J Gromoll1, F Tüttelmann2,3, S Kliesch4. 1. Centrum für Reproduktionsmedizin und Andrologie, Abteilung Klinische Andrologie, WHO Kooperationszentrum, EAA Ausbildungszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude D11, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. 2. Institut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland. 3. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Andrologie, Dortmund, Deutschland. 4. Centrum für Reproduktionsmedizin und Andrologie, Abteilung Klinische Andrologie, WHO Kooperationszentrum, EAA Ausbildungszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude D11, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. kliesch@ukmuenster.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Germany there is an emerging trend for postponing parenthood due to non-medical, sociocultural reasons. This clearly impacts on the reproductive success due to an age-dependent decrease in fertility. Thus, strategies and techniques are currently discussed which could preserve the female fertility status, among which social freezing (cryopreservation of oocytes) for later fertilization is the most realistic one; however, while there is an intensive discussion on the procedure and timing of oocyte cryopreservation, virtually no attention has been paid to the male side and the aging effects on the male germ cells. AIM: To evaluate the risk paternal age poses for the integrity of germ cells. METHODS: For this review a literature search using PubMed, data from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany, the German in vitro fertilization (IVF) register as well as own data were used. RESULTS: Sperm cell integrity is clearly affected by age both at the genetic as well as at the epigenetic levels. The estimated mutation rate for spermatozoa doubles every 16.5 years. Monogenic and multifactorial diseases are strongly associated with paternal age. Men aged >40 years have an increased risk of passing age-related mutations to their children. CONCLUSIONS: Cryopreservation of spermatozoa is an option for men who postpone planning a family. Genetic counseling is recommended for couples undertaking social freezing and a male age of >40 years.
BACKGROUND: In Germany there is an emerging trend for postponing parenthood due to non-medical, sociocultural reasons. This clearly impacts on the reproductive success due to an age-dependent decrease in fertility. Thus, strategies and techniques are currently discussed which could preserve the female fertility status, among which social freezing (cryopreservation of oocytes) for later fertilization is the most realistic one; however, while there is an intensive discussion on the procedure and timing of oocyte cryopreservation, virtually no attention has been paid to the male side and the aging effects on the male germ cells. AIM: To evaluate the risk paternal age poses for the integrity of germ cells. METHODS: For this review a literature search using PubMed, data from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany, the German in vitro fertilization (IVF) register as well as own data were used. RESULTS: Sperm cell integrity is clearly affected by age both at the genetic as well as at the epigenetic levels. The estimated mutation rate for spermatozoa doubles every 16.5 years. Monogenic and multifactorial diseases are strongly associated with paternal age. Men aged >40 years have an increased risk of passing age-related mutations to their children. CONCLUSIONS: Cryopreservation of spermatozoa is an option for men who postpone planning a family. Genetic counseling is recommended for couples undertaking social freezing and a male age of >40 years.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aging process; Cryoconservation; Health status of progeny; Male germ cells; Mutations, sperm-specific
Authors: Leen Antonio; Frederick C W Wu; Terence W O'Neill; Stephen R Pye; Emma L Carter; Joseph D Finn; Martin K Rutter; Michaël R Laurent; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi; Thang S Han; Michael E J Lean; Brian G Keevil; Neil Pendleton; Giulia Rastrelli; Gianni Forti; Gyorgy Bartfai; Felipe F Casanueva; Krzysztof Kula; Margus Punab; Aleksander Giwercman; Frank Claessens; Brigitte Decallonne; Dirk Vanderschueren Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Rudolf P Talens; Kaare Christensen; Hein Putter; Gonneke Willemsen; Lene Christiansen; Dennis Kremer; H Eka D Suchiman; P Eline Slagboom; Dorret I Boomsma; Bastiaan T Heijmans Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 9.304
Authors: Augustine Kong; Michael L Frigge; Gisli Masson; Soren Besenbacher; Patrick Sulem; Gisli Magnusson; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Adalbjorg Jonasdottir; Wendy S W Wong; Gunnar Sigurdsson; G Bragi Walters; Stacy Steinberg; Hannes Helgason; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Agnar Helgason; Olafur Th Magnusson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nature Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 49.962