Literature DB >> 26555195

Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.

Nina Wardenga1, Cornelia Batsoulis1,2, Kirsten C Wagener3,4, Thomas Brand3,5, Thomas Lenarz3,1, Hannes Maier3,1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between hearing loss and speech reception threshold (SRT) in a fixed noise condition using the German Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA).
DESIGN: After training with two easily-audible lists of the OLSA, SRTs were determined monaurally with headphones at a fixed noise level of 65 dB SPL using a standard adaptive procedure, converging to 50% speech intelligibility. STUDY SAMPLE: Data was obtained from 315 ears of 177 subjects with hearing losses ranging from -5 to 90 dB HL pure-tone average (PTA, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 kHz).
RESULTS: Two domains were identified with a linear dependence of SRT on PTA. The SRT increased with a slope of 0.094 ± 0.006 dB SNR/dB HL (standard deviation (SD) of residuals = 1.17 dB) for PTAs < 47 dB HL and with a slope of 0.811 ± 0.049 dB SNR/dB HL (SD of residuals = 5.54 dB) for higher PTAs.
CONCLUSION: The OLSA can be applied to subjects with a wide range of hearing losses. With 65 dB SPL fixed noise presentation level the SRT is determined by listening in noise for PTAs < ∼47 dB HL, and above it is determined by listening in quiet.

Entities:  

Keywords:  German sentence test (OLSA) in noise; Speech reception threshold; discriminative power; matrix sentence test; medical audiology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26555195     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1079929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  7 in total

1.  Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.

Authors:  Hannes Maier; Uwe Baumann; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Dirk Beutner; Marco D Caversaccio; Thomas Keintzel; Martin Kompis; Thomas Lenarz; Astrid Magele; Torsten Mewes; Alexander Müller; Tobias Rader; Torsten Rahne; Sebastian P Schraven; Burkard Schwab; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Bernd Strauchmann; Ingo Todt; Thomas Wesarg; Barbara Wollenberg; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Hearing Aid Treatment for Patients with Mixed Hearing Loss. Part II: Speech Recognition in Comparison to Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation.

Authors:  Nina Wardenga; Ad F M Snik; Eugen Kludt; Bernd Waldmann; Thomas Lenarz; Hannes Maier
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Neural Activity During Audiovisual Speech Processing: Protocol For a Functional Neuroimaging Study.

Authors:  András Bálint; Wilhelm Wimmer; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weder
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-06-21

4.  The Hannover Coupler V2: Audiological outcomes of a round window coupler for the Vibrant Soundbridge.

Authors:  Nicole Knölke; Dawid Murawski; Nina Wardenga; Susan Busch; Hannes Maier; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-28

5.  [Speech audiometry in expert assessment of hearing impairment].

Authors:  C Batsoulis; A Lesinski-Schiedat
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Speech Audiometry at Home: Automated Listening Tests via Smart Speakers With Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Jasper Ooster; Melanie Krueger; Jörg-Hendrik Bach; Kirsten C Wagener; Birger Kollmeier; Bernd T Meyer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Individual Aided Speech-Recognition Performance and Predictions of Benefit for Listeners With Impaired Hearing Employing FADE.

Authors:  Marc R Schädler; David Hülsmeier; Anna Warzybok; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.