| Literature DB >> 26557115 |
Thomas Guillard1, Pascal Cholley2, Anne Limelette1, Didier Hocquet2, Lucie Matton1, Christophe Guyeux3, Anne-Laure Lebreil4, Odile Bajolet1, Lucien Brasme1, Janick Madoux5, Véronique Vernet-Garnier1, Coralie Barbe6, Xavier Bertrand2, Christophe de Champs On Behalf Of CarbaFrEst Group1.
Abstract
Fluoroquinolone (FQ) agents are a potential resort to treat infection due to Enterobacteriaceae producing extended spectrum β-lactamase and susceptible to FQ. In a context of increase of non-susceptibility to carbapenems among Enterobacteriaceae, we characterized FQ resistance mechanisms in 75 Enterobacter cloacae isolates non-susceptible to ertapenem in North-Eastern France in 2012 and describe the population structure by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST). Among them, 14.7% (12/75) carried a carbapenemase-encoding gene. Except one isolate producing VIM-1, the carbapenemase-producing isolates carried the well-known IncL/M pOXA48a plasmid. Most of the isolates (59/75) harbored at least a FQ-R determinant. qnr genes were predominant (40%, 30/75). The MLST study revealed that E. cloacae isolates' clonality was wide [24 different sequence types (STs)]. The more widespread STs were ST74, ST101, ST110, ST114, and ST133. Carbapenem MICs were higher for E. cloacae ST74 than for other E. cloacae isolates. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants were more often observed in E. cloacae ST74 isolates. These findings showed that (i) pOXA-48a is spreading in North-Eastern France, (ii) qnr is preponderant in E. cloacae, (iii) E. cloacae comprised a large amount of lineages spreading in North-Eastern France, and (iv) FQ as an alternative to β-lactams to treat ertapenem non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae are compromised.Entities:
Keywords: Carbapenem; Enterobacter cloacae; Fluoroquinolones; MLST; PMQR; QRDR
Year: 2015 PMID: 26557115 PMCID: PMC4616961 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Fluoroquinolones MIC (μg/mL) among the clinical and the screening Enterobacter cloacae isolates.
| Nalidixic acid | Norfloxacin | Ciprofloxacin | Ofloxacin | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC50 | MIC90 | Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | Range | ||
| Screening isolates | 26 | >256 | >256 | 3->256 | >256 | >256 | 0,125–>256 | >32 | >32 | 0,016–>32 | > 32 | >32 | 0,125–>32 |
| Clinical isolates | 49 | >256 | >256 | 0,19->256 | 12 | >256 | 0,064–>256 | 2 | >32 | 0,012–>32 | 8 | >32 | 0,094–>32 |
| Urines | 22 | >256 | >256 | 2->256 | 9 | >256 | 0,064–>256 | 2 | >32 | 0,012–>32 | 6 | >32 | 0,094–>32 |
Contribution of efflux and reduced outer membrane permeability to carbapenems for E. cloacae strains resistant to ertapenem.
| Strain | ST | β-lactamases | MIC (μg/mL) | SDS PAGE | Relative expressiona | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ertapenem | Imipenem | Doripenem | Meropenem | |||||||
| 12 01 033 | 133 | SHV-12, CTX-M-9, overexpressed AmpC | >32 | 16 | 4 | 6 | Loss of OmpC | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.51 |
| 12 01 040 | 133 | SHV-12, CTX-M-9, overexpressed AmpC | >32 | 12 | 4 | 12 | Loss of OmpC | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.7 |
| 12 05 006 | 175 | SHV-12, overexpressed AmpC | 32 | 2 | 0.75 | 1 | Loss of OmpF | 0.05 | 0.11 | 2.28 |
| 12 03 029 | 74 | CTX-M-15 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | – | 0.44 | 0.22 | 2.76 |
| 12 06 020 | 102 | – | 1.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | – | 0.52 | 0.36 | 2.12 |
| 12 05 004 | 74 | OXA-48, CTX-M-15 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.75 | 1.5 | – | 3.15 | 0.54 | 9 |
| 12 03 022 | 110 | OXA-48, CTX-M-15 | 3 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.5 | Modified porins | 3.23 | 0.009 | 6.57 |
| 12 03 028 | 74 | OXA-48, CTX-M-15 | 2 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.75 | - | 0.44 | 0.22 | 2.76 |
Mutations observed in QRDR of E. cloacae isolates.
| Amino acid substitutions | No. of isolates (Total of 75) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| GyrA | ParC | ||
| Ser/Thr83 | Asn87 | Ser80 | |
| – | – | – | 20 |
| Ile | – | – | 19 |
| Ile | – | Ile | 1 |
| Phe | – | – | 11 |
| Phe | – | Ile | 1 |
| Phe | Asn | – | 2 |
| Phe | Asn | Ile | 10 |
| Phe | Gly | Ile | 3 |
| Leu | – | Ile | 1 |
| Tyr | – | – | 6 |
| Tyr | His | Ile | 1 |
Prevalence of QRDR mutations in PMQR-carrying and PMQR negative E. cloacae isolatesa.
