Literature DB >> 26554751

Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.

Tae-Wook Kong1,2, Suk-Joon Chang1,2, Xianling Piao3, Jiheum Paek1,2, Yonghee Lee1,4, Eun Ju Lee1,5, Mison Chun1,6, Hee-Sug Ryu1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: This study investigates the pattern of disease recurrence and identifies the clinicopathologic prognostic factors for patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma treated with laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy (LRH/RRH).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 128 patients with FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer. Preoperative examination did not uncover definitive evidence of parametrial invasion or lymph node metastasis in any of the patients; therefore, all patients underwent LRH/RRH with retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy between April 2006 and December 2013. Sites of disease recurrence and all possible clinicopathologic factors related to the risk of disease recurrence were determined.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis demonstrated that laparoscopic intracorporeal colpotomy (P < 0.041, odds ratio 7.038, 95% confidence interval 1.059-15.183) represented a strong prognostic factor related to disease recurrence. We categorized the minimally invasive surgery group into LRH through vaginal colpotomy (LRH-VC; 79 patients) and LRH/RRH through intracorporeal colpotomy (LRH/RRH-IC; 49 patients) according to the colpotomic approaches. Disease recurrence was higher in the LRH/RRH-IC group than in the LRH-VC group (16.3% vs 5.1%, P = 0.057), with five patients in the LRH/RRH-IC group experiencing intraperitoneal spreads.
CONCLUSIONS: Total laparoscopic/robotic intracorporeal colpotomy under CO2 pneumoperitoneum may carry a risk of positive vaginal cuff margin, as well as intraperitoneal tumor spreads in patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated with LRH/RRH.
© 2015 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracorporeal colpotomy; intraperitoneal spread; laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy; vaginal colpotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26554751     DOI: 10.1111/jog.12840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  34 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer: When Is Laparoscopic Appropriate?

Authors:  Stefano Greggi; Gennaro Casella; Felice Scala; Francesca Falcone; Serena Visconti; Cono Scaffa
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Undifferentiated Carcinoma After Laparoscopic Surgery for a Cystic Ovarian Tumour: A Case Study.

Authors:  Kosuke Shigematsu; Koki Samejima; Keisuke Sawada; Takahiro Uotani; Taichi Akahori; Shigetaka Matsunaga; Tomonori Nagai; Jun-Ichi Tamaru; Yasushi Takai
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2021-11-03

3.  Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Li; Chunlin Chen; Ping Liu; Anwei Lu; Hongwei Zhao; Xuemei Zhan; Hui Duan; Pengfei Li; Weidong Zhao; Jilong Yao; Donglin Li; Haixia Jiang; Mubiao Liu; Xiaonong Bin; Jinghe Lang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node mapping during laparoscopic surgery with vaginal cuff closure but no uterine manipulator for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yoichi Aoki; Hiroyuki Kanao; Atsushi Fusegi; Makiko Omi; Sanshirou Okamoto; Terumi Tanigawa; Hidetaka Nomura; Kohei Omatsu; Akiko Tonooka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer?

Authors:  Louise Benoit; Meriem Koual; Huyen-Thu Nguyen-Xuan; Vincent Balaya; Claude Nos; Rosa Montero-Macías; Anne-Sophie Bats
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Effect of modified no-touch laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on outcomes of early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fangjie He; Songhua Yuan; Xia Chen; Siyou Zhang; Yubin Han; Tiecheng Lin; Bingnan Xu; Shimin Huang; Zhiyin Pan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 4.711

7.  Retrospective Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in a Single Tertiary Care Institution from Lithuania between 2009 and 2019.

Authors:  Danuta Vasilevska; Dominika Vasilevska; Andrzej Semczuk; Vilius Rudaitis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  How should gynecologic oncologists react to the unexpected results of LACC trial?

Authors:  Jeong Yeol Park; Joo Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 9.  Unexpected result of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanao; Yoichi Aoki; Nobuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Survival Outcomes in Patients With 2018 FIGO Stage IA2-IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy: A Propensity Score-Weighting Analysis.

Authors:  Wancheng Zhao; Yunyun Xiao; Wei Zhao; Qing Yang; Fangfang Bi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.