Literature DB >> 2655501

Intrathecal methadone and morphine for postoperative analgesia: a comparison of the efficacy, duration, and side effects.

L Jacobson1, C Chabal, M C Brody, R J Ward, R C Ireton.   

Abstract

A double-blind study of patients selected at random compared the analgesic and adverse effects of intrathecal methadone (1 mg) with those of intrathecal morphine (0.5 and 1 mg). The study was conducted on 30 patients who underwent major orthopedic or urologic surgery. The intrathecal opioid was administered at the end of surgery, and assessments began 1 h thereafter and continued for 20 h. Pain measurements, supplementary analgesia requirements, and adverse effects were recorded. Intrathecal morphine (0.5 and 1 mg) provided effective and prolonged analgesia. Methadone, however, was unable to ensure the same degree of analgesia; consequently, the median pain scores were consistently higher following methadone than morphine (0.5 and 1 mg) (P less than 0.05). The time to the onset of discomfort severe enough to require supplemental morphine was longer after intrathecal morphine than that following methadone (24 and 29 h with morphine 0.5 and 1 mg; 6.5 h with methadone; P less than 0.05). Respiratory depression (increases PaCO2) was not associated with methadone and morphine 0.5 mg but was common following morphine 1 mg (P less than 0.05). Facial pruritus was unique to intrathecal morphine. Urinary retention requiring bladder catheterization was more frequent following morphine than methadone, although this was not statistically significant. Nausea and vomiting were common to all groups. Intrathecal morphine (0.5 and 1 mg) provides superior postoperative analgesia to 1 mg methadone. Various explanations for the observed differences between the drugs are discussed, including the possibility that the dose of methadone used in the subarachnoid space was inadequate and that a larger dose might have produced an effect equal to that of morphine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2655501     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198905000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

Review 1.  Patient-controlled spinal opiate analgesia in terminal cancer. Has its time really arrived?

Authors:  J Chrubasik; S Chrubasik; E Martin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Antinociceptive synergistic interaction between morphine and n omega-nitro 1-arginine methyl ester on thermal nociceptive tests in the rats.

Authors:  H Yamaguchi; H Naito
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the effectiveness and safety of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats.

Authors:  Ashraf Yassen; Erik Olofsen; Jingmin Kan; Albert Dahan; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Update on postoperative pain management.

Authors:  A N Sandier
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Methadone in the intrathecal treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain resistant to other neuroaxial agents: the first experience.

Authors:  Y Eugene Mironer; C David Tollison
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2001-01

7.  InTrathecal mORphine, traNsversus Abdominis Plane Block, and tramaDOl Infusion for Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (TORNADO): A Pilot Prospective Controlled Study.

Authors:  Andrea Russo; Bruno Romanò; Domenico Papanice; Andrea Cataldo; Carlo Gandi; Luigi Vaccarella; Angelo Totaro; Emilio Sacco; Pierfrancesco Bassi; Paola Aceto; Liliana Sollazzi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.