Literature DB >> 26556444

Paradoxical low-flow aortic stenosis is defined by increased ventricular hydraulic load and reduced longitudinal strain.

Anthony A Holmes1, Cynthia C Taub, Mario J Garcia, Jian Shan, David P Slovut.   

Abstract

AIMS: Patients with paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis (PLF-AS) reportedly have higher left ventricular hydraulic load and more systolic strain dysfunction than patients with normal-flow aortic stenosis. This study investigates the relationship of systolic loading and strain to PLF-AS to further define its pathophysiology.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients (age 79 ± 12 years, 37% men) with an indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) of 0.6 cm/m or less and an ejection fraction of 50% or higher were divided into two groups based on indexed stroke volume (SVi): PLF-AS, SVi ≤ 35 ml/m, N = 46; normal-flow aortic stenosis, SVi > 35 ml/m, N = 74). Valvular and arterial load were assessed using multiple measurements, and strain was assessed using speckle-tracking echocardiography.
RESULTS: Patients with PLF-AS were found to have more valvular load (lower AVAi, P = 0.028; lower energy loss coefficient, P = 0.001), more arterial load [decreased arterial compliance and increased systemic vascular resistance (SVR), both P < 0.001] and more total hydraulic load [increased valvuloarterial impedance (Zva), P < 0.001]. Transvalvular gradients and arterial pressures were similar. Longitudinal strain was lower in PLF-AS (P < 0.001), but circumferential and rotation strains were similar. On adjusted regression, AVAi, SVR and longitudinal strain were associated with PLF-AS [odds ratio (OR) = 1.34, P = 0.043; OR = 1.31, P = 0.004; OR = 1.34, P = 0.011, respectively]. When SVR and AVAi were replaced with Zva, longitudinal strain and Zva (OR = 1.38, P = 0.015; OR = 1.33, P < 0.001 for both, respectively) were associated with PLF-AS.
CONCLUSION: Increased hydraulic load, from more severe valvular stenosis and increased vascular resistance, and longitudinal strain impairment are associated with PLF-AS and their interplay is likely fundamental to its pathophysiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26556444     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  2 in total

1.  Impaired Left Ventricular Circumferential Midwall Systolic Performance Appears Linked to Depressed Preload, but Not Intrinsic Contractile Dysfunction or Excessive Afterload, in Paradoxical Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Dorota Długosz; Andrzej Surdacki; Barbara Zawiślak; Stanisław Bartuś; Bernadeta Chyrchel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Hannah Z R McConkey; Michael Marber; Amedeo Chiribiri; Philippe Pibarot; Simon R Redwood; Bernard D Prendergast
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.