| PMQR+ | PMQR– | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QRDR+ | 19 | 82.6% | 24 | 60.0% |
| QRDR– | 4 | 16.4% | 16 | 40.0% |
| 0 mutation | 4 | 17.4% | 16 | 40.0% |
| 1 mutation | 17 | 74.0% | 9 | 22.5% |
| 2 mutations | 2 | 8.6% | 2 | 5.0% |
| 3 mutations | 0 | 0.0% | 13 | 32.5% |
| 23 | 40 | |||
E. cloacae STs identified in our study: clonal status, pulsotypes, centres, prevalence, carbapenem MIC and β-lactamases.
| CC (ST)a | PFGE profiles | Centres | Isolates ( | Median MIC (range; μg/mL) | β-lactamases (number of isolates)b,c | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem | Ertapenem | Doripenem | Meropenem | |||||||||
| 42 (101, 104, 108) | 2,8,10,14,17–20 | UH1, UH3, UH4, UH5, GH1, GH2 | 13 | 0.38 | (0.13–1) | 1 | (0.75–4) | 0.125 | (0.047–0.75) | 0.125 | (0.064–0.5) | SHV-12 ( |
| 74 (74) | 31–33,35,41 | UH2, UH3, UH4, UH5, GH2, | 16 | 0.62 | (0.13–2) | 2 | (0.75–12) | 0.25 | (0.064–1) | 0.44 | (0.064–2) | OXA-48 ( |
| 114 (66,114) | 3,5,40 | UH1, UH3, UH5 | 7 | 0.38 | (0.13–2) | 2 | (1–6) | 0.125 | (0.064–0.38) | 0.19 | (0.125–0.5) | CTX-M-9 ( |
| 133 (93, 103,133) | 15,21,23,38,39 | UH3, UH4, UH5, | 10 | 0.44 | (0.19–16) | 2 | (0.75–32) | 0.125 | (0.16–4) | 0.16 | (0.016–12) | CTX-M-9 ( |
| 234 (50,176,178) | 24,34,37 | UH2, UH3 | 3 | 0.5 | (0.38–1) | 2 | (0.75–12) | 0.25 | (0.064–0.5) | 0.38 | (0.064–0.5) | CTX-M-9 ( |
| ST110 | 28,29,30 | UH1, UH4, GH2 | 8 | 0.38 | (0.25–1) | 1.25 | (0.75–3) | 0.125 | (0.064–0.75) | 0.16 | (0.047–0.5) | OXA-48 ( |
| ST179 | ND,26,27 | UH3, GH2 | 4 | 0.5 | (0.5–0.75) | 1 | (0.75–4) | 0.094 | (0.064–0.38) | 0.094 | (0.064–0.75) | OXA-48 ( |
| ST100 | 6,7 | UH4 | 2 | 0.25 | (0.25–0.25) | 1.25 | (1–1.5) | 0.063 | (0.032–0.094) | 0.063 | (0.032–0.094) | – |
| ST175 | 16 | UH1, UH2 | 2 | 1.125 | (0.25–2) | 16.25 | (0.75–32) | 0.47 | (0.19–0.75) | 0.56 | (0.125–1) | SHV-12 ( |
| ST88,89, 102,173, 174,177, 180,181b | 1,4,9,11–13, 25,36 | UH1, UH4, UH5 | 10 | 0.25 | (0.13–1) | 0.88 | (0.75–32) | 0.1 | (0.047–0.75) | 0.079 | (0.064–2) | CTX-M-15 ( |
Susceptibility rates of E. cloacae isolates to various antimicrobials according to the ST type.
| No. of susceptible isolates (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial agent | ST74 | Other ST | |||
| (%) | (%) | ||||
| Ticarcillin + Clavulanic acid | 0 | (0.0) | 1 | (1.7) | NS |
| Piperacillin + Tazobactam | 2 | (12.5) | 6 | (10.2) | NS |
| Aztreonam | 0 | (0.0) | 3 | (5.1) | NS |
| Cefotaxime | 2 | (12.5) | 3 | (5.1) | NS |
| Ceftazidime | 2 | (12.5) | 2 | (3.4) | NS |
| Cefepime | 4 | (25.0) | 31 | (52.5) | 0.05 |
| Cefpirome | 3 | (18.8) | 14 | (23.7) | NS |
| Ertapenem | 0 | (0.0) | 0 | (0.0) | NS |
| Imipenem | 15 | (93.8) | 55 | (93.2) | NS |
| Meropenem | 16 | (100.0) | 57 | (96.6) | NS |
| Doripenem | 16 | (100.0) | 56 | (94.9) | NS |
| Tobramycin | 2 | (12.5) | 23 | (39.0) | 0.04 |
| Gentamicin | 3 | (18.8) | 26 | (44.1) | NS (0.06) |
| Amikacin | 14 | (87.5) | 58 | (98.3) | NS |
| Tetracycline | 10 | (62.5) | 29 | (50.0) | NS |
| Chloramphenicol | 3 | (18.8) | 31 | (53.4) | 0.05 |
| Nalidixic acid | 0 | (0.0) | 13 | (22.0) | NS |
| Ofloxacin | 1 | (6.3) | 13 | (22.0) | NS |
| Ciprofloxacin | 1 | (6.3) | 19 | (32.2) | 0.05 |
| Co-trimoxazole | 2 | (12.5) | 41 | (69.5) | <0.001 |
| Fosfomycin | 15 | (93.8) | 54 | (93.1) | NS |