Literature DB >> 26556065

Phantom hand and wrist movements in upper limb amputees are slow but naturally controlled movements.

J B De Graaf1, N Jarrassé2, C Nicol3, A Touillet4, T Coyle3, L Maynard5, N Martinet4, J Paysant4.   

Abstract

After limb amputation, patients often wake up with a vivid perception of the presence of the missing limb, called "phantom limb". Phantom limbs have mostly been studied with respect to pain sensation. But patients can experience many other phantom sensations, including voluntary movements. The goal of the present study was to quantify phantom movement kinematics and relate these to intact limb kinematics and to the time elapsed since amputation. Six upper arm and two forearm amputees with various delays since amputation (6months to 32years) performed phantom finger, hand and wrist movements at self-chosen comfortable velocities. The kinematics of the phantom movements was indirectly obtained via the intact limb that synchronously mimicked the phantom limb movements, using a Cyberglove® for measuring finger movements and an inertial measurement unit for wrist movements. Results show that the execution of phantom movements is perceived as "natural" but effortful. The types of phantom movements that can be performed are variable between the patients but they could all perform thumb flexion/extension and global hand opening/closure. Finger extension movements appeared to be 24% faster than finger flexion movements. Neither the number of types of phantom movements that can be executed nor the kinematic characteristics were related to the elapsed time since amputation, highlighting the persistence of post-amputation neural adaptation. We hypothesize that the perceived slowness of phantom movements is related to altered proprioceptive feedback that cannot be recalibrated by lack of visual feedback during phantom movement execution.
Copyright © 2015 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amplitude; evolution over time; movement feedback; neuroplasticity; velocity; voluntary phantom movements

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26556065     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  4 in total

Review 1.  Origins of Phantom Limb Pain.

Authors:  Damien P Kuffler
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Induced sensorimotor brain plasticity controls pain in phantom limb patients.

Authors:  Takufumi Yanagisawa; Ryohei Fukuma; Ben Seymour; Koichi Hosomi; Haruhiko Kishima; Takeshi Shimizu; Hiroshi Yokoi; Masayuki Hirata; Toshiki Yoshimine; Yukiyasu Kamitani; Youichi Saitoh
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Characteristics of phantom upper limb mobility encourage phantom-mobility-based prosthesis control.

Authors:  Amélie Touillet; Laetitia Peultier-Celli; Caroline Nicol; Nathanaël Jarrassé; Isabelle Loiret; Noël Martinet; Jean Paysant; Jozina B De Graaf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  On the Visuomotor Behavior of Amputees and Able-Bodied People During Grasping.

Authors:  Valentina Gregori; Matteo Cognolato; Gianluca Saetta; Manfredo Atzori; Arjan Gijsberts
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.