physical activity were more in expectant group. Success rate can be improved and complications can be minimised with proper patient selection and counseling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anembryonic pregnancy; Early fetal demise; Expectant management; Incomplete miscarriage

Year:  2015        PMID: 26557569      PMCID: PMC4625288          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14803.6613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  21 in total

1.  Expectant management versus elective curettage for the treatment of spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  W W Hurd; R R Whitfield; J F Randolph; M L Kercher
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage.

Authors:  K Nanda; A Peloggia; D Grimes; L Lopez; G Nanda
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

Review 3.  Modern management of miscarriage: is there a place for non-surgical treatment?

Authors:  D Jurkovic
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Spontaneous abortion: a randomized, controlled trial comparing surgical evacuation with conservative management using misoprostol.

Authors:  T K Chung; D T Lee; L P Cheung; C J Haines; A M Chang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Expectant management of miscarriage--prediction of outcome using ultrasound and novel biochemical markers.

Authors:  J Elson; A Tailor; R Salim; K Hillaby; T Dew; D Jurkovic
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  The role of ultrasound in the expectant management of early pregnancy loss.

Authors:  S Sairam; M Khare; G Michailidis; B Thilaganathan
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  A comparison of medical management with misoprostol and surgical management for early pregnancy failure.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Jerry M Gilles; Kurt Barnhart; Mitchell D Creinin; Carolyn Westhoff; Margaret M Frederick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Expectant management versus surgical evacuation in first trimester miscarriage: health-related quality of life in randomized and non-randomized patients.

Authors:  Margreet Wieringa-De Waard; Esther E Hartman; Willem M Ankum; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick J E Bindels; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Management of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial of expectant management versus surgical evacuation.

Authors:  Margreet Wieringa-de Waard; Jeroen Vos; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick J E Bindels; Willem M Ankum
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  A randomized controlled trial comparing medical and expectant management of first trimester miscarriage.

Authors:  J S Bagratee; V Khullar; L Regan; J Moodley; H Kagoro
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  1 in total

1.  Relationship between HLA-DPA1 genetic polymorphism and anembryonic pregnancy.

Authors:  Zhendong Wang; Xiaolin Lu; Xiuying Yao; Xinli Liu; Linlin Zhao; Shaoyan Chang; Ting Zhang; Bo Niu; Li Wang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.183

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.