Literature DB >> 26555098

Timing of harvest of Phragmites australis (CAV.) Trin. ex Steudel affects subsequent canopy structure and nutritive value of roughage in subtropical highland.

Takashi S T Tanaka1, Chagan Irbis2, Hajime Kumagai3, Tatsuya Inamura3.   

Abstract

In recent decades, constructed wetlands dominated by common reeds [Phragmites australis (CAV.) Trin. ex Steudel] have been utilized for treating nitrogen-rich wastewaters. Although plant harvest is a vegetation management in constructed wetlands for the purpose of improving nutrient removal, harvested biomass has become a problem in many places. The reed has attracted increasing interest for its potential as high-quality roughage for ruminants. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the effect of reed harvest timing on subsequent regrowth, reconstruction of canopy structure, and nutritive value of regrown biomass for roughage when defining an appropriate vegetation management in constructed wetlands. The shoots of common reeds were harvested in January (winter), March (spring), and May (early summer) in a free-water surface constructed wetland in southwest China. Harvesting in winter enhanced the shoot regrowth and concentrations of total digestible nutrients (TDN), probably due to vigorous translocations of nonstructural carbohydrates from rhizomes. Harvesting in spring and early summer decreased aboveground biomass, nitrogen (N) standing stock, and concentrations of TDN. From fifty to 110 days after harvest, the TDN had sharply declined to values similar to non-harvested stands. Thus, to obtain high-quality roughage, it is recommended that regrown shoots be harvested again within a year in the early growing stage after the first harvest in winter.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canopy structure; Constructed wetland; Harvest; Phragmites australis; Stratified clipping method; Total digestible nutrients

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26555098     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  3 in total

Review 1.  Phytoremediation potential and control of Phragmites australis as a green phytomass: an overview.

Authors:  Shahabaldin Rezania; Junboum Park; Parveen Fatemeh Rupani; Negisa Darajeh; Xin Xu; Rahim Shahrokhishahraki
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Microbial removal and plant uptake of nitrogen in constructed wetlands: mesocosm tests on influencing factors.

Authors:  Wendong Tao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effects of Phragmites australis Shoot Remainder Silage on Growth Performance, Blood Biochemical Parameters, and Rumen Microbiota of Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Qiye Wang; Xianglin Zeng; Yutong Zeng; Xiaoruowei Liu; Yancan Wang; Xin Wang; Jianzhong Li; Yiqiang Wang; Zhi Feng; Pengfei Huang; Jia Yin; Jing Huang; Mingzhi Zhu; Huansheng Yang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.