Literature DB >> 26556061

Identifying perceived barriers to videoconferencing by rehabilitation medicine providers.

Roslyn Mozer1, Natalie K Bradford2, Liam J Caffery2, Anthony C Smith2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify barriers to the utilisation of videoconferencing within a multidisciplinary rehabilitation medicine healthcare team, as the first step towards creating a telerehabilitation service. A survey was developed on videoconference use and barriers to use, and distributed to healthcare providers including rehabilitation medicine societies and allied health societies through an anonymous link to SurveyMonkey(®). There were 254 respondents, practicing primarily in Australia (n = 245), in various healthcare roles. One-hundred and fifty-nine (66%) of respondents used videoconferencing regularly, primarily for their own education. Respondents not currently utilising videoconferencing (n = 82, 34%) ranked the reasons for this and provided free-text responses to explain why this modality was not being utilised in practice. Respondents were reluctant to use videoconferencing because of perceived increase in time needed for video consultations compared to face-to-face consultations, concerns with lack of privacy and confidentiality, and a lack of clinical practice guidelines for video consultation. We believe many barriers to videoconferencing by healthcare providers can be managed with appropriate education and targeted training. Future research studies, which focus on standards and clinical practice guidelines for videoconferencing by healthcare providers, may result in increased utilisation of this modality for healthcare delivery in rehabilitation medicine.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Keywords:  Rehabilitation Medicine; Teleconsulting; Telehealth; Telerehabilitation; Videoconferencing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26556061     DOI: 10.1177/1357633X15607136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  7 in total

1.  Telehealth Education: Impact on Provider Experience and Adoption.

Authors:  Kelli Garber; Tina Gustin
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 2.082

2.  Exploring the patient experience of telehealth hand therapy services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Melissa J Hirth; Jodie Hahn; Rebecca J Jamwal
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 1.908

3.  The opinions of radiographers, nuclear medicine technologists and radiation therapists regarding technology in health care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sil Aarts; Forra Cornelis; Yke Zevenboom; Patrick Brokken; Nicole van de Griend; Miriam Spoorenberg; Wendy Ten Bokum; Eveline Wouters
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2017-03

4.  Perspectives of Psychotherapists and Psychiatrists on Mental Health Care Integration Within Primary Care Via Video Consultations: Qualitative Preimplementation Study.

Authors:  Mariell Hoffmann; Michel Wensing; Frank Peters-Klimm; Joachim Szecsenyi; Mechthild Hartmann; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Markus W Haun
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Experiences and needs of people with haematological cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Nienke Zomerdijk; Michelle Jongenelis; Eva Yuen; Jane Turner; Kathryn Huntley; Andrew Smith; Megan McIntosh; Camille E Short
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.955

6.  Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Conceição Granja; Wouter Janssen; Monika Alise Johansen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Video Consultations Between Patients and Clinicians in Diabetes, Cancer, and Heart Failure Services: Linguistic Ethnographic Study of Video-Mediated Interaction.

Authors:  Sara E Shaw; Lucas Martinus Seuren; Joseph Wherton; Deborah Cameron; Christine A'Court; Shanti Vijayaraghavan; Joanne Morris; Satyajit Bhattacharya; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.