Nastaran Doroud1, Ellie Fossey2, Tracy Fortune1. 1. Department of Community and Clinical Allied Health, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia. 2. Living with Disability Research Centre, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Mental health recovery can be defined in variety of different ways. First person accounts of people experiencing mental health issues and qualitative studies of recovery suggest engaging in personally meaningful and socially valued occupations is important during the process of recovering. This scoping review sought to explore how occupational engagement and recovery are interrelated. METHODS: Using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework to guide the scoping review, searches of four electronic databases, manual citation tracking, and key authors' publications were conducted. Seventeen studies, published in the last 30 years, relevant to the topic were identified. Each was reviewed and data extracted to categorise the similarities and differences into themes. RESULTS: Most studies used qualitative, phenomenological and narrative research approaches. Findings across the studies indicate recovery is an ongoing occupational process that seems to involve experiences of gradual re-engagement, engaging within the stream of everyday occupational life, and full community participation. Engaging in meaningful and valued occupations appears to support recovering through fostering connectedness, hope, identity, meaning, and empowerment; establishing structured routines and assisting people in managing illness. CONCLUSION: This scoping review indicates occupational engagement is an important dimension of the recovery process: recovering is experienced through engaging in occupations, which, in turn, fosters personal recovery. Employment and volunteering have received most attention in studies of occupation and recovery. A broader view of the experiences and factors involved in the processes of 'occupational recovery' warrants further exploration to advance theory and inform recovery-oriented occupational therapy practice.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Mental health recovery can be defined in variety of different ways. First person accounts of people experiencing mental health issues and qualitative studies of recovery suggest engaging in personally meaningful and socially valued occupations is important during the process of recovering. This scoping review sought to explore how occupational engagement and recovery are interrelated. METHODS: Using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework to guide the scoping review, searches of four electronic databases, manual citation tracking, and key authors' publications were conducted. Seventeen studies, published in the last 30 years, relevant to the topic were identified. Each was reviewed and data extracted to categorise the similarities and differences into themes. RESULTS: Most studies used qualitative, phenomenological and narrative research approaches. Findings across the studies indicate recovery is an ongoing occupational process that seems to involve experiences of gradual re-engagement, engaging within the stream of everyday occupational life, and full community participation. Engaging in meaningful and valued occupations appears to support recovering through fostering connectedness, hope, identity, meaning, and empowerment; establishing structured routines and assisting people in managing illness. CONCLUSION: This scoping review indicates occupational engagement is an important dimension of the recovery process: recovering is experienced through engaging in occupations, which, in turn, fosters personal recovery. Employment and volunteering have received most attention in studies of occupation and recovery. A broader view of the experiences and factors involved in the processes of 'occupational recovery' warrants further exploration to advance theory and inform recovery-oriented occupational therapy practice.
Authors: Sebastian von Peter; Lena Göppert; Jenny Ziegenhagen; Timo Beeker; Rosa Glück; Birte Groth; Uwe Groß; Arne Reinholdt; Robin Boerma; Matthias Heißler; Juri Habicht; Julian Schwarz Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Jorge Pérez-Corrales; Domingo Palacios-Ceña; Marta Pérez-de-Heredia-Torres; Rosa Martínez-Piedrola; Carlos Sánchez-Camarero; Paula Parás-Bravo Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-03-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Alexandra Devine; Cathy Vaughan; Anne Kavanagh; Helen Dickinson; Sean Byars; Stefanie Dimov; Bill Gye; Lisa Brophy Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Pia Maria Ilvig; Michaela Kjær; Dorrie Jones; Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen; Lotte Nygaard Andersen Journal: Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Date: 2018-12