Literature DB >> 2655451

Evaluation of the clinical performance of three triphasic oral contraceptives: a multicenter, randomized comparative trial.

L H Schilling1, O T Bolding, C B Chenault, A P Chong, F Fleury, K Forrest, H I Glick, H M Hasson, C G Heil, R S London.   

Abstract

Three hundred thirteen women participated in an open, multicenter comparison of the incidence of intermenstrual bleeding (breakthrough bleeding and or spotting) associated with the use of three triphasic oral contraceptives. Triphasil (n = 107), containing levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol, and Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 (n = 97) and Tri-Norinyl (n = 109), both of which contain norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol, were administered over four cycles for a total of 1141 cycles. The total incidence of intermenstrual bleeding was significantly lower with Triphasil (17.2%) than with Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 (39.5%) or Tri-Norinyl (49.0%). The pattern remained the same when findings were analyzed cycle by cycle and for breakthrough bleeding and spotting separately. The incidence of other side effects was comparable for all regimens. Results of this study demonstrate superior cycle control with Triphasil compared with Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 and Tri-Norinyl during the first four cycles of use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Bleeding; Clinical Research; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents, Estrogen--side effects; Contraceptive Agents, Female--side effects; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin--side effects; Contraceptive Agents--side effects; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Developed Countries; Diseases; Ethinyl Estradiol--side effects; Family Planning; Levonorgestrel--side effects; Menstruation Disorders; Metrorrhagia; Norethindrone--side effects; North America; Northern America; Oral Contraceptives, Combined--side effects; Oral Contraceptives, Phasic--side effects; Oral Contraceptives--side effects; Research Methodology; Research Report; Signs And Symptoms; Studies; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2655451     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(89)80011-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  1 in total

Review 1.  Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  H A A M Van Vliet; D A Grimes; F M Helmerhorst; K F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